Hello Lynn,
I suppose the ultimate answer is quite one nobody likes about this blasted apron piece, timing, double event etc...
There at least 7...yup SEVEN official versions of the Goulston Street Graffiti.. all from witnessing policemen. Different spellings, different wordings etc.
And it was recorded thus by these fair minded men only.
Now... exactly how many policemen does it take to get one tiny bit of writing observed correctly? I mean, you would have thought that they would have at least had a pow-wow and reached some sort of same conclusion?... But no...oh no... and then along comes big chief Warren and it gets rubbed off... and here's the punchline...
Exactly HOW, pray tell me, IF the Goulston Street Graffiti was written by the killer, (as was supposed by the police at the time), can anyone from this intrepid bunch identify said graffiti and compare it, by REMEMBERING it please note.... with the Dear Boss and Saucy Jack handwriting.. that was posted all over the place in large posters promoting said killer's handwriting... and say it was by the same hand?....without a photograph? and without a solid memory (which by the above 7 variations shows was non-existant anyway)???... and what type of hand was the description of the GSG???? It certainly wasn't the same type of hand that wrote Dear Boss and Saucy Jack!!
You see... it is impossible to have one load of policemen saying that the killer was the writer of the Goulston St graffiti and another lot saying that the writer of Dear Boss and Saucy Jack was the killer. So all had to say that all three bits of scribble were from the same hand... but it isn't brain surgery....
...it is seriously impossible to say that!!..... given there was no definitive record of the GSG!.... and the types of writing, by description.... don't match at all!
Phil
I suppose the ultimate answer is quite one nobody likes about this blasted apron piece, timing, double event etc...
There at least 7...yup SEVEN official versions of the Goulston Street Graffiti.. all from witnessing policemen. Different spellings, different wordings etc.
And it was recorded thus by these fair minded men only.
Now... exactly how many policemen does it take to get one tiny bit of writing observed correctly? I mean, you would have thought that they would have at least had a pow-wow and reached some sort of same conclusion?... But no...oh no... and then along comes big chief Warren and it gets rubbed off... and here's the punchline...
Exactly HOW, pray tell me, IF the Goulston Street Graffiti was written by the killer, (as was supposed by the police at the time), can anyone from this intrepid bunch identify said graffiti and compare it, by REMEMBERING it please note.... with the Dear Boss and Saucy Jack handwriting.. that was posted all over the place in large posters promoting said killer's handwriting... and say it was by the same hand?....without a photograph? and without a solid memory (which by the above 7 variations shows was non-existant anyway)???... and what type of hand was the description of the GSG???? It certainly wasn't the same type of hand that wrote Dear Boss and Saucy Jack!!
You see... it is impossible to have one load of policemen saying that the killer was the writer of the Goulston St graffiti and another lot saying that the writer of Dear Boss and Saucy Jack was the killer. So all had to say that all three bits of scribble were from the same hand... but it isn't brain surgery....
...it is seriously impossible to say that!!..... given there was no definitive record of the GSG!.... and the types of writing, by description.... don't match at all!
Phil
Comment