Tweet
I have seen some of you artists do great things with the famous MJK crime scene photo. like adding flesh to give an idea of what she may have looked like and adding color for blood, etc etc.
I would like to request that someone do something with the second MJK photo that was taken from the opposite side of the bed.
in this photo, we basically have half a picture. I would like to see someone add the other half of the picture.
the reason for this request is that for me, the two MJK photos don't add up. I have seen it debated about whether the finger in the second photo is supposed to be a pinky or a thumb. I know it's SUPPOSED to be a pinky but for the life of me, it looks like a thumb.
also, in the first photo, the entrails on the table seem to be about level with MJK's left shoulder. if the finger in the second photo is a pinky, then the entrails on the table aren't anywhere close to where they are in relation to the first photo. I realize they are taken at slightly different angles, but I don't see where there would be that much of a difference.
also, in the second picture on the right, what is that poking up? I assume it's supposed to be her left leg, bent at the knee. but in the first photo, her left leg is clearly not angled up like that.
my thoughts:
1. the table with the entrails was moved when the bed was moved to accomodate for the camera and was not moved back to it's original position. this is understandable. however, I still would not understand why they would pose her leg like that for the second photo.
or
2. the finger in the second photo IS a thumb and the photo itself is a reverse negative photo, like a mirror image. if this were the case, it would put everything about even with the first photo. the bulge that is angled up, instead of being a knee, would be either the chest, left shoulder, or the back of her head, covered with a sheet.
if the photo is not a reverse negative, can anyone explain why this photo would've been taken? I assume the focus would be the entrails on the table, but it's so far back that it appears the focus of the photo is the bulge that is angled up.
If anyone can add their thoughts, or preferably, use your artistic skills to add the other half of the photo, I'd appreciate it.
I started to do it myself, but I'm not too good with putting artistic ability through a computer. basically, I did it on paintbrush.
I would like to request that someone do something with the second MJK photo that was taken from the opposite side of the bed.
in this photo, we basically have half a picture. I would like to see someone add the other half of the picture.
the reason for this request is that for me, the two MJK photos don't add up. I have seen it debated about whether the finger in the second photo is supposed to be a pinky or a thumb. I know it's SUPPOSED to be a pinky but for the life of me, it looks like a thumb.
also, in the first photo, the entrails on the table seem to be about level with MJK's left shoulder. if the finger in the second photo is a pinky, then the entrails on the table aren't anywhere close to where they are in relation to the first photo. I realize they are taken at slightly different angles, but I don't see where there would be that much of a difference.
also, in the second picture on the right, what is that poking up? I assume it's supposed to be her left leg, bent at the knee. but in the first photo, her left leg is clearly not angled up like that.
my thoughts:
1. the table with the entrails was moved when the bed was moved to accomodate for the camera and was not moved back to it's original position. this is understandable. however, I still would not understand why they would pose her leg like that for the second photo.
or
2. the finger in the second photo IS a thumb and the photo itself is a reverse negative photo, like a mirror image. if this were the case, it would put everything about even with the first photo. the bulge that is angled up, instead of being a knee, would be either the chest, left shoulder, or the back of her head, covered with a sheet.
if the photo is not a reverse negative, can anyone explain why this photo would've been taken? I assume the focus would be the entrails on the table, but it's so far back that it appears the focus of the photo is the bulge that is angled up.
If anyone can add their thoughts, or preferably, use your artistic skills to add the other half of the photo, I'd appreciate it.
I started to do it myself, but I'm not too good with putting artistic ability through a computer. basically, I did it on paintbrush.
Comment