Appropos of nothing in particular, I was thinking today of the relative cost of accomodation in 1888.
Polly Nicholls was paying 4d a day, or 2/4 a week, for a four bed dormitory in a lodging house, whereas Mary Kelly was paying 4/10 a week (29/ behind in her rent, 6 weeks behind, 29/ divided by 6 turns out to be 4/10) for a (sparsely) furnished room of her own.
Kelly was paying more than double Nichols rate, do others suppose it was really worth it for her to do so? I can see that at least Kelly had a guarenteed bed at the end of the day, but apart from that, she seems to me to have been paying a lot more money for not a lot more in the way of accomodation!
pax
Polly Nicholls was paying 4d a day, or 2/4 a week, for a four bed dormitory in a lodging house, whereas Mary Kelly was paying 4/10 a week (29/ behind in her rent, 6 weeks behind, 29/ divided by 6 turns out to be 4/10) for a (sparsely) furnished room of her own.
Kelly was paying more than double Nichols rate, do others suppose it was really worth it for her to do so? I can see that at least Kelly had a guarenteed bed at the end of the day, but apart from that, she seems to me to have been paying a lot more money for not a lot more in the way of accomodation!
pax
Comment