Originally posted by Tom_Wescott
View Post
In your post above you said, "Flash forward years later when Bulling goes nuts on alcohol and (allegedly) starts telling reporters on Fleet Street that HE was responsible for the Ripper letters."
This seems to be the man described in the Thurston Hopkins book that you thought previously, according to your article, could not be positively identified as Bulling but now you seem to be saying it was Bulling. Aren't you contradicting yourself there, Tom? That was the point of my post. I don't have any new information on the matter one way or the other.
All the best
Chris
Comment