Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Ben 1 hour and 10 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Was the ripper and also the torsomans crimes totally non sexual in nature? - by Michael W Richards 1 hour and 29 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by Simon Wood 15 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by Scott Nelson 15 hours ago.
Witnesses: Sarah and Maurice Lewis - by Paddy 15 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: Diary Quirks - by Mike J. G. 15 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (8 posts)
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (8 posts)
Witnesses: Sarah and Maurice Lewis - (6 posts)
Maybrick, James: And This Is Factual! - (4 posts)
Maybrick, James: New Thoughts On The “diary” - (2 posts)
Maybrick, James: Acquiring a Life - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Victims > General Victim Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2008, 07:03 PM
Uncle Jack Uncle Jack is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 576
Default Why No Murders In 1890??

So lets hear your theories about this one.... this is mostly for those who believe that Jack killed beyond the C5..... If, and I do state IF, Jack did kill beyond Mary Jane Kelly and continued to murder, why was there no murders that took place in 1890?? .....Or was there some murders or attacks in 1890 that went unnoticed that could have been overlooked? Were there any stabbings/knife attacks etc in 1890?? Or... could he have been away from London or been ill or even had a "rest" similar to BTK etc..?

Best regards

Adam
__________________
Best regards,
Adam


"They assumed Kelly was the last... they assumed wrong" - Me

Last edited by Uncle Jack : 10-23-2008 at 07:08 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2008, 04:43 PM
DarkPassenger DarkPassenger is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 358
Default

It's possible he took a break like Peter Sutcliffe did. He had a year where he did not kill.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2008, 05:24 PM
sdreid sdreid is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: McWopetaz Metroplex, Illinois U. S. of A.
Posts: 4,957
Default

There was the Phoebe Hogg murder in October of 1890 - a huge stretch of course.
__________________
This my opinion and to the best of my knowledge, that is, if I'm not joking.

Stan Reid
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2008, 08:00 PM
KatBradshaw KatBradshaw is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: York
Posts: 566
Default Again Mmmmmmmmm


One things that has always interested me about this is the idea of the gaps. Yes Sutcliffe had gaps but his attacks were more spaced out anyway. Jack's were so close together that I wonder what would have caused such a large gap!!!
__________________
In order to know virtue, we must first aquaint ourselves with vice!
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-15-2008, 08:37 PM
Uncle Jack Uncle Jack is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 576
Default

It is strange how there are no murders at all in Whitechapel when it was such a violent place in general. I was certain that there would be at least some sort of unsolved stabbing case. Very odd but not uncommon I suppose.
__________________
Best regards,
Adam


"They assumed Kelly was the last... they assumed wrong" - Me
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-23-2009, 02:11 PM
Uncle Jack Uncle Jack is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 576
Default

The whole 1890 gap is still a mystery to me. If Jack killed McKenzie and Coles, then there is a 19 month gap. Even if you believe that he killed the Pinchin Street victim, that is still a 17 month gap. Maybe he did suffer an illness for a certain length of time. Im surprised the press never attributed anything to the Ripper during this year.
__________________
Best regards,
Adam


"They assumed Kelly was the last... they assumed wrong" - Me
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-23-2009, 06:48 PM
Normy Normy is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 130
Default

If jack only did the C5 do you think it's possible he did them in a short period of time because he knew he didn't have a long period of time to commit the murders?
I mean that he might have known his days were numbered for some reason.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-24-2009, 09:21 AM
Nothing to see Nothing to see is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 338
Default

Your guess is as good as anyone else's. I think Jack did five then either died or was jailed or institionalised. If he went OS he'd have started again. I don't think Jack killed any other than those in the canon.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-27-2009, 06:27 AM
Pettifogger Pettifogger is offline
Cadet
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Columbia MO
Posts: 35
Default I've always thought...

timing was essential to JtR.

1890 wasn't the right time to kill for him. 1888 was perfect by his calender. July 1889 fit the bill. Apparently so did February 1891.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-27-2009, 03:15 PM
John Wheat John Wheat is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,773
Default

There were no murders in 1890 as Jack the Ripper didn't murder after 1889 and not in London after 1888.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.