Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Historical Xmas present

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Henry Flower
    replied
    Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
    While ever we put fuel on the fire it will continue to burn.
    I think you're being way too rational and too idealistic, Bridewell. We are humans, and this is the internet. There is a certain grim pleasure to be had from seeing what arrant nonsense the charlatan has posted now. There is also a sliver of satisfaction in seeing an arrogant buffoon put firmly in his place. There will never come a day when Pierre's posts are wholly ignored and he goes away.

    I admire the indefatigable way his nemesis David counters and demolishes Pierre's every attempt to manure the boards with his shoddy evidence and analysis. Thanks to David and others there is little chance that a newcomer might be taken-in by the joker and his games.

    Pierre is never going to be ignored and go away. He is going to waste time and energy with his infantile games until he is prevented from doing so. In my opinion he really should long ago have been prevented from doing so.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Hate to revive a Pierre thread, but as predicted six months after Christmas, still no sign of his promised present.

    Isn't it time to say enough.

    Nothing constructive ever gets discussed here anymore, just this foolishness of I know something you don't nah nah, nah nah, nah.
    While ever we put fuel on the fire it will continue to burn.

    Leave a comment:


  • Henry Flower
    replied
    I meant 'principal' rather than 'principle' - apologies, and I can't imagine how I could've allowed the word 'principle' to creep into a post addressed to Pierre, who famously has none.

    Leave a comment:


  • Henry Flower
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Hate to revive a Pierre thread, but as predicted six months after Christmas, still no sign of his promised present.

    Isn't it time to say enough.

    Nothing constructive ever gets discussed here anymore, just this foolishness of I know something you don't nah nah, nah nah, nah.
    Surely you get it by now: it's Pierre - so the present isn't the principle purpose of the post, it's the promise. Forgive my inadvertent alliteration.

    Pierre is a charlatan and a fraud who loves attention. He always rants against David, but in fact without David demolishing him at every turn I think he would shrivel and wither away for lack of attention.

    David is actually Pierre's psychological life-support.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Hate to revive a Pierre thread, but as predicted six months after Christmas, still no sign of his promised present.

    Isn't it time to say enough.

    Nothing constructive ever gets discussed here anymore, just this foolishness of I know something you don't nah nah, nah nah, nah.

    Leave a comment:


  • John G
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    I make a mean Pud, think P-error might do something else with his.
    I've got a feeling you may be right there, GUT!

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by John G View Post
    Yes, that's all very well, but what I'm really interested in is: how proficient are you at making Christmas puddings?
    I make a mean Pud, think P-error might do something else with his.

    Leave a comment:


  • John G
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    No, GUT: that is your own mistake. I am an historian and a sociologist. You have constantly had problems with understanding this.

    Pierre
    Yes, that's all very well, but what I'm really interested in is: how proficient are you at making Christmas puddings?

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    No, GUT: that is your own mistake. I am an historian and a sociologist. You have constantly had problems with understanding this.

    Pierre
    Without a tiny bit of proof you are either in fact, based on your posts Historian can be almost totally ruled out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    As is everything he posts.

    Remember he took months to even decide what field his qualification is in.

    He just likes playing silly little games.
    No, GUT: that is your own mistake. I am an historian and a sociologist. You have constantly had problems with understanding this.

    Pierre

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by John G View Post
    "It is a tale, told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." (William Shakespeare, Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 5).
    As is everything he posts.

    Remember he took months to even decide what field his qualification is in.

    He just likes playing silly little games.

    Leave a comment:


  • John G
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    David can not help himself wondering what I think. He does it all the time. He has nothing better to do than to follow me here and read everything I write.
    "Twinkle, twinkle little bat! How I wonder what you're at! Up above the world you fly, Like a tea-tray in the sky." (Lewis Carroll)

    Leave a comment:


  • David Orsam
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    David can not help himself wondering what I think. He does it all the time. He has nothing better to do than to follow me here and read everything I write.
    I suppose I should be grateful that Pierre has at least understood me (on his second attempt) even if he hasn't quite grasped the fundamental point that it's impossible for anyone here to sensibly discuss with him his non-existent "xmas present".
    Last edited by David Orsam; 12-25-2016, 11:12 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pierre
    replied
    Originally posted by David Orsam View Post
    Here's what I said:

    I do wonder what Pierre thinks anyone can possibly discuss about a document they've never seen which supposedly contains at least one false statement (or lie) which no-one has any idea about.
    David can not help himself wondering what I think. He does it all the time. He has nothing better to do than to follow me here and read everything I write.

    Leave a comment:


  • John G
    replied
    Originally posted by Pierre View Post
    I can discuss whatever I want, David. I can speculate about sources if I want to. What I do in a forum is not relevant. What is relevant is my research.
    Pierre,

    I'm afraid you are turning out to be the most recalcitrant of pupils. If you continue to misbehave I shall require you, as a penance, to translate Euclid's Elements, a geometrical treatise comprosing 13 volumes, into Latin.
    Last edited by John G; 12-25-2016, 11:11 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X