New piece of evidence found

[Shaggyrand]

Manage your flow bro... you are engaging in theater and you know it, so do it well. The third act has to be as good as the first and as of now you have written yourself into a colossal letdown. No one forgives a flop. Stop orchestrating one.

Act 1- A mild mannered and well meaning SCIENTIST moves to a new town full of mean and bitter people all devoted to a single topic of study. The natives do not take kindly to his mannerisms. He pushes on because despite his reservations he knows his is right.
Act 2- The SCIENTIST teases out his theory and tries to befriend the nasty towns folk who tire of his games. Just before the intermission he emerges triumphant as all bask in the glory of his revelations. This act is very long and needs a good edit.
Act 3- The nasty townsfolk poke holes in his theory wide enough to drive a military convey through and burn the rest of it to the ground. The SCIENTIST is undeterred and there is something about truth and people not willing to face it blah blah blah.

The third act is going to be everyone's favorite. The inevitable sequel, hopefully a musical, will be unbearable though.

[Errata]

To my friends on here - Walk away & return at a time when this nonsense is over, you are too smart to be taken in by this provocative tease.

Never mind that officially no information, no data, no conclusion could possibly be worth this kind of buildup. Even bulletproof evidence revealing the real killer is going to seem like a disappointment after all this.

Manage your flow bro... you are engaging in theater and you know it, so do it well. The third act has to be as good as the first and as of now you have written yourself into a colossal letdown. No one forgives a flop. Stop orchestrating one.

[Stephen Thomas]

Why are people bothering with this Pierre geezer?

He's obviously a total tosser.

[barnflatwyngarde]

Can administration please put a stop this nonsense. How much bandwidth has to be wasted? Enough is enough.

I wholeheartedly concur!

To quote from "Blazing Saddles" this is "Genuine frontier gibberish"!

[Monty]

I shall be monitoring this Pierre,

I hope you have understood what you interpreted.

Monty

[JadenCollins]

Stop playing games with us, Pierre. You found "the one"? Great! Take a piece of paper or use Word, write it down, type it, save it/file it and be done with it. If you don't open up about your so called data, then there's no need to make threads about it, it has no use for us.

[Abby Normal]

Hi,

it is a known data source which has been wrongly interpreted by ripperologists and where the police in 1888 has stated the right content of the source.

Regards Pierre

Hi Pierre
Interesting. is it a letter or writing purportedly by the killer?
Is it the Goulston street graffiti? Or have you already stated you think the GSG was from the killer?

[Jon Guy]

I already know that the jury is here, the hangman is waiting and the gallow is put in its place.

You`ve got a very strong case for pleading insanity, so Broadmoor for you, not Newgate.

[Pierre]

Amanda, I love you!

Pierre, If you truely have found some new evidence then that is amazing for all of us. Well done. But, if you are not willing to share it just yet then please keep things like this to yourself. All that is going to happen is more people like me becoming annoyed with you. I have read with great interest some of these posts and kept quiet for now but please just stop. You seem to just be poo-pooing other peoles ideas and research with vagueness and saying things along the lines of, 'your theory as to this wrong, but I won't tell you why'. What's the point of that? All that does is create anger. If you have a theory (which you believe you have) then post it and let others ask questions. People with vast knowledge of this subject will either help you to confirm your theory, or they will tell you that they disagree and more importnantly WHY.

Hi,

I already know that the jury is here, the hangman is waiting and the gallow is put in its place.

But they seem to forget what job they should do and who the real criminal is.

Regards Pierre

[Chris2307uk]

Dear Casebook Friends,

I have immensely enjoyed my past months here on the Forum, exchanging ideas, investigating theories and having heated debates.
You are all intelligent, approachable individuals & I have learned much.

However, when Pierre started to post his vague tidbits (for that is the only way to describe them) I decided to back away, to stop reading the posts & lost contact with many posters whom I had previously enjoyed conversing with.

Today I returned, to have a little peak at what is occurring. Pierre is still here, tying the posts in knots, sliding in just enough hints to keep members interested but never actually giving a single thing away. I despair.

To my friends on here - Walk away & return at a time when this nonsense is over, you are too smart to be taken in by this provocative tease.

To Pierre - Publish your findings, if you indeed have anything to publish and stop undermining the real investigative authors, intellectuals and researchers.

My apologies to anyone who does not appreciate this post - rant over.
Amanda

Amanda, I love you!

Pierre, If you truely have found some new evidence then that is amazing for all of us. Well done. But, if you are not willing to share it just yet then please keep things like this to yourself. All that is going to happen is more people like me becoming annoyed with you. I have read with great interest some of these posts and kept quiet for now but please just stop. You seem to just be poo-pooing other peoles ideas and research with vagueness and saying things along the lines of, 'your theory as to this wrong, but I won't tell you why'. What's the point of that? All that does is create anger. If you have a theory (which you believe you have) then post it and let others ask questions. People with vast knowledge of this subject will either help you to confirm your theory, or they will tell you that they disagree and more importnantly WHY.

[Amanda]

Nonsense

Dear Casebook Friends,

I have immensely enjoyed my past months here on the Forum, exchanging ideas, investigating theories and having heated debates.
You are all intelligent, approachable individuals & I have learned much.

However, when Pierre started to post his vague tidbits (for that is the only way to describe them) I decided to back away, to stop reading the posts & lost contact with many posters whom I had previously enjoyed conversing with.

Today I returned, to have a little peak at what is occurring. Pierre is still here, tying the posts in knots, sliding in just enough hints to keep members interested but never actually giving a single thing away. I despair.

To my friends on here - Walk away & return at a time when this nonsense is over, you are too smart to be taken in by this provocative tease.

To Pierre - Publish your findings, if you indeed have anything to publish and stop undermining the real investigative authors, intellectuals and researchers.

My apologies to anyone who does not appreciate this post - rant over.
Amanda

[Pierre]

Hi,
If I had hair, I would be pulling it out..
Pierre do you not realise,, that this way of correspondence, is extremely annoying to the majority of us ..talking in riddles.?
Nobody expects you to disclose a theory that you have an intention of publishing, if this is your adjective,best of luck to you, but please refrain from the term ''data'', and ''I have discovered'', if you cannot discuss its relevance.
Regards Richard.

Hi Richard,

Well, I understand it is annoying but I do not mean to talk in riddles. I mean what I say.

This source has been wrongly interpreted but in 1888 the police did state the right content of it.

So what can we learn from this?

We could for instance learn that we have to go back and check our interpretations of the sources.

And we could also learn that we should be open to different interpretations.

We could also learn that going back to the sources could in some cases be more important than reading books with other peoples interpretations.

Richard - if you were the Whitechapel killer and you wanted to give the police some clue about yourself as the killer, what sort of clue would you like to give them? (One can think of many).

Regards Pierre

[richardnunweek]

Hi,
If I had hair, I would be pulling it out..
Pierre do you not realise,, that this way of correspondence, is extremely annoying to the majority of us ..talking in riddles.?
Nobody expects you to disclose a theory that you have an intention of publishing, if this is your adjective,best of luck to you, but please refrain from the term ''data'', and ''I have discovered'', if you cannot discuss its relevance.
Regards Richard.

[Pierre]

congrats! Pierre

what is it?

Hi,

it is a known data source which has been wrongly interpreted by ripperologists and where the police in 1888 has stated the right content of the source.

Regards Pierre

[GUT]

Can administration please put a stop this nonsense. How much bandwidth has to be wasted? Enough is enough.

Yep.