Originally posted by lynn cates
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
One JtR and only 1
Collapse
X
-
Last edited by Batman; 03-01-2015, 07:24 AM.Bona fide canonical and then some.
-
Five for me and the killer snuffed it soon after the Kelly murder or was locked up and he most certainly didn't take a shawl to any of the murder scenesThree things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
-
And so two biologists walked into the bar and . . .
Hello Batman. Thanks.
And I suggest you read ALL the journal articles from the 1960's where your point was trashed.
In fact, that phenomenon is what led to the extravagant view of "Eliminative Materialism" being concocted by Paul and Patti Churchland and Willard Quine towards the end of that period.
(Should have know you were in biology--your grammar and spelling are a dead give away.)
Permit me to leave you with this closing thought:
314.1 C. (heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh-heh)
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
prime example
Hello Scott. Engineer?
A mathematician, statistician and engineer were asked to give proofs by enumeration that all odds greater that 1 were prime.
(Mathematician): "Let's see. 1 is undefined, 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 is prime. Oops! 9 is NOT prime. Contradiction. No theorem."
(Statistician): "Let's see. 1 is undefined, 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 is prime. Oops! 9 is NOT prime. But 11 is, and so's 13! Ah! Statistical aberration. The theorem holds."
(Engineer): "Let's see. 1 is undefined, 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 is prime, 11 is prime, 13 is prime, 15 is prime . . ."
What did you expect? He's an engineer. (heh-heh)
(Don't hit me!)
Cheers.
LC
Comment
-
I don't believe in magic. Which is essentially the claim of the philosophy that deny physicalism and deny explanations from science for things like logic and mind. As far as I am concerned I believe in material mechanisms like the brain which evolved language to describe nature.
Anyway the point is this. You can't answer the questions in the original post about examples of your multi killer hypothesis nor why there is a correlation between degree of mutilation and environmental factors.Bona fide canonical and then some.
Comment
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Batman. Thanks.
What correlation? Another of your imaginary ones?
Cheers.
LC
The multiple killer hypothesis is the randomized third chart. There is no correlations at all.Bona fide canonical and then some.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Batman View PostI don't believe in magic. Which is essentially the claim of the philosophy that deny physicalism and deny explanations from science for things like logic and mind. As far as I am concerned I believe in material mechanisms like the brain which evolved language to describe nature.
Anyway the point is this. You can't answer the questions in the original post about examples of your multi killer hypothesis nor why there is a correlation between degree of mutilation and environmental factors.
Really anyone with any kind of chronic disease believes in magic. We have to. There's really only so much time you can spend trying to figure out why you, why like this, what went wrong, etc. before it makes you suicidal. I'm bipolar, and in order to get better I had to decide that it didn't matter. But I couldn't until I gave up trying to understand what happened. I have no idea what happened. Nor does anyone else. It happened. Magic. Can't fix magic, time to learn how to deal with the medical equivalent of an evil witch's curse.
Believe in magic. Just a little. It's kind of a happy thing.The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
Comment
Comment