Puzzled

[Financeman]

Even though the murders where conducted differently doesnt mean the one killer didnt do it, thanks to mordern study of serial killers we know that certain types, sexual sadists, escalate the crime to escalate the thrill, in saying that whilst there is no evidence linking him to the other murders there is no evidence to say he didnt, only a theory. But here is something else to consider given the rapid escalation how do we know it was only one killer?
How do we know that it wasnt two working in tandem? since JTR to today we have since learnt that this can happen. Two killers at two totally different end of the sexual sadism spectrum? we dont, and we never will. A master and a apprentice if you will.

I do personally think that there was one and that due to the rapid de-escalation of the crimes in 89 tells me that he either died, incarcerated or became too ill to carry them out any longer. I need to do more specific research on the suspects but my for some reason I think the killer is outside of the suspect pool but not far.

[Uncle Jack]

Im grateful you dont espouse that Jack was also a quartet. You do seem to have already convinced yourself of the "facts".... so Im curious, what benefit is there for you in stating so here then?

We usually discuss various theories and ideas, go over researched data, pore over the literature and the press, and yet most here would not make such absolute remarks.

Best regards.

My apologies Michael. I should have stated in my post that it was my personal opinion, which is what I usually do. Personally, I think Jack did commit most of the Whitechapel murders but not all. I certainly don't think he murdered Emma Smith, in my opinion.

Again, I apologize Michael

Kind regards,

Adam