He gave the police his name

[GUT]

... This is a very silly thread!"

Like most of the threads started by Pierre.

[Wickerman]

I'm good at guessing!
Metaphorical? No problem!
Challenge accepted!

Found him, he goes by the name of:

sir purrnest meowington snugglebottom

I mean, come on! Look at the hideous mustache, he looks suspicious!


Enjoy!

Suspiciously like Prater's cat, Diddles, 'cept Diddles was black so,
.....oh, silly me, of course...Diddles in disguise, with stripes on!
(Sounds almost like a Beatles song)

[Pcdunn]

"I wish to complain...

This is hilarious. I feel like I'm trapped in a Monty Python sketch. 😂

... This is a very silly thread!"

[MsWeatherwax]

This is hilarious. I feel like I'm trapped in a Monty Python sketch. 😂

[GUT]

I have come to a conclusion regarding the use of metaphysics and or metaphorical language by the suspect Pierre has chosen. Scotland Yard made a serious error in this case - they should not have used Frederick Abberline.

Instead they should have used Henry Sidgewick or gone to Germany and asked the assistance of Friedrich Nietzche to review the evidence and all those marvelous letters to better come to some grasp of the complexities of the case.

Jeff

My votes for Nietzche.

Or what about Joan (Joan was quizzical studied metaphysical science....)

As much sense as some else makes anyway (won't use his name or he might appear).

[JadenCollins]

Unknown right?

I'm good at guessing!
Metaphorical? No problem!
Challenge accepted!

Found him, he goes by the name of:

sir purrnest meowington snugglebottom

I mean, come on! Look at the hideous mustache, he looks suspicious!


Enjoy!

[Mayerling]

I have come to a conclusion regarding the use of metaphysics and or metaphorical language by the suspect Pierre has chosen. Scotland Yard made a serious error in this case - they should not have used Frederick Abberline.

Instead they should have used Henry Sidgewick or gone to Germany and asked the assistance of Friedrich Nietzche to review the evidence and all those marvelous letters to better come to some grasp of the complexities of the case.

Jeff

[GUT]

[QUOTE=Elamarna;366599]

[B]Hi,

" and it contains the full name of the person I think was the killer."

Pierre,

is this name written in normal English, or it it metaphorical?

[QUOTE=Pierre;366608]

It is metaphorical. If he had written in normal English they would have caught him immediately on this occasion.

Regards, Pierre

Darn quote function.

Try again.

So it's worthless then, because it relies on your brilliance like the mile and MJKs room???

[nicole]

Hi all,

Here I some data....Pierre, in just 4 months, you have started 33 separate threads. I'm phoning The Guinness Book of Records!! That's not a compliment btw.....

That's about 8 a month, or 2 a week. Yes, I did the math. But remarkably, you have presented NOTHING. Zilch!! This gives everyone else an idea where your proposed theory lies....IN THE CLOUDS!

How can anyone take you seriously?

Respectfully

Nicole

[GUT]

So it's worthless then.

[GUT]

Hello Pierre,

I don't know if you've noticed but some of your posts have started to take on a Hitchcockian quality!

Started??.??

[Elamarna]

so we have another new thread saying exactly what every other thread says

"i can't tell you yet"

for a moment i almost believed you had concrete evidence, but no nothing so clear, shame because i want to someone to find it.

why start another thread Pierre, surly you could have said this on any of your other threads?

Steve

[GUT]

Hi,

I hardly dare to write this down.

Today I have been examining a data source from 1888. I have been looking at this very briefly before and I thought there was nothing specific about this source. But I made an analysis of it today - and it contains the full name of the person I think was the killer.

There is now hardly any doubt. I must have found him.

But I will not give his name before I have seen the last bit of data. I want to give you conclusive evidence.

Kind regards, Pierre

Dear dear Pierre.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP

[GUT]

Pierre,

Were you not looking for your last bit of data 3 sets of new data ago?

I thought it was 5.

But I still say horse twaddle.

[Elamarna]

[QUOTE=Pierre;366608]

It is metaphorical. If he had written in normal English they would have caught him immediately on this occasion.

Regards, Pierre

so its down to your interpretation yet again, why am I not surprised