Tweet
[QUOTE=GUT;418496]
That is a very interesting answer, GUT.
Why did they get the same wrong?
Not only both got it wrong, but the same wrong.
Why did they get the same wrong?
-
-
[QUOTE=Pierre;418587]Why don't you STATE SOMETHING rather than continually asking questions of others?Originally posted by GUT View Post
Oh of course: it's because every time you state something it is immediately and irrefutably shown to be hilariously erroneous.
My apologies. I forgot how badly things have gone for you here.Comment
-
The fact is they didn't.Originally posted by Pierre View Post
I love that a so called academic historian is willing to ignore the only sources we have, that all say Juwes, and instead insert a word of his own choosing. Real academic integrity there. Even the great scientist or sociologist or whatever else you pretend to be wouldn't do that.G U T
There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Comment
-
<< That would also explain the superlative use of "the men" in the phrase "the jews are the men than will not be blamed for nothing". If the phrase actually referred to the jews, it would say "The jews will not be blamed for nothing". >>
This was a time when women weren't always referenced as part of a culture...for instance, Englishmen could be used in place of The English. So the fact that the statement mentions men specifically doesn't mean it isn't discussing a mixed group of genders.Comment
-
Originally posted by DJA View Post
Juwes is not an Afrikaans word.
The Afrikaans word meaning Jews is Jode.Comment
-
Yep.Originally posted by PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1 View Post
That was a mistake I made in 2016.My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
Comment