Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An experiment

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
    Dear Pierre,

    without knowing the word you cannot say that, given David has said it was from a letter to the Home secretary, without knowing the content of that you are guessing and of course it could be a letter about your suspect.

    However it will have as much connection to the case as the word "Judges".

    steve
    Hi Steve,

    So now starts the defence of David again. I thought you were able to think by yourself. Why do you not let David do the talking for the material instead.

    Of course it has no connection to the case. It is just that David became so illuminated when he saw a word nobody had thought of before.

    But there may be more such words. And they have nothing to do with the case. They are just words.

    Regards, Pierre

    Comment


    • Well there are no winners.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
        However it will have as much connection to the case as the word "Judges".
        This is entirely accurate.

        Comment


        • Here it is

          So to reveal the word....

          I'm posting the actual image of the word as it appears in the November 1888 letter but I thought I would make it easier for you to decipher, sorry I mean more difficult, by adding some photoshopped effects to replicate that "chalk on wall" feel, with some added blurring to keep Pierre happy.

          I want to stress that I don't say that it looks exactly like 'Juwes' only that it potentially could have done.

          Can anyone actually work out from this what it is?

          Clue: the first two letters are "Ju" and the last two are indeed "es" as Pierre wanted.
          Attached Files

          Comment


          • Well, at first glance I thought it said 'jackass'.

            Comment


            • Judases?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
                Judases?
                Yours is more probable than mine.

                Comment


                • None of the above.

                  Come on chaps, you can do it.

                  Comment


                  • Boy you will kick yourselves.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
                      None of the above.

                      Come on chaps, you can do it.
                      Obviously, reading blurred handwriting is not easier now than it was then.

                      Regards, Pierre

                      Comment


                      • Justices?

                        Edit: cannot believe I just had to edit the spelling on that. Please help me. :P
                        Last edited by MsWeatherwax; 06-04-2016, 11:01 AM.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by MsWeatherwax View Post
                          Justises?
                          We have a winner!!!

                          Well done Ms Weatherwax.

                          Actual spelling being "Justices".

                          Or, in other words, magistrates.

                          Comment


                          • Here is the actual image without effects.
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                            • And the full page for context. You will see that the word "Justices" actually appears four times.
                              Attached Files

                              Comment


                              • So annoyed you got to before I noticed the spelling. 😂

                                However, it looks more like 'justices' in your edited version than the original. I'd never havegot it from that.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X