It has historically been true that the resolution of naturally occurring phenomena, that evolutions in understandings has lead to breakthroughs in "true" understanding. Sunrise is an excellent example of this. When the western cultural frame of reference was the earth as the center of the universe, the saying "sunrise" made sense, the earth was not moving, rather the sun rose. We now understand that the universe is not centered on our pathetically small and insignificant existence, and the phenomena formerly known as sunrise is in fact a function of the earths rotation.
How is this pertinent? Ask yourself how the observed phenomena of dawn would appear if the sun actually moved, the answer is it would look the same. Yet, it is clearly not the same thing.
The paradigm of changing frame of reference allowing a more correct understanding works best for non human phenomena. We have many branches of study, all across the world, still dedicated to understanding human behavior.We do not have all the answers.
Couple this with the fact that situational information always diminish with time in historical studies and you have a couple of very severe limitations that make any modern solution highly speculative, and any emotional defense of how clever you were to "solve" this mystery truly ridiculous and laughable. This is not because people are not clever, by definition they are, It is merely a limitation of the activity the human is involved in. Saying you solved this mystery, in my book, is like saying you talked to your long dead grandma last night. Dave
How is this pertinent? Ask yourself how the observed phenomena of dawn would appear if the sun actually moved, the answer is it would look the same. Yet, it is clearly not the same thing.
The paradigm of changing frame of reference allowing a more correct understanding works best for non human phenomena. We have many branches of study, all across the world, still dedicated to understanding human behavior.We do not have all the answers.
Couple this with the fact that situational information always diminish with time in historical studies and you have a couple of very severe limitations that make any modern solution highly speculative, and any emotional defense of how clever you were to "solve" this mystery truly ridiculous and laughable. This is not because people are not clever, by definition they are, It is merely a limitation of the activity the human is involved in. Saying you solved this mystery, in my book, is like saying you talked to your long dead grandma last night. Dave
Comment