JTR Museum

[Observer]

I would advise both of you gentlemen to take a breather.

In for a penny in for a pound Robert.

Better to be hanged for a sheep than a lamb.

I suspect El White Woman frequents other Forums, where the dialogue which has just transpired is the norm. He really believes he can use such language and escape a ban in here. I for one apologies, to all the posters who have the misfortune to view the exchanges between myself and that idiot. I should have shown more restraint, but hey, what the hell.

[GUT]

So to reiterate.

Edwards opens a shop and museum.

Releases a book full of so much wrong information that makes your head swim.

Now he announces a museum.

I wonder how bad his next will be.

I wonder if the table cloth will be in his magical museum.

[Observer]

Hey hold on. You put that museum down before you knew Mr Edwards had anything to do with it

[GUT]

Hey hold on. You put that museum down before you knew Mr Edwards had anything to do with it

Yep because of what he had done.

Now please tell us what he actually got right in his book.

Kate's DNA? Nope

Koz's DNA? Not looking good for your hero.

Michaelmas being observed by a Jew in '88 ? Not real likely.

That they are Daisies on his rag? Nope

That an honest copper committed at least 2 crimes to keep it? Sure that makes sense doesn't it.

[Observer]

Yep because of what he had done.

Now please tell us what he actually got right in his book.

Kate's DNA? Nope

Koz's DNA? Not looking good for your hero.

Michaelmas being observed by a Jew in '88 ? Not real likely.

That they are Daisies on his rag? Nope

That an honest copper committed at least 2 crimes to keep it? Sure that makes sense doesn't it.

You don't get it do you? Or choose not to see it more like. You had no idea who had opened that museum, and yet in here, in a very well viewed public forum discussing all things Jack The Ripper, you chipped in that it had been opened by

"Some other crackpot with a pet theory to peddle"

You had no idea at that point who had opened the museum.

Mr Edwards book was very misleading in many aspects yes, as I said though my criticism of you has nothing to do with that.

[GUT]

You don't get it do you? Or choose not to see it more like. You had no idea who had opened that museum, and yet in here, in a very well viewed public forum discussing all things Jack The Ripper, you chipped in that it had been opened by

"Some other crackpot with a pet theory to peddle"

You had no idea at that point who had opened the museum.

Mr Edwards book was very misleading in many aspects yes, as I said though my criticism of you has nothing to do with that.

But I was dead right was I not.

It is being opened by a Person with a crackpot theory, Edwards.

Just not another crackpot theory the same one.

[GUT]

Don't get you started on the Michelmas daisies. Believe me, it doesn't need you much to "get started", where Mr Edwards is concerned. Edwards produced a book, not dissimilar in inaccuracies to many Ripper authors, it's the genre. Get over it. He produced a book made some money. I'll tell you what, I'll start a thread discussing Stephen Knights book, and you can pull that to bits as well.

Still waiting on your Stephen Knight thread.

[GUT]

And can you show me one post where I "Put the knife into" Edwards, let alone where took every opportunity to do so.

If he chooses to publish a book using wrong information and claim "Case Solved" he must expect to get flack.

But I am sure he is a big boy and can stick up for himself, and doesn't need you to fight his battles.

Still waiting on all these examples.

[Admin]

We apologize for the disruption to this thread. We have probably missed some posts that needed to be purged but have cleaned a bit of the mess away. Please continue with the discussion of the museum or the cockney or trashing various books and theories. All acceptable topics.

[GUT]

We apologize for the disruption to this thread. We have probably missed some posts that needed to be purged but have cleaned a bit of the mess away. Please continue with the discussion of the museum or the cockney or trashing various books and theories. All acceptable topics.

Thank you.

Can we limit it to Cockney or even Aus v Us v English, English?

[MrBarnett]

I think you'll like these, GUT (and others).

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=w6rsPPqSAuk

[GUT]

Thanks for getting the thread back on track Mr B.

[GUT]

Missed one

China = China Plate = Mate

[GUT]

I just realised that what MrBarnett posted above looks to be on a tea towel, has it been DNA tested? It may belong in the museum.

[MrBarnett]

Hi GUT,

What's a tea towel? ;-)

I hadn't heard cobblers 'stalls' before , surely it should be 'awls'.

Did you catch the youtube clips?

Chas and Dave at their ' Best'.

Gary