While in question, are newspaper sources reliable and credible in the information they provide? For it seems that they too are unaffected in their unwavering ability to romanticize and give false information on the crimes in order to sell.
It has been suggested by other Ripperologists that while the crimes were being perpetrated, the victims were generally drawn in rather sexually 'enlightening' ways - better clothing, hour-glass figures, small feet and hands, and rather 'submissive' poses - one could say that this has lead to the romanticism of Mary Kelly, generally viewed to be the last of the 'canonical' Ripper's victims.
What seems so ironic to me is while the crimes are lust-murders, the view taken up and exploited to the public seemed to have capitalized on sex: it sells.
Anyways, I ran across this little snippet on a former site.
Could anyone possibly explain its source and if any of the information portrayed in it is reliable? If so, perhaps there are more photos of the victims out there somewhere.
For those who do not want to strain their eyes by trying to read the newspaper, it states: "The portraits of the fallen women to which he had singled out to wreak his morbid passion accompanying this stride are, in every instance, authentic. They have been collected from one source and another. Some of them are cheap tin-types owned by friends of the murdered women.
The picture of Mary Jeannette Kelly, who was otherwise known as 'Fair Emma,' was pictured from her parents in Limerick. Of the several victims of Jack the Ripper she is most interesting. The woman was comely even to the day she was slaughtered, although at that time she fallen into the depths of degradation.
She was a child of striking beauty, and when only sixteen she was wedded to a miner in Cardiff. He was killed in an explosion, and the captain of a trading steamer, who was quite wealthy, took a fancy to her. He hired masters for her and she acquired quite a smattering of education. . ."
Now, is this just all fabricated and made up to sell? Where did the author get this information? Also, if one is to believe, apparently Mary Kelly's family had been found, or at least a photograph of her existed at one point. Also, who is this captain? Mary Kelly was said to have had a relationship with a captain before, I believe - is there any information on this?
Interesting food for thought.
It has been suggested by other Ripperologists that while the crimes were being perpetrated, the victims were generally drawn in rather sexually 'enlightening' ways - better clothing, hour-glass figures, small feet and hands, and rather 'submissive' poses - one could say that this has lead to the romanticism of Mary Kelly, generally viewed to be the last of the 'canonical' Ripper's victims.
What seems so ironic to me is while the crimes are lust-murders, the view taken up and exploited to the public seemed to have capitalized on sex: it sells.
Anyways, I ran across this little snippet on a former site.
Could anyone possibly explain its source and if any of the information portrayed in it is reliable? If so, perhaps there are more photos of the victims out there somewhere.
For those who do not want to strain their eyes by trying to read the newspaper, it states: "The portraits of the fallen women to which he had singled out to wreak his morbid passion accompanying this stride are, in every instance, authentic. They have been collected from one source and another. Some of them are cheap tin-types owned by friends of the murdered women.
The picture of Mary Jeannette Kelly, who was otherwise known as 'Fair Emma,' was pictured from her parents in Limerick. Of the several victims of Jack the Ripper she is most interesting. The woman was comely even to the day she was slaughtered, although at that time she fallen into the depths of degradation.
She was a child of striking beauty, and when only sixteen she was wedded to a miner in Cardiff. He was killed in an explosion, and the captain of a trading steamer, who was quite wealthy, took a fancy to her. He hired masters for her and she acquired quite a smattering of education. . ."
Now, is this just all fabricated and made up to sell? Where did the author get this information? Also, if one is to believe, apparently Mary Kelly's family had been found, or at least a photograph of her existed at one point. Also, who is this captain? Mary Kelly was said to have had a relationship with a captain before, I believe - is there any information on this?
Interesting food for thought.
Comment