I am sure that many members will be as sorry as I was to read of the death of Philip Sugden (Obituary Daily Telegraph, 17th May). To my mind his book, The Complete History of Jack the Ripper, is the best one yet written. His meticulous researching of the source material and his balanced analyses of the possible suspects is a model for other Ripperologists. His final conclusion was that "... in all honesty I cannot find a convincing case against any of them. And there is every possibility that the man the Victorians called 'the master murderer of the age' was in reality a complete nobody whose name never found it into the police file ... some sad social cripple who lived out his days in obscurity, his true identity now known only to the dead."
I totally agree with his verdict except that I believe that his name will emerge from obscurity with the help of modern tools such as computerised searches and the increasing availability in the public domain of records of all sorts. No-one who lived in Victorian Britain did not leave an imprint of some sort.
Prosector
I totally agree with his verdict except that I believe that his name will emerge from obscurity with the help of modern tools such as computerised searches and the increasing availability in the public domain of records of all sorts. No-one who lived in Victorian Britain did not leave an imprint of some sort.
Prosector
Comment