1. Essential question that picques the logical mind; thus, the debate! I learned that there is no outright answer seamlessly linking 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 to 5 other than strangulation and throat-slash. Instead, i remember learning to 'group and link'. The problem forgoing the debate is what metrics to use. Ex: grouping Chapman and Eddowes by evisceration; grouping Stride and Chapman by neckerchief; linking Stride to Eddowes by Chapman.
2. He or they was/were performing an extracurricular ritual activity on prostitutes of the lowest class in a third world environment. Strength and precision were evident in the murders as were suggestions of cannibalism and compulsion. The motivation could have simply been monomania with speculations on its magnitude. In other words, did mania serve the man?
Alt. answer: why did spanko spank young maids?
3. I have my doubts since Masons, like Police, is a broad term. Its often forgotten that these are departmental organizations with tendencies to factionalize intrrnally. Implicating the Masons would be conspiratorial. However i am open to the discussion that Jack the Ripper may have had a stupid knowledge of the Masonics by 1888 standards of Freemasonry in and around London.
4. Better question is : why did the sensational murders stop? If he killed again, it was never with the same purpose or identity. Why?
5. No. It's a secret.
2. He or they was/were performing an extracurricular ritual activity on prostitutes of the lowest class in a third world environment. Strength and precision were evident in the murders as were suggestions of cannibalism and compulsion. The motivation could have simply been monomania with speculations on its magnitude. In other words, did mania serve the man?
Alt. answer: why did spanko spank young maids?
3. I have my doubts since Masons, like Police, is a broad term. Its often forgotten that these are departmental organizations with tendencies to factionalize intrrnally. Implicating the Masons would be conspiratorial. However i am open to the discussion that Jack the Ripper may have had a stupid knowledge of the Masonics by 1888 standards of Freemasonry in and around London.
4. Better question is : why did the sensational murders stop? If he killed again, it was never with the same purpose or identity. Why?
5. No. It's a secret.
Comment