Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Witnesses: 36 Berner Street............... - by The Station Cat 14 minutes ago.
Witnesses: 36 Berner Street............... - by The Station Cat 43 minutes ago.
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - by Spitfire 55 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - by packers stem 1 hour and 20 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: JtR failed amputation. Torso killer was successful. - by Fisherman 1 hour and 23 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: JtR failed amputation. Torso killer was successful. - by Fisherman 3 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Motive, Method and Madness: Geoprofile of Jack the Ripper reveals Tabram and Nichols connection. - (42 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: distances between kills.odd - (15 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - (9 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - (7 posts)
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - (5 posts)
Levy, Jacob: Jacob the Ripper - (5 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Scene of the Crimes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #121  
Old Yesterday, 08:06 AM
albie albie is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hull, Humberside
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Hysterical nonsense.

Dianetics is utter drivel created by a charlatan which is now used by one of the most sinister, damaging organisations on earth.

If your theory was valid people on here would respond accordingly but just like a typical bad loser you can only accuse everyone of being closed minded or too dumb to see it. Have you e er considered that there are people on here who have been studying the case for years and that they might know a bit more about it than you do?

Nope you resort to the conspiracy theory mantra of “we’ll they would say that wouldn’t they.”
>>Dianetics is utter drivel blah blah

There you again saying stuff but backing it up with no evidence. No wonder you are a ripperologist.

>>If your theory was valid people on here would respond accordingly but just like a typical bad loser you can only accuse everyone of being closed minded or too dumb to see it.

You have yet to prove my theory is invalid. I've been asking you for weeks now. No answer.

>>Have you e er considered that there are people on here who have been studying the case for years and that they might know a bit more about it than you do?

What of it? I know as much as I need to know. If my theory is not sound then demonstrate it. I'm all eyes. You call me a bad loser? HAHAHHA. Kettle calling pot I think is the term. And I bet the spout has melted.

You have continually failed to debunk my theory. You have lost and are not doing it well. I feel great about my theory now. The more you insult me and my theory the better I feel about it.

I'm right.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old Yesterday, 08:07 AM
albie albie is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hull, Humberside
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

Nope you resort to the conspiracy theory mantra of ďweíll they would say that wouldnít they.Ē
I haven't said that at all.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old Yesterday, 08:09 AM
albie albie is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hull, Humberside
Posts: 141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
The mindset that requires valid evidence.

We understand that you donít have to believe in magic to merit your theory by the way.
I don't think you do understand that. If you did you would accept my theory.

Valid evidence isn't also in the positive, it is in the negative.

You have provided none for the latter.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old Yesterday, 08:15 AM
albie albie is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hull, Humberside
Posts: 141
Default

To boil this down.

You have not debunked my theory.

Your attempts to do so are DISSAPOINTINGLY BAD.

Your grasp on logic is DISSAPOINTINGLY BAD AND MARRED BY YOUR SUBCONSCIOUS DENIAL OF THE EXISTENCE OF MAGIC.

I have a dozen or more correlations between Venus and the ripper killings that ALL CONNECT AND MAKE SENSE.

If you want to debunk it then come up with an analogous number of correlations to something else AND MAKE SENSE.

Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old Yesterday, 10:27 AM
Herlock Sholmes Herlock Sholmes is online now
Superintendent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: The West Midlands
Posts: 2,874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albie View Post
>>Dianetics is utter drivel blah blah

There you again saying stuff but backing it up with no evidence. No wonder you are a ripperologist.

I know that the moon isnít made of cheese but I donít feel the need to spend six months researching the subject to disprove it to the satisfaction of conspiracy theorists.

>>If your theory was valid people on here would respond accordingly but just like a typical bad loser you can only accuse everyone of being closed minded or too dumb to see it.

You have yet to prove my theory is invalid. I've been asking you for weeks now. No answer.

I have answered. Numbers and patterns arenít a basis for solid evidence because they are so malleable. Youíve interpreted them one way someone else might interpret them other ways. Therefore your theoryis your own interpretation which I choose not to accept. Please donít cry.


>>Have you e er considered that there are people on here who have been studying the case for years and that they might know a bit more about it than you do?

What of it? I know as much as I need to know. If my theory is not sound then demonstrate it. I'm all eyes. You call me a bad loser? HAHAHHA. Kettle calling pot I think is the term. And I bet the spout has melted.

Im not going to keep repeating myself.

You have continually failed to debunk my theory. You have lost and are not doing it well. I feel great about my theory now. The more you insult me and my theory the better I feel about it.

I'm right.

ďYou have lost.Ē ďI feel great about my theory.Ē ďIím right.Ē

Ego.


You are free to believe what you want and we are free to criticise it. You appear to be highly sensitive about your theory. Time will tell if itís accepted but I get the impression that as long as you believe it you feel that thatís enough.
__________________
Regards

Herlock






"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact!"
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old Yesterday, 10:28 AM
Herlock Sholmes Herlock Sholmes is online now
Superintendent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: The West Midlands
Posts: 2,874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albie View Post
I don't think you do understand that. If you did you would accept my theory.

Valid evidence isn't also in the positive, it is in the negative.

You have provided none for the latter.
So youíve categorically solved the case then?

Well done.

Can we move on?
__________________
Regards

Herlock






"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact!"
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old Yesterday, 10:32 AM
Herlock Sholmes Herlock Sholmes is online now
Superintendent
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: The West Midlands
Posts: 2,874
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albie View Post
To boil this down.

You have not debunked my theory.

Itís not a theory itís a work of imagination.

Your attempts to do so are DISSAPOINTINGLY BAD.

I apologise.

Your grasp on logic is DISSAPOINTINGLY BAD AND MARRED BY YOUR SUBCONSCIOUS DENIAL OF THE EXISTENCE OF MAGIC.

My denial of the existence of magic is not subconscious. Magic doesnít exist except in the minds of the gullible and the delusional.

I have a dozen or more correlations between Venus and the ripper killings that ALL CONNECT AND MAKE SENSE.

They make sense to a conspiracy theorist and to no one else.

If you want to debunk it then come up with an analogous number of correlations to something else AND MAKE SENSE.

I donít have as much time on my hands as you obviously do.

Please grow up.
__________________
Regards

Herlock






"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact!"
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.