Tweet
John:
Here's the deal. We're talking about photos that were taken 122 years ago! Back then, believe it or not, camera and photograph quality and technology was not exactly as advanced as it is today. There was no Photoshop in 1888. As a result, the majority of images we have in relation to these crimes (which really aren't that extensive) are of a fairly poor quality and, in some cases, completely unintelligible - by Garry and people of his kind taking the time and effort to clear up these photos and produce greater clarity, we can add something of a modern touch to old photographs.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with this. You should note that not all of the photos are death scene or mortuary photos, they are a variety of things, including the Abberline photo and Miller's Court. You've chosen to single out those particular images as some sort of suggestion that both Garry and those of us who choose to commend his work are some sort of sicko's.
And yet, once again, you continue to visit the thread and have obviously viewed them more than once. Did you really think when you came to study a serial killer that all of the images associated with it were going to be of cute young kittens playing in the spring dandelions?
Cheers,
Adam.
Here's the deal. We're talking about photos that were taken 122 years ago! Back then, believe it or not, camera and photograph quality and technology was not exactly as advanced as it is today. There was no Photoshop in 1888. As a result, the majority of images we have in relation to these crimes (which really aren't that extensive) are of a fairly poor quality and, in some cases, completely unintelligible - by Garry and people of his kind taking the time and effort to clear up these photos and produce greater clarity, we can add something of a modern touch to old photographs.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with this. You should note that not all of the photos are death scene or mortuary photos, they are a variety of things, including the Abberline photo and Miller's Court. You've chosen to single out those particular images as some sort of suggestion that both Garry and those of us who choose to commend his work are some sort of sicko's.
And yet, once again, you continue to visit the thread and have obviously viewed them more than once. Did you really think when you came to study a serial killer that all of the images associated with it were going to be of cute young kittens playing in the spring dandelions?
Cheers,
Adam.
Comment