-
It was Bury whodunnit. The black eyed scoundrel.
The yam yams are the men, who won't be blamed for nothing.. -
profiling a ripperologist
Hello Ashkenaz. Thanks for posting this. Time for a profile.
In that he thinks "Jack" left handed shows he is working with quite obsolete data.
In that he needs a "pre-wounding" (1882) shows he has read the FBI report and is a fan of CSI.
In that he identifies exactly 5 women and adverts to probability theory indicates . . . well, fill in the blank.
Cheers.
LC -
Ah, Lynn ... but the man´s got a full two (2) years of investigations behind him. Surely he will be knowledgeable enough ...?
The best,
FishermanComment
-
"He died childless at 88 in 1940. Prof Cuitino said: “He probably killed himself.”
He just couldn't live with the guilt a moment longer.
Comment
-
52 years ain´t that bad an effort, Debra - let´s not take anything away from him!
Besides, Cuitino is the probability expert here. He´s probably right.
The best,
FishermanComment
-
observation
Hello Debs. Astute observation. (I'm still giggling.)
I wonder if any of these blokes ever visit the boards or read Rip or NIR?
Cheers.
LCComment
-
warning: graphic
Hello Christer. Indeed.
I'd love to see his bar graphs for the various suspects. (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LCComment
-
-
finder's fee
Hello Chris. Thanks for that.
If he makes any money on a book, doesn't he owe Chris Scott a fee? (heh-heh)
Cheers.
LCComment
-
More undermining reports: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...=feeds-newsxml
Better than the usual suspects, at least he's neither a famous artist nor writer.Comment
-
"Appleford was from the Essex town of Coggeshall, where Cuitiño said residents were famed as being 'stupid', which may have turned him into a social outcast."
Now, that´s a strong pointer to guilt if ever I saw one!
FishermanComment
-
Appleford is the Brother of Emily Appleford, wife of Dr Frederick Gordon Brown.
Not only was Appleford Browns Brother in law, he was also his partner.
Monty
Monty
https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif
Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622Comment
-
The fact that the other "major suspects" named in the Daily Mail's article are PAV, Robert Mann and HH Holmes tells a lot... not only about Cuitinho and his left-handed Saucy Jacky
Quote: Appleford died on August 31, the same date as the first crime, in 1940 when he was 88-years-old the year corresponding to 1888 - the year of the murders.
Yeah, whatever. I wonder if there's also an anagram somewhere.
Quote: Cuitiño has admitted there may be a degree of speculation as to his claims.
Nooooooo!!! Really???
Best regards,
WWhoooops... I did it again.Comment
-
Appleford Testified in 1882 Wounding Case
From The Old Bailey Online:
JOHN BISHOP, Breaking Peace > wounding, 11th September 1882.
Reference Number: t18820911-873
Offence: Breaking Peace > wounding
Verdict: Not Guilty > unknown
873. JOHN BISHOP (45) , Feloniously wounding Ann Bishop, with intent to do her grievous bodily harm.
MR. ROUMIEU Prosecuted.
STEWART ANDREWS (Policeman K 283). About 12.30 on the morning of the 25th July I was called by a boy to go to 38, Macklin Street—I saw the prisoner standing outside his house—I took him inside with me, and found this knife among some old boots lying in the window; there was blood on it—I asked him how it came on it; he said "That is the knife that did it, but she did it herself"—I found the wife had been taken to the London Hospital, and I took the prisoner to the station and charged him.
Cross-examined by the Prisoner. You did not give me the knife—I found it myself.
STEPHEN HERBERT APPLEFORD . I am house surgeon at the London Hospital; Ann Bishop was brought there on the morning of July 25th, suffering from a clean cut incised wound on the left side of the neck, at the lower part, about two inches in length; it was superficial in most of its extent, but went to a depth of half an inch in its deepest part; she left the hospital on 1st August; it is nothing serious, and she is not being attended to now—this knife (produced) might have caused the wound; it might have been self-inflicted—I cannot say it is more likely to have been inflicted by anybody else than by herself; it is just possible, but hardly probable, that the wound was self-inflicted; it is so low down.
Cross-examined. She was only six days in the hospital—I can't say if she is right or left handed.
By the COURT. The wound was in a dangerous neighbourhood, but no important structures were divided; the deepest part of the wound was in the middle, but the muscle is more prominent there, which would account for it—I cannot say absolutely whether the woman was under the influence of drink—I think not.
ANN BISHOP . I am the prisoner's wife, and live at 38, Macklin Street Mile End—on the evening of 24th July I came home about 12.30; my husband was standing against the window; he had been violently drinking in the week, and does not know what he is doing when he gets a drop of drink, because he is a madman—I did not see him do anything, but when I turned round I felt something stick in my neck—I laid my baby down and went over the road, and a young lady led me to the doctor at the comer of the Burdett Road; that is my knife.
Cross-examined by the Prisoner. We had no high words—I had been having a little drop of ale with my lodger.
STEWART ANDREWS (Recalled). The prisoner might have had a little drink, but he knew what he was about—I did not see the woman.
Prisoner's Statement before the Magistrate. I took the knife away from her; she had it up to her own throat—I said to her "You are drunk;" she said "Am I?" and seized the knife; I seized it from her; she then no out.
The prisoner in his defence said that he accused her of being drunk; she snatched up the knife which was before her to throw at him, when he caught her elbow to prevent her, and the knife cut her neck.
NOT GUILTY .Comment
-
Left handed? I thought the throat slashings were from left to right indicating a right handed killer
JordanComment
Tweet
Comment