Originally posted by Al Bundy's Eyes
View Post
I think I would rather not.
I had some exchanges with him on Who were they?
He was unable to substantiate his claim that the term 'one-off' was already in use in 1888.
He also suggested that the murderer originally put Kelly's breasts on the table, then moved them, and then forgot he had moved them - in order to explain why the diary repeats the mistaken newspaper report that the breasts were found on the table.
But to return to my comparison of the Galveston story to the Maybrick Diary, the narrator in both cases makes no mention of any route taken, any street name, the time, the date, the conversation he had with his victim, any interruption, nor anything that might be termed inside information.
In the Galveston story, assuming it is the Nichols murder, why is there no mention of Lechmere's approach and the murderer's disappointment at not being able to finish the job?
If it is Tabram's murder, does his description of it seem apt when he had stabbed his victim 39 times?
Leave a comment: