Hi Lynn.
I agree that the question was open for a short time, but not indefinitely.
I'm pretty sure that the discussions in Parliament occurred within a week of the murder of Mary Kelly- in other words, while the investigation was still new & ongoing.
While the case was so fresh, wasn't it only reasonable of the Home Secretary to be open to certain possibilities which might have occurred, and to subsequently discard those 'possibilities' when no evidence was found pointing to them?
Anyway, I'm kinda sleepy now... I'll give you time to reload, OK?![Wink](https://forum.casebook.org/core/images/smilies/wink.png)
Cheers,
Archaic
I agree that the question was open for a short time, but not indefinitely.
I'm pretty sure that the discussions in Parliament occurred within a week of the murder of Mary Kelly- in other words, while the investigation was still new & ongoing.
While the case was so fresh, wasn't it only reasonable of the Home Secretary to be open to certain possibilities which might have occurred, and to subsequently discard those 'possibilities' when no evidence was found pointing to them?
Anyway, I'm kinda sleepy now... I'll give you time to reload, OK?
![Wink](https://forum.casebook.org/core/images/smilies/wink.png)
Cheers,
Archaic
Comment