Anyone know anything more about this?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
James Carnac memoirs
Collapse
X
-
I can find only one "James Carnac" in the census of 1891. Rather well-to-do, he was a 44 year-old Baronet living on his own means in Weybridge, Surrey. He and Lady Carnac (a Cornwall lass) had three children, aged between 11 and 14, all of whom were born in Kensington, London.Kind regards, Sam Flynn
"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
-
Deja vu all over again?
Ripper historian Paul Begg has seen extracts of the manuscript and said it was the earliest Ripper 'autobiography' and as such was an important piece of 'Ripperature'.
He said: "Although this is almost beyond question a work of fiction, as a product of the late 1920s it is a very early piece of 'Ripperature'.
"There are several reasons for thinking that it is a work of fiction, not the least of which is the 'feel' of the text, which reads more like a story than a narrative by the actual author."
But if it is a fake, it would have been a very well-researched fake, said Mr Begg.
He added: "There are some statements which do seem, perhaps, to be very accurate."
Comment
-
Grave:
I was gonna suggest that Carnac didn't have a leg to stand on....but he does. One.
Look for non-ambulatory, wannabe Ripper diarists within the next few years.
Sammy...one Carnac I found was Sir James Carnac, the one time Governor of Bombay, but he predated One Legged Jimmy by 50 years.Last edited by Howard Brown; 10-28-2009, 03:41 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam Flynn View PostI can find only one "James Carnac" in the census of 1891. Rather well-to-do, he was a 44 year-old Baronet living on his own means in Weybridge, Surrey. He and Lady Carnac (a Cornwall lass) had three children, aged between 11 and 14, all of whom were born in Kensington, London.
But if the article is correct in dating this document to the late 1920s, the baronet could not be the author.
Comment
-
-
Another likely "James Carnac".
I am wondering if the “ James Carnac” we are looking for, is in fact, Sir Claud James Rivett-Carnac.
Born in December 1877, succeeded his father to the baronetcy in 1909, stayed at the family seat in Southwater Sussex for a while but got sick of it!
Apparently, this was the second time he had flitted; the first time was a break with his family while young, when he went off to South Africa where he served in the Cape Mounted Police. Then in the Boer War where he received a medal with five clasps.SErvedin World War One under an assumed name.
He relented and returned to Sussex in 1908, and succeeded to the family crest in 1909.
Then another row and off he went again. South Africa, California and Canada.
By 1922 his cousin in New Zealand (V.C. Rivett-Carnac) was pleading for anyone knowing his whereabouts to contact his poor dear mother.
Should they fail to locate Claud James R-C, his cousin, William Percival, would succeed to the title in his stead.
My source for all this is a digitised Australian newspaper site:
<<http://www.nla newspapers beta >>
Which is the National Library of Australia. An extremely useful secondary research source. Rather like regional British newspapers.
Newspapers cited are principally: “The Argus” Melbourne ( 26 July 1922 p.10.And ditto 27 July 1922 p.6. And ditto 30 September, 1922 p.31). JOHN RUFFELS
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostRipper historian Paul Begg has seen extracts of the manuscript and said it was the earliest Ripper 'autobiography' and as such was an important piece of 'Ripperature'.
He said: "Although this is almost beyond question a work of fiction, as a product of the late 1920s it is a very early piece of 'Ripperature'.
"There are several reasons for thinking that it is a work of fiction, not the least of which is the 'feel' of the text, which reads more like a story than a narrative by the actual author."
But if it is a fake, it would have been a very well-researched fake, said Mr Begg.
He added: "There are some statements which do seem, perhaps, to be very accurate."
Comment
Comment