First of all i need to note how the "dear boss" letter was the first communique using the nick name 'Jack the ripper'. i belive there are many points showing its eligability to being the killer
as said:"[I]that joke about the leather apron gave me real fits"[I]
makes me belive that one view could be that the killer wanted reconisation and didnt want his work to be confused with that of the 'leather apron' or john pizer. another point to be reconized:
"The next job I do I shall clip the ladys ears off and send to the police officers just for jolly wouldnt you.
which comes in with how the proximity of the date the letter was written to the date of the 'double event' is too much to be a coincidence to me.
the date turned it to the CNA:september 27th 1888
the date of the 'double event':september 30th 1888
and that how the writer mentions that I shall clip the ladys ears off
is errily reminesent to how the ripper cliped Eddowes ear off
yours truly
as said:"[I]that joke about the leather apron gave me real fits"[I]
makes me belive that one view could be that the killer wanted reconisation and didnt want his work to be confused with that of the 'leather apron' or john pizer. another point to be reconized:
"The next job I do I shall clip the ladys ears off and send to the police officers just for jolly wouldnt you.
which comes in with how the proximity of the date the letter was written to the date of the 'double event' is too much to be a coincidence to me.
the date turned it to the CNA:september 27th 1888
the date of the 'double event':september 30th 1888
and that how the writer mentions that I shall clip the ladys ears off
is errily reminesent to how the ripper cliped Eddowes ear off
yours truly
Comment