Animal Abuse
Collapse
X
-
Hi Diana,
It's a good thought, but I suspect that the man who got away with the ripper murders would have had no trouble experimenting on the odd furry creature without getting buckled for it.
Love,
Caz
X"Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov
-
Its posible of course though not all serial killers im thinking certainly of Sutcliffe here are animal abusers first.though more than a few are.its quite probable if he did start cutting up animals first he got off with it.its also possible if he worked in a slaughterhouse or as a butcher,he got through the animal cutting stage that way.
He could of course actually have loved animals.One of Hitlers closest relationships was with his dog.Being bad dont make you an animal abuser
Comment
-
It all depends on what you mean by "animal abuse". As an all-covering concept, no it wasn't, at least not in a form we'd recognise today. It should be remembered, however, that many of the old gaming "sports" such as c**k {I don't believe I've had to alter that} fighting had been outlawed. Things were beginiing to happen, but no one had so far decided to widen the field to cover all incidents of animal cruelty. Remember, it was only very recently that we ourselves got rid of hunting, a destestably cruel and sadistic pastime by anyone's standards. Oh dear, now I've done it...Originally posted by kensei View PostI'd be a little surprised to learn that animal abuse was even a crime in Victorian England. Anyone know?"If you listen to the tills you can hear the bells toll. You can hear what a state we're in".
Comment
-
Would a pyromaniac JTR not have burnt the bodies though??Originally posted by Frank View PostAs far as I know is fire raising another early sign. Maybe there are reports of such events in or around Whitechapel five or ten years prior to the murders, although I would suppose that fires were not uncommon then.
Comment
-
There's certainly some evidence to back up your suspicions, Frank. Certainly Peter Kurten confessed that in his early days he was not only a serial animal abuser, but also had a thing for fires and road accidents.Originally posted by Frank View PostAs far as I know is fire raising another early sign. Maybe there are reports of such events in or around Whitechapel five or ten years prior to the murders, although I would suppose that fires were not uncommon then."If you listen to the tills you can hear the bells toll. You can hear what a state we're in".
Comment
-
I don't think that Frank is suggesting pyromania. The fire thing is more a voyeuristic activity.Originally posted by ianincleveland View PostWould a pyromaniac JTR not have burnt the bodies though??"If you listen to the tills you can hear the bells toll. You can hear what a state we're in".
Comment
-
Can see that if he had a voyeurisitc thing for fires hed still have burnt the bodies to add to his thrill and indeed to destroy evidence.Originally posted by The English Gardener View PostI don't think that Frank is suggesting pyromania. The fire thing is more a voyeuristic activity.Last edited by ianincleveland; 02-11-2009, 03:57 PM.
Comment
-
I think the common thing in raising fires and killing people are power and control over people. They give the perpetrator the feeling of being powelful and important. They have the power to decide who will be alive, who will die or where it will burn ...
Comment

Comment