Originally posted by Jason
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
D'Onston for dummies
Collapse
X
-
But are they "has beens" like a humber of Casebook posters. In which event they can add up to anything you want. or more likely, can't add up at all.
Isn't 39 always the answer in Ripperology though?
Phil H
Comment
-
Well, seeing this column is entitled "D'Onston for dummies" I'll bite:
Does anybody on here consider D'Onston a serious contender for Jack the Ripper?
Was D'Onston a Theosophist? (I ask because in Bell Book and Candle Elsa Lanchester tells Jimmy Stuart the man who lived in his apartment before him was very nice and HE was a theosophist. First I ever heard of it. Lets face it Blavatsky is interesting herself)
Why was D'Onston considered by the police, at all, as a suspect? So far, in reading Jack the Ripper and Black Magic, by Spiro Dimolianis all I can see is he was interested in the case and anybody interested I guess immediately became a suspect?
Other than that, they thought he might've slipped out at night from the asylum and then returned after his wicked wicked ways.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beowulf View PostWell, seeing this column is entitled "D'Onston for dummies" I'll bite:
Does anybody on here consider D'Onston a serious contender for Jack the Ripper?
Was D'Onston a Theosophist? (I ask because in Bell Book and Candle Elsa Lanchester tells Jimmy Stuart the man who lived in his apartment before him was very nice and HE was a theosophist. First I ever heard of it. Lets face it Blavatsky is interesting herself)
Why was D'Onston considered by the police, at all, as a suspect? So far, in reading Jack the Ripper and Black Magic, by Spiro Dimolianis all I can see is he was interested in the case and anybody interested I guess immediately became a suspect?
Other than that, they thought he might've slipped out at night from the asylum and then returned after his wicked wicked ways.
It might appear to me that it was more that D'Onston might have considered himself suspect, or at least seems to have given people the idea that he could have been the Ripper, if the story of the bloody ties is to be believed. But if I am right, then he was more like writer George Sims and Sims' seemingly his light-hearted line that he (Sims) matched the description of a Ripper suspect. At the very least, D'Onston was a busybody who interfered in various ways with the case and who "thought he knew" more than he probably did.
All the best
ChrisChristopher T. George
Organizer, RipperCon #JacktheRipper-#True Crime Conference
just held in Baltimore, April 7-8, 2018.
For information about RipperCon, go to http://rippercon.com/
RipperCon 2018 talks can now be heard at http://www.casebook.org/podcast/
Comment
-
While you are on Chris...Is there any evidence of patients suffering from Neurasthenia..(which seems to me the Victorian version of Yuppie flue) getting day release or weekend leave during their "rest cures"...or would they have to sign in and out at a porters lodge or some such office
Regards
Andy
Comment
-
October 3, 1888 -- Grand and Batchelor take Matthew Packer to view the body of Catharine Eddowes, implying that it is Elizabeth Stride in order to evaluate his testimony. Packer passes the test, saying he does not recognize the body.
Have just come across this on the timeline, don't really understand it, which is why I'm posting on the "dummies" thread.
I presume Grand and Batchelor are private detectives, seems they have an inordinate amount of sway....were they hired by the police...?...or if youve trawled over it before ad nauseum could someone simply point me in the right direction?
Comment
-
-
-
-
Hullo Andy1867.
Dissertations, dissertations, dissertations. If you have yet to do so. When I first started visiting this wonderous cite, I barely glanced at the boards. After a long minute I started reading the boards, and after another long minute I was allowed the oppotunity to post by our gracious hosts. Dissertations. Many blessings.Valour pleases Crom.
Comment
Comment