Leather Apron

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tom_Wescott
    Commissioner
    • Feb 2008
    • 6996

    #151
    Wickerman's drawings

    Wickerman's explanation is very sound and accounts for the broken nose visible in the photograph. But she must have been unconscious before all this took place, as she was already on the ground and did not struggle.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Comment

    • mariab
      Superintendent
      • Jun 2010
      • 2977

      #152
      Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
      Leather Apron was supposed to be fairly powerful. His eyes and grin were supposed to be malignant and repellant. I presume that, when confronted with this chap, many were delighted to part with 2d rather that continue the confrontation.
      Hmmm, just figured I share a few common traits with Leatherface – err, Leather Apron. That's presumably the reason why I'm getting all the funding I ask for – for conferences and research. At least I assume this must be the reason. :-p
      Who said anything about a broken nose? Eddowes' nose looks like cut with a sharp knife, not broken. I'm sorta familiar with broken noses, have broken mine about 4 times. And no visible signs left and it doesn't even hurt (much).
      Best regards,
      Maria

      Comment

      • lynn cates
        Commisioner
        • Aug 2009
        • 13841

        #153
        a word to the (not so) wise

        Hello Maria.

        "That's presumably the reason why I'm getting all the funding I ask for – for conferences and research."

        Hmm, could you have a word with my chair? (heh-heh)

        Cheers.
        LC

        Comment

        • mariab
          Superintendent
          • Jun 2010
          • 2977

          #154
          the secrets of acquired $$ funding

          Done deal, Lynn. That is, if you'd agree to give me a little money every day.
          Best regards,
          Maria

          Comment

          • Tom_Wescott
            Commissioner
            • Feb 2008
            • 6996

            #155
            Originally posted by mariab
            Who said anything about a broken nose? Eddowes' nose looks like cut with a sharp knife, not broken.
            I was referring to Wickerman's drawings of Nichols, nothing to do with Eddowes. Surely I'm not the only one who has noticed Polly's broken nose in the photograph? Dr. Llewellyn missed it, but no surprise there. Could be an old break, but it doesn't look like it had been reset, so probably fresh. Anyway, Wick's explanation of the face wounds also explains the nose.

            Yours truly,

            Tom Wescott

            Comment

            • Wickerman
              Commissioner
              • Oct 2008
              • 14865

              #156
              Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
              Hello Jon. Thanks.

              In Annie's case, let's assume that she scratched herself. That is indeed consistent with wishing to remove the ligature. But, unless the hands strangling are immobile, it is also consistent with manual strangulation.

              As for Polly, Dr. Llewellyn thought the bruise resulted from a thumb OR a blow.

              Cheers.
              LC
              Hi Lynn.
              If you read Dr. Phillips's conclusions about Annie's scratches, he describes a similar hold as I show on Polly in those drawings, and this maybe so.
              If the scratches were indeed high (1.5-2.0") under the lobe of the left ear then Phillips may be correct. I just have trouble seeing how fingers in that position could leave perpendicular scratches (assuming "contrary" means vertical, as opposed to the horizontal cut).
              I'm sure the killer held her head in that way regardless.


              Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
              Wickerman's explanation is very sound and accounts for the broken nose visible in the photograph. But she must have been unconscious before all this took place, as she was already on the ground and did not struggle.
              Thankyou Tom, certainly she was unconscious when her throat was cut.
              A genuine ligature mark on a corpse is shown here:



              We can't say whether time is a factor in defining the line on the neck, but as you can see the killer should have little trouble running his knife through the ligature mark to obliterate evidence of its use.


              Originally posted by mariab View Post
              ...Who said anything about a broken nose? Eddowes' nose looks like cut with a sharp knife, not broken.
              Maria, snap out of it, we're talking about Polly Nichols here. We are on the Leather Apron thread, even I am courting a severe reprimand by talking about Polly and you introduce Eddowes?

              I'm sorta familiar with broken noses, have broken mine about 4 times.
              Y'er headin' fer anuther lass


              All the best, Jon S.
              Regards, Jon S.

              Comment

              • mariab
                Superintendent
                • Jun 2010
                • 2977

                #157
                To Wick:
                So sorry, I mistook your drawing for Eddowes in haste.

                Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
                ISurely I'm not the only one who has noticed Polly's broken nose in the photograph? Dr. Llewellyn missed it, but no surprise there. Could be an old break, but it doesn't look like it had been reset, so probably fresh. Anyway, Wick's explanation of the face wounds also explains the nose.
                I'm looking it up right now, but the casebook Nichols postmortem pic is too small, from the wrong angle, and doesn't download on my malfunctioning comp (where I was hoping to magnify it).
                In my experience there are 2 ways to break one's nose: One where it gets as broad upstairs as downstairs and needs to be “pushed in“ (got that once in a whipeout when surfing), and one where it bleeds profusely for a while but hardly hurts at all. (Got that thrice, when eating a swimming pool wall twice, and a door on my face once.) In both cases, nose fully heals in about 3 weeks tops, no signs left. Unless it wasn't “properly“ broken, like in boxing. But even in boxing, sometimes there are no signs left, like a misshaped nose, so not sure how it works.
                Best regards,
                Maria

                Comment

                • Bridewell
                  Commissioner
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 4038

                  #158
                  I'm looking it up right now, but the casebook Nichols postmortem pic is too small
                  Hi Maria,

                  It's used to illustrate Christer's article in Ripperologist 126 if you have access to it.

                  Regards, Bridewell.
                  Last edited by Bridewell; 06-25-2012, 09:20 PM.
                  I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                  Comment

                  • mariab
                    Superintendent
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 2977

                    #159
                    Thanks so much Bridewell, I haven't received Rip #126 yet, but I'm sure it's on its way.
                    Last edited by mariab; 06-25-2012, 09:49 PM.
                    Best regards,
                    Maria

                    Comment

                    • lynn cates
                      Commisioner
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 13841

                      #160
                      first hand

                      Hello Jon. Thanks. I agree that, at times, the wording from inquest is a bit vague.

                      Would it not be lovely to see the wounds first hand? No more guessing.

                      Cheers.
                      LC

                      Comment

                      • Michael W Richards
                        Inactive
                        • May 2012
                        • 7122

                        #161
                        Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
                        How is a woman expected to see crazy and evil eyes in a man in darkness.

                        In my lifetime i havent seen to many men or women with crazy and evil looks in their eyes except on here !
                        Hi Trevor,

                        Long time since weve spoken. The way I see this is that the women were not accosted or threatened or whathaveyou in the dark corners of the streets, when the women were in dark corners they were working. He likely shakes them down on the way from a liason, when they had money,.. hence, its not kosher to assume there wasnt adequate light.

                        Hi again Lynn,

                        Those comments seem to indicate the eyes were seen clearly, a subtle change of facial expression from blank to a sly grin also seen.

                        I agree Lynn the women werent ready to prepare their best defense, but I believe 2 later Canonicals might have posed a challenge. I recall speaking with I believe it was Hunter long ago, and he described techniques where subduing the victim is a matter of second or fractions thereof.

                        Even a garrote or ligature skillfully employed can substitute well for an overpowering kind of attack. Not all of them struggled.

                        Strong forearms maybe, from slicing up some of those huge hogs that dot the landscape in your north lands.

                        Cheers Lynn, Trevor.

                        Mike R

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X