Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Most ridiculous suspect

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 31
         
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 31 template Next
  • #46
    Originally posted by AdamWalsh View Post
    I dont know about that - I always thought the "From Hell" graphic novel presented a strong case for Gull as the "Grand Architect". Doesnt seem so ridiculous to me.
    It's ridiculous to an extent when Gull was partially paralyzed on one side due to the strokes he suffered from 87-90.

    I'd have to say the following.

    1. Cream
    2. Maybrick
    3. Sickert
    4. Carroll
    5. Prince Albert Victor

    Regards,
    Justin
    They who dream by day are cognizant of many things which escape those who dream only by night. - Edgar Allan Poe

    Comment

    • #47
      Charles Lechmere., jill the ripper, Montague Druitt.
      'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

      Comment

      • #48
        Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

        Charles Lechmere., jill the ripper, Montague Druitt.


        Very much agree Fishy.

        Sometimes I find it difficult to decide who is more Lechmere or Druitt, both are unique in their ridiculous status as suspects, but it must be Druitt the clear winner here.

        I didn't mention Maybrick because he has nothing to do with this case, not even a person of interest.



        The Baron

        Comment

        • #49
          Regards

          Sir Herlock Sholmes.

          “A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”

          Comment

          • #50
            1. Lechmere
            2. Dusty Bin
            3. Mr Blobby
            Last edited by mpriestnall; 03-10-2022, 06:32 PM.
            Sapere Aude

            Comment

            • #51
              Maybrick is the most ridiculous, considering the amount of interest he draws. At least with most of the other suspects who are regularly discussed on here , whether you agree with them or not you can generate some form of case, even if it is on not much . But with Maybrick there is none, apart from a very obvious fake diary.
              Regards Darryl
              • Likes 1

              Comment

              • #52
                What about Van Gogh
                G U T

                There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

                Comment

                • #53
                  Originally posted by GUT View Post

                  What about Van Gogh

                  Still better than Druit or Lechmere.


                  The Baron

                  Comment

                  • #54
                    pound for pound its maybrick hands down.

                    and those saying lechmere or druitt-really? cmon-theyre two of the least weak suspects.
                    "Is all that we see or seem
                    but a dream within a dream?"
                    -Edgar Allan Poe


                    "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                    quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
                    -Frederick G. Abberline
                    • Likes 1

                    Comment

                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
                      pound for pound its maybrick hands down.

                      and those saying lechmere or druitt-really? cmon-theyre two of the least weak suspects.
                      ist that what were saying ?
                      'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                      Comment

                      • #56
                        Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post

                        ist that what were saying ?
                        yes it is. dont you know what you post?
                        "Is all that we see or seem
                        but a dream within a dream?"
                        -Edgar Allan Poe


                        "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                        quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
                        -Frederick G. Abberline

                        Comment

                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Jdombrowski89 View Post

                          It's ridiculous to an extent when Gull was partially paralyzed on one side due to the strokes he suffered from 87-90.

                          I'd have to say the following.

                          1. Cream
                          2. Maybrick
                          3. Sickert
                          4. Carroll
                          5. Prince Albert Victor

                          Regards,
                          Justin
                          Taking knight aside and his reason for Gull being jtr , the above statement about Gull is false, he was not partially paralyzed down one side at all during the time the murders were being committed.There is more than enough evidence to show [if one chooses to bother to look] that he had a minor stroke for which he fully recovered from during that time. So Gull for what ever reason , on his own, just as any other suspect, i believe could have been capable ''physically'' of committing the crimes .
                          'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                          Comment

                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

                            yes it is. dont you know what you post?
                            .
                            yes i do , was curious as to why you wrote. really? . No big deal tho
                            'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                            Comment

                            • #59
                              Originally posted by GUT View Post
                              What about Van Gogh
                              I'm with you GUT, Van Gogh plus Carroll, Prince Albert Victor and Ostrog.

                              Cheers, George
                              Opposing opinions doesn't mean opposing sides, in my view, it means attacking the problem from both ends. - Wickerman​

                              ​Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm

                              Comment

                              • #60
                                Van Gogh, Maybrick, Sickert

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 14 31 template Next
                                Working...
                                X