Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Special Branch Register and Ledger-decison Notice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pcdunn
    replied
    Originally posted by The Grave Maurice View Post
    Lord Randolph Churchill was Sir Winston's dad, Maria. He has been suggested as a suspect, but not really very seriously. You can read about him here:
    http://www.casebook.org/ripper_media...morley/36.html
    Thank you for the link, perhaps it will answer some of my own questions about him...

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    You don't need to be Rob Clack to figure out R Churchill Maria.

    Monty

    I was intrigued by this, having recently watched a TV documentary on Jenny Jerome Churchill, which mentioned some details about her husband, including his personality and mental state.
    I had said, half-jokingly, "there's a Jack the Ripper type!" My companion said that a fiction book she was reading on the Whitechapel murders did mention that Randolph Churchill was a suspect.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris
    replied
    Originally posted by Chris View Post
    That decision acknowledges a blunder in the interpretation of the law which I find absolutely astonishing.
    Just to clarify, the blunder was that the Tribunal believed that information in historical records relating to 'investigations' was exempt even if it did not relate to confidential sources. In fact, unless there is a question of confidentiality, such information is not exempt if it is more than 30 years old.

    Confidentiality was the question on which the whole appeal depended, and the Tribunal made its decision in the belief that confidentiality was irrelevant!

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris
    replied
    Originally posted by Barrister View Post
    What is the status of the appeal? Can Casebooks subscribers help? Thanks
    Barrister
    The Tribunal refused leave to appeal. The decision is here:


    That decision acknowledges a blunder in the interpretation of the law which I find absolutely astonishing. The implication was that the Tribunal didn't actually know whether or not the disputed information was exempt from disclosure, but they excused themselves from making that decision because it would "involve a disproportionate amount of time and effort". They concluded that "the greatest [sic] part of it" was exempt on the balance of probabilities, but obviously the law requires that all of it should be exempt on the balance of probabilities. What can one do?

    Leave a comment:


  • Barrister
    replied
    What is the status of the appeal? Can Casebooks subscribers help? Thanks
    Barrister

    Leave a comment:


  • Barrister
    replied
    Who is Wilson and what is Bushmills?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Byrne

    Hello Debs. Thanks.

    Is there a link to the "Byrne" who finagled knives for Phoenix Park?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Hi Debs. It's nice to see you trying your hand at a little research for a change, instead of leaving it to Trevor to do all the hard work.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    I have identified who the entry refers to along with the other names mentioned from the ledgers but after all the headaches and pain I suffered in getting them and subsequently identifying them I have decided to keep them to myself
    Was the Bushmill's reference anything to do with this?

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by RobertM View Post
    Melbourne, December 3rd - In connection with the Hawthorne Mystery, a Sydney resident named Wilson is reported to be missing; he was assaulted and robbed, and gave a man in charge for this offence.
    At the trial Wilson did not appear to prosecute, and a warrant was issued for his arrest as an unwilling witness, but he was never found.
    The detectives have received two anonymous letters concluding with the words 'beware of Jack the Ripper'.

    Coincendence?
    I have identified who the entry refers to along with the other names mentioned from the ledgers but after all the headaches and pain I suffered in getting them and subsequently identifying them I have decided to keep them to myself

    Leave a comment:


  • RobertM
    replied
    Does this have a link to 'Wilson'?

    Melbourne, December 3rd - In connection with the Hawthorne Mystery, a Sydney resident named Wilson is reported to be missing; he was assaulted and robbed, and gave a man in charge for this offence.
    At the trial Wilson did not appear to prosecute, and a warrant was issued for his arrest as an unwilling witness, but he was never found.
    The detectives have received two anonymous letters concluding with the words 'beware of Jack the Ripper'.

    Coincendence?

    Leave a comment:


  • niko
    replied
    Appeal ?

    Dodgy buisness the appeal, with what I've seen in the press about the British Police force and some British Newspaper's lately, all the best of luck any way Trevor. " Justice ".......

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    good luck

    Hello Trevor. Best of luck.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    New appeal

    I would like to inform the community that after studying the Tribunals decision notice. I am of the opinion that there are two separate grounds for seeking leave to appeal to The Upper Tribunal.

    One is on a point of law, the second is with regards to proceedure.

    On the first I am asking for the decison to be set aside and my appeal allowed.

    On the second I am asking for the decison to be set aside and a new tribunal convened before a new Judge and new members.

    I have submitted the notice of appeal and must now await another Judge considering the appeal grounds. He will then either rule on one or both as to whether there are sufficient grounds for the matter to be sent to The Upper Tribunal.

    As an when that decison is known I will update everyone.

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil Carter
    replied
    Hello Hunter,

    Looks to me like a hurried bodge-job of an article. It must be remembered that the Sunday newspapers were full of one story only that day.. the phone hacking story.

    best wishes

    Phil

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X