Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cautious?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
    So.....a mutilator who is so out of control that he cant resist killing and mutilating a prostitute in the street... then again 10 days later in a dawn lit backyard, suddenly, and just for 1 hour, gains control over his actions?

    Better premises make better discussions Pierre. But I suppose there is as much evidence of your suggestion as there is some interruption halted the process.

    Heres a thought...Liz Stride was killed because her killer wanted her dead. Not in pieces.
    Hi Michael

    Thanks for your contribution.

    What theory are you referring to when you postulate that the killer was "out of control"?

    Do you mean that he was "disorganized"?

    Research has shown that the dichotomy of an organized / disorganized serial killer has low validity if you want to use this as a classification.

    See for instance Hunting Serial Predators. A Multivariate Classification Approach to Profiling Violent Behavior by Grover Maurice Godwin (CRC Press 1999).

    Another question.

    You write: "Heres a thought...Liz Stride was killed because her killer wanted her dead. Not in pieces."

    But could you not just as well hypothesize that the killer was in control, since he abstained from mutilating the first victim, knowing that he was going to look for another one to perform mutilations on her instead?

    I am really interested to hear what you think about these two questions.

    Kind regards, Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    David is such a jokester, isnīt he?

    And the more everybody are doing their best to behave like this

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIIk4f9MLEk

    the more they think they can make others think that Pierres theory is bogus!

    Regards Pierre
    No...because it is bogus.

    Regards Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by The Good Michael View Post
    Except it was David's suggestion of cachous for cochon and it was a joke. A good one, but it was taken like bait.

    Mike
    David is such a jokester, isnīt he?

    And the more everybody are doing their best to behave like this

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIIk4f9MLEk

    the more they think they can make others think that Pierres theory is bogus!

    Regards Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    Originally posted by JadenCollins View Post
    It was meant for Pierre anyways.

    Since he's interpreting every single word differently, there should be a new dictionary out there, the Pierre's bizarre view of words.
    Except it was David's suggestion of cachous for cochon and it was a joke. A good one, but it was taken like bait.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by DJA View Post
    105 years later, the cruise only cost ten pounds.
    Now about $10K depending on line and cabin category.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mayerling
    replied
    Funny thing is that I always thought "cachous" sounded like the noise one makes as one sneezes ("Ah CHOOO"!!).

    If we are going to make wild guesses as to the murder victims of the Double Event, has anyone ever thought seriously of the Stride - Swedish connection? Maybe Jack was injured by a prostitute in Stockholm, or while visiting Upsala? Maybe Jack liked the misogynist plays of the contemporary Swedish genius August Strindberg? Perhaps "cachous" has a homophonic sounding word in "Swedish" that means something our killer was hinting at in his metaphysical/metaphorical language of confusion to everyone else.

    Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    105 years later, the cruise only cost ten pounds.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by DJA View Post
    Ned's father was sent here for stealing pigs from a guy named Cooney.
    Yep, lucky bugger, free cruise to Aus.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Well if we believe Joes story was true, Ned and Mary were both descended from a John Kelly.
    Ned's father was sent here for stealing pigs from a guy named Cooney.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by DJA View Post
    Ah Fook.

    Ned's first "customer".
    Well if we believe Joes story was true, Ned and Mary were both descended from a John Kelly.

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Ah Fook.

    Ned's first "customer".

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by DJA View Post
    Ned's first siblings were Mary Jane and Annie.
    I raised that in another thread.

    Along with the idea that Dan hanged instead of Ned (an idea I suspect you know is far from original and gets support from some serious historians).

    Leave a comment:


  • DJA
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    My turn to try a Pierre.

    My data sources point towards Kelly, being metaphorically the solution of the scientific dilemma that dances us.

    I have unsourced data that points to each victim having been metaphorically known as Kelly, eg one document uses the word "nod" similar in Cinstruction to "Ned", a rather well known Kelly in some parts. Just one example I can't reveal the others for fear they will vanish, the answer being so outstanding in nature.
    Ned's first siblings were Mary Jane and Annie.

    Leave a comment:


  • el_pombo
    replied
    I'm pretty sure my great grandfather was JTR! I mean... he lived on the planet earth which links him to the murder sites, further, I know for a fact that he didn't like prostitutes and I have a letter posted by someone in the same city where he lived that contains several words with the letters J, T and R! What more do you need?

    I was giving Pierre the benefit of doubt, but at this point I'm starting to give up!

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    My turn to try a Pierre.

    My data sources point towards Kelly, being metaphorically the solution of the scientific dilemma that dances us.

    I have unsourced data that points to each victim having been metaphorically known as Kelly, eg one document uses the word "nod" similar in Cinstruction to "Ned", a rather well known Kelly in some parts. Just one example I can't reveal the others for fear they will vanish, the answer being so outstanding in nature.

    Now from there we know "Kelly" rhymes with "Belly".

    A study if the English language, with which I am not overly familiar, shows belly to be synonym for Guts. And most police are proud of their courage which sounds a bit like breath mints.

    Therein lies the penultimate clue.

    Now just one more piece of data and I can unmak the rotter. But the burden weights heavy in my narrow shoulders.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X