Most ridiculous suspect

[Herlock Sholmes]

You missed the whole point of the dicussion . Suggest you go back to the word ''clueless'' from herlock.

This is what I said Fishy.

Anyone that dismisses Druitt out of hand is simply clueless

So unless I’ve somehow managed to alter my post I don’t see how you can continue with the point. It’s quite clear what I meant. Not that anyone who doesn’t think Druitt is a reasonable suspect is clueless but anyone who simply dismisses him out of hand and without proper consideration.

So why are you objecting to something that I never said?

[Herlock Sholmes]

Regardles of all that there is a mountain of evidence that suggest he wasnt the killer.

Like?

[FISHY1118]

Im sorry Fishy but I sense that you’re indulging in a bit of wish-thinking here because Sickert is an integral part of the theory that you favour. If someone revealed evidence that Druitt was in France, apparently enjoying himself, 2 days before an accepted ripper murder (and accepting that travel was slower in those days), at the very least I’d have to admit that this would point to a probability that he wasn’t present at the murder. It’s not 100% proof of course and I haven’t claimed that but by anyone’s standards it’s a powerful point against him.

I think youve lost your way ion this topic , hint ''clueless'', you should go back and work out why i objected to it i the first place .

[FISHY1118]

Sorry Fishy but you’re simply making things up. Druitt’s cricket playing has been researched in depth and there is absolutely nothing that prevents him from being the ripper on that score (and believe me, people have tried.) Again, and just because some people have a tendency to equate me saying that Druitt is a reasonable suspect with me saying that he was definitely the ripper, we cannot eliminate Druitt - but that applies to many suspects of course. It’s down to our individual judgment to decide how strong or weak a suspect he is. If someone considers him a weak suspect then that’s fine, I don’t lose sleep over it, but its still baffling why people will go to any lengths to try and get him out of the way though.

t’s down to our individual judgment to decide how strong or weak a suspect he is. If someone considers him a weak suspect then that’s fine,

isnt that better than clueless ? thats the best post youve had all week .

[FISHY1118]

Like?

for people to make a point he wasnt the killer

[FISHY1118]

This is what I said Fishy.



So unless I’ve somehow managed to alter my post I don’t see how you can continue with the point. It’s quite clear what I meant. Not that anyone who doesn’t think Druitt is a reasonable suspect is clueless but anyone who simply dismisses him out of hand and without proper consideration.

So why are you objecting to something that I never said?

clueless is clueless , you know what you ment

[Herlock Sholmes]

clueless is clueless , you know what you ment

I was hoping for a more honest response Fishy. It’s pretty weak to tell me what I ‘meant,’ when what I ‘meant,’ is there very clearly and very specifically for anyone to read. You got it wrong. Why is it such a big deal for some people to admit to being wrong?

[Herlock Sholmes]

Just to repeat

. Anyone that dismisses Druitt out of hand is simply clueless

In black and white and not a mirage. Impossible to misinterpret but you’ve managed to.

[FISHY1118]

I was hoping for a more honest response Fishy. It’s pretty weak to tell me what I ‘meant,’ when what I ‘meant,’ is there very clearly and very specifically for anyone to read. You got it wrong. Why is it such a big deal for some people to admit to being wrong?

it was honest , i cant help if i think thats how you ment it , im just being honest , so we disagree . people do it all the time .

[FISHY1118]

Just to repeat




In black and white and not a mirage. Impossible to misinterpret but you’ve managed to.

Why not , you manage to misinterpret my post all the time .

[The Baron]

it was honest , i cant help if i think thats how you ment it , im just being honest , so we disagree . people do it all the time .

Agree with you Fishy, you were honest, others are just playing words, there is no such thing as dismissing Druitt out of hand, this phrase means NOTHING, so don't give it a lot of thought.

People dismiss Druitt because he is ridiculous as a suspect.

Abberline dismissed it, and stated that there is absolutely nothing to it.



The Baron

[FISHY1118]

Agree with you Fishy, you were honest, others are just playing words, there is no such thing as dismissing Druitt out of hand, this phrase means NOTHING, so don't give it a lot of thought.

People dismiss Druitt because he is ridiculous as a suspect.

Abberline dismissed it, and stated that there is absolutely nothing to it.



The Baron

Thanks Baron, i appreciate your response .

[Wickerman]

But - hey - it's actually not open for debate! Countless posters testify that the letters 'F' and 'M' are clear on Kelly's wall and yet only I on this site believe that the scrapbook is Maybrick's so they aren't biased.

The reason 'countless posters' see those 'letters' is because those same 'countless posters' believe the theory.
I can make countless Casebook members see anything I want them to see, even you.

Look at what I've drawn below at left, then see the untouched image on the right.
If you look close enough you can see the numbers & the faces I've drawn.


I'd say the green markings are two ears with a couple of whiskers showing - its more like Felix the Cat!

I'll guarantee I have just made everyone who looked at this post see things they never knew were there, and what is worse. They will forever see those numbers & figures every time they look at the original photograph. Thats the way the mind works.

[FISHY1118]

The reason 'countless posters' see those 'letters' is because those same 'countless posters' believe the theory.
I can make countless Casebook members see anything I want them to see, even you.

Look at what I've drawn below at left, then see the untouched image on the right.
If you look close enough you can see the numbers & the faces I've drawn.


I'd say the green markings are two ears with a couple of whiskers showing - its more like Felix the Cat!

I'll guarantee I have just made everyone who looked at this post see things they never knew were there, and what is worse. They will forever see those numbers & figures every time they look at the original photograph. Thats the way the mind works.

If i knew how to do that i could outline a extra terrestrial figure, head and body, all the way down the left hand side . Wick can you draw it in if you see it ?

[Abby Normal]

If i knew how to do that i could outline a extra terrestrial figure, head and body, all the way down the left hand side . Wick can you draw it in if you see it ?

lol i see it! although looks more like a skeletal zombie like figure with staring eyes