If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yes, it is curious. It seems like such an important point to just be glossed over.
Exactly. But doesn't it appear to you that much about Millers Court was kept "secret" by the authorities -- on purpose. Very quick inquest so the facts are not made public.
Gosh, Redbundy -did you really need to tell us that about your brother ? It put me off my lunch.
Yes your right I didnt need to put that in there, there is something disturbing about a high school kid on one of those sites looking for much, much older women. He does have some issues... Sorry to anyone else who got offended by that
Unless some other report turns up, I think our conclusion has to be that the heart was taken away. Odd though that this was not unequivocally stated.
The fact the doctors (Macdonald, Phillips) searched the ashes in the fire grate suggests something only they could recognise, like body tissue, was indeed missing.
Unless some other report turns up, I think our conclusion has to be that the heart was taken away. Odd though that this was not unequivocally stated.
I knew the heart was missing, and that I believe Abberline considered it may have been burnt in the fire and a search of the ashes was made, and I would think if one burned a heart, no matter how hot the fire was, it would leave some sort of residue, and I think they did not find such.
But I was surprised to read, and I would love to hear of any feedback on this one, in The Man who Hunted Jack the Ripper, by Nicholas Connell and Stewart P Evans the following in chapter 10 titled 13 Miller's Court:
"Kelly's body had been opened and the contents strewn around the bed, her left hand had been thrust into the thoracic cavity."...
I've never read that anywhere else. The paragraph goes on to say the police were summoned by McCarthy, who on arrival at Commercial St Police Station 'inquired at first for Inspector Reid.' and the notation (1).
The back of the book lists the chapters and the sources and the source for (1) is Weekly Dispatch, 18 November 1888. But I do not know if that source is for the entire paragraph and especially for the gruesome detail regarding 'the left hand thrust in the thoracic cavity'...does anyone else know if this is mistaken information on Reids part? Or the writers of this book?
I knew the heart was missing, and that I believe Abberline considered it may have been burnt in the fire and a search of the ashes was made, and I would think if one burned a heart, no matter how hot the fire was, it would leave some sort of residue, and I think they did not find such.
Yes, I've burned some chicken hearts by accident before while trying to cook them and they don't burn up. They just shrivel up and turn black.
This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.
Comment