Zulu influences?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cap'n Jack
    replied
    You all need to chill out there, Trev, I gotta spare fridge if you need it.
    It seems quite obvious to me that there were no medical students involved, or even present at or in any of the PM's carried out on the victims... but rather a couple of old lags whose only interest in an organ would have been grinding one. Now all we need is a monkey.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    gentlemen
    i would urge you to read up on the Anatomy Act 1832 this clearly permits bona fide medical personell to use bodies and body parts for reserach. Students would come under that banner i would suggest.

    There are a number of provisos one of which related to bodies of people dying in the workhouse. My point here is that Annie Chapmas body was taken to a workhouse building used as a mortuary.

    So i would suggest all you people who subscribe to the theory that jack removed the organs at the scene should really have a re think.

    There are a number of intersting article to be found on the Anatomy Act so DYOR.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cap'n Jack
    replied
    Trev likes the remarkable though, Sam, like ships that should be in the Port of London while they is really limping around the island of Madeira wivout rudder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    Wouldnt it be ironic if the students took the organs from the bodies whilst they were laying around waiting for the post mortems to be carried out !!!!!!!!
    Indeed - and remarkable, too, Trevor. There were different mortuaries used in different murders, with different mortuary attendants working in each - few (if any) of whom were students.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Wouldnt it be ironic if the students took the organs from the bodies whilst they were laying around waiting for the post mortems to be carried out !!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • perrymason
    Guest replied
    If the first 2 victims were killed for the reason the medical authorities who examined them thought,....then the killer could well have been influenced by the story of Burke and Hare rather than anything as exotic as Zulu Warriors. He could have been influenced by extreme poverty to become susceptible to being influenced by Burke and Hare, and with an acknowledged real incident regarding 1 of 2 Teaching Hospitals the previous year,....if the killer had taken uteri from both of the first 2 victims he could have had what amounts to be the equivalent today of some 3,000L Sterling.

    For myself, I would never eliminate this possibility for the first 2 victims unless proven otherwise.

    Of course I dont believe that the same man who killed those 2 killed many, or perhaps any, others....so the fact that the 3 remaining women were not killed for their uterus isnt a major issue to me. Burke and Hare shows us that many organs could be sold to students, ......perhaps the kidney that finds its way to Mr Lusk was obtained in that manner.....wouldnt it be ironic if the killer who took Kates kidney sold it to students who hoaxed a package from Jack?

    All the best

    Leave a comment:


  • Archaic
    replied
    Influences

    I think it's reasonable to believe that whoever the Ripper was, as a boy, a youth, and a man he would have been exposed to a myriad of stories about Zulu, Indian, Turkish, and Native American fighting methods.

    Victorian newspapers, magazines and books seemed to make a veritable cult out of reporting "Fiendish Massacres and Mutilations", and these usually focused in ghastly detail upon outrages committed against white women.

    Who knows what sort of strange and bloody ideas such atrocities might have conjured in an already abnormal imagination? The man who grew up to be the Ripper might have been particularly drawn to this subject matter from childhood- and that's in addition to all the crime reports, murders, etc., he would have heard about.

    Best regards, Archaic

    Leave a comment:


  • Cap'n Jack
    replied
    I don't believe the killer would have been a veteran of the Zulu Wars but I do believe he would have read about them in popular accounts of the time; and this may have influenced his motive, and method.

    Leave a comment:


  • smezenen
    replied
    Did the British Army teach hand to hand fighting techniques back then? And If so what style or discipline did they teach?

    Leave a comment:


  • Captain Hook
    replied
    Out of Africa

    Doug et al.

    It's a bit late in the day for me to enter this discussion, but I only came across this thread a couple of days ago. I did indeed write an article for Ripperologist entitled Out of Africa where I suggested the Ripper might have been a veteran of the Zulu war. For what it may be worth, the article is available in Dissertations right here in the Casebook.

    Cheers
    Eduardo (aka Captain Hook)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    I love the Xhosa/Zulu word for the short, stabbing spear that was used in conjunction with the assegai - it's called a "lxwa", named after the sucking noise made when the blade was withdrawn from the opponent's body. It's hard to convey the pronunciation of "lxwa" using English orthography, but this sound file will give you an idea.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Hinton
    replied
    Zulu link

    In my book 'From Hell' I put forward the idea that the weapon used was the head of an assegai. This came about from a strange knife I bought at an auction. It was very old, with a leaf blade, no quillions, a cord wrapped handle and a wooden plug like a cork stuck in the end.

    I took it to an expert in bladed weapons and he explained that after the Zulu wars a lot of soldiers took assegais as souvenirs. They couldn't carry them in their luggage ( officers could) and so snapped the heads off.

    When they got home they found that they made excellent knives, and would often wrap rawhide or cord around the socket to make a handle and plug the end with a cork or a piece of wood.

    The one thing that was obvious about this knife was even after all this time it was as sharp as a razor.

    Leave a comment:


  • Supe
    replied
    Doug,

    Interesting that you should bring that up because in Ripperologist 100-part 2, which came our yesterday, in the history of Ripperologist section Eduardo Zinna mused in part:
    I soon started to submit articles to Ripperologist: a brief analysis of Lewis Carroll’s chances as the Ripper, an essay on Robert Bloch and an article suggesting that the Ripper could have been a Zulu warrior or a veteran of the battle of Isandwlana – but keeping my tongue firmly in my cheek. I pinched the title of that article, Out of Africa, from Pliny the Elder and Isak Dinesen, and its first line from Oscar Wilde’s The Ballad of Reading Gaol

    Don.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mascara & Paranoia
    replied
    I doubt it. Though it depends on the length of the blade. Jack wouldn't have been able to tote a long knife with him and probably carried his in his jacket or trousers.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Grave Maurice
    replied
    Maybe. Of the wounds inflicted on Annie Chapman, Dr Phillips said: "They could have been done by such an instrument as a medical man used for post-mortem purposes, but the ordinary surgical cases might not contain such an instrument. Those used by the slaughtermen, well ground down, might have caused them."

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X