Hello all,
The thread concerns one of the methods the police routinely use when they intend to draw a criminal to them with the intent to capture them or to contain a criminal when they know the whereabouts. Its a method that is used to keep "subject(s)" within a police patrolled border. Its the setting up of a "Net".
One of the reasons I remain somewhat skeptical about an automatic inclusion of Catharine Eddowes to the Canonical Group is that from my perspective the 7 or 8 people that were closest to her when she is killed are active or retired police officers. There was Pearce and another City constable residing in the square itself...(I cant recall the other PC's name)...there was Marriot, Halse and Outram looking through nearby streets and lanes, there was Morris the nightwatchman, there was Harvey that looked into the square from one direction and then Watkins who entered the square from another.
Could the square be considered within a police "net" that night?
All responses are welcomed.
Best regards
The thread concerns one of the methods the police routinely use when they intend to draw a criminal to them with the intent to capture them or to contain a criminal when they know the whereabouts. Its a method that is used to keep "subject(s)" within a police patrolled border. Its the setting up of a "Net".
One of the reasons I remain somewhat skeptical about an automatic inclusion of Catharine Eddowes to the Canonical Group is that from my perspective the 7 or 8 people that were closest to her when she is killed are active or retired police officers. There was Pearce and another City constable residing in the square itself...(I cant recall the other PC's name)...there was Marriot, Halse and Outram looking through nearby streets and lanes, there was Morris the nightwatchman, there was Harvey that looked into the square from one direction and then Watkins who entered the square from another.
Could the square be considered within a police "net" that night?
All responses are welcomed.
Best regards
Comment