Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Photos of the players

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Photos of the players

    Hi, let me set up my reasons for posting before my question: I am not trying (as in the second link) to say who was involved in the killings, nor am I personally vouching for the photos I ask about. I have seen these pictures of Eddowes and Stride on the Net, as if these are really they. On Netley, my reason for bringing him in is not as a suspect so much, but as someone who was brought up forty years ago (rightly or wrongly), yet no one knew he existed. We find out he did exist and now have a photo. Also, on the Net (sorry no link at this point) are his descendants verifying that there was indeed a coachman named Netley, who was born to a bus driver or something. I have no way of knowing whether any of this is real or not. I've been fooled so many darned times that I doubt I'll state foot size with any certainty, anymore.
    I have looked at many of the threads here, but searching is very long and tedious with thousands of posts, and since most of these pictures seem to have surfaced in recent years, I thought I would simply ask.
    Again, those who are not "in to" the Royal Conspiracy, I join you. But, as people post pictures of surrounding neighborhoods and people, I do feel that in the case of the Netley picture, it does add to the history and color.
    As to Elizabeth and Catherine, again: Where do these come from? Are they real? Did I miss the obvious? Are these referred to anywhere of trust?
    Thank you.
    Kathy Rose


    Eddowes and Stride

    Netley

  • #2
    trust

    Hello Kathy. Welcome to the boards.

    Well, personally, I do not trust them.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm in a non-trust sort of mood on these, myself. A photo of a painting of the infamous Madame LaLaurie (Slave torturer in old New Orleans) shows up in a book as being her. The picture is all over the Net on LaLaurie-ite sites, but any quick research shows where the artist painted the pictures according to his imagination in 2006. Now, it's almost fact. I am intrigued by the Netley family thing, but I lost my marker on that. A little more research, I guess.
      Thanks for responding, LC.
      Kathy Rose

      Comment


      • #4
        progression

        Hello Kathy. Thanks.

        "quick research shows where the artist painted the pictures according to his imagination in 2006. Now, it's almost fact."

        And with this, you have identified the great peril of ripper studies--today's hypothesis is tomorrow's theory and the next day's "definitely ascertained fact."

        And all without additional evidence.

        Cheers.
        LC

        Comment

        Working...
        X