Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Wickerman 15 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Was the ripper and also the torsomans crimes totally non sexual in nature? - by c.d. 34 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Wickerman 42 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Was the ripper and also the torsomans crimes totally non sexual in nature? - by Abby Normal 1 hour and 18 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Lechmere was Jack the Ripper - by Sam Flynn 2 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Lechmere was Jack the Ripper - by Trevor Marriott 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Lechmere was Jack the Ripper - (39 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (11 posts)
Torso Killings: torso maps - (10 posts)
Motive, Method and Madness: Was the ripper and also the torsomans crimes totally non sexual in nature? - (7 posts)
General Discussion: What Would an "Investigation" Consist of? - (2 posts)
Rippercast: Colin Wilson: Jack the Ripper Conference in Ipswich, 1996 - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Police Officials and Procedures > Anderson, Sir Robert

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-09-2011, 08:52 PM
Stewart P Evans Stewart P Evans is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,994
Default Context

To put what Anderson said into context it is only fair to quote the preceding paragraph also.

'I will merely add that the only person who had ever had a good view of the murderer unhesitatingly identified the suspect the instant he was confronted with him; but he refused to give evidence.
In saying that he was a Polish Jew I am merely stating a definitely ascertained fact.'

To me the meaning is clear, put simply the murderer was identified and was a Polish Jew, a definitely ascertained fact.

Others may put their own interpretation on it, but I see this as nothing more than an exercise in semantics.
__________________
SPE

Treat me gently I'm a newbie.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-09-2011, 08:59 PM
Stewart P Evans Stewart P Evans is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,994
Default Book

And as it appears in Anderson's book.

Name:  andersonbook1.jpg
Views: 379
Size:  227.0 KB
__________________
SPE

Treat me gently I'm a newbie.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-09-2011, 09:32 PM
GregBaron GregBaron is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 826
Default Unmentionable?

Thanks for posting the above Stewart, right from the Book even......

Anderson was probably right about the enterprising journalist not that we can extrapolate much from that....

I find the term unmentionable vices interesting, which perhaps suggests other horrors besides the murder and mutilation we are all aware of........does this infer that he knew other things?

Or is this simply the old masturbation story rearing its ugly head again (no pun intended)...

Greg
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-10-2011, 08:47 AM
Stewart P Evans Stewart P Evans is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,994
Default The latter

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregBaron View Post
Thanks for posting the above Stewart, right from the Book even......
Anderson was probably right about the enterprising journalist not that we can extrapolate much from that....
I find the term unmentionable vices interesting, which perhaps suggests other horrors besides the murder and mutilation we are all aware of........does this infer that he knew other things?
Or is this simply the old masturbation story rearing its ugly head again (no pun intended)...
Greg
Hi Greg, I think it's the latter ('rearing it's ugly head' as you say).
__________________
SPE

Treat me gently I'm a newbie.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-10-2011, 05:04 PM
GregBaron GregBaron is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 826
Default A conundrum wrapped in an enigma?

Quote:
Hi Greg, I think it's the latter ('rearing it's ugly head' as you say).
Thanks Stewart, that's what I thought. Darn. Every time I try to look further into words I come up empty.

I suppose Anderson is much like the case itself.....what's that saying......"an enigma, wrapped in a riddle, surrounded by a mystery.."

I sure hope somebody stumbles upon the missing link someday....

Greg
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-20-2012, 12:24 AM
Fleetwood Mac Fleetwood Mac is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,230
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregBaron View Post

Thanks Stewart, that's what I thought.
I think the following is pretty clear from chapter 9:

The house to house search

1) They were looking for a man who lived alone or had premises that he could use in the immediate vicinity.
2) They satisfied themselves that they checked out every such man and there was nothing to implicate any of them.
3) They concluded that he must live with people.
4) They concluded that he must be a Polish Jew, otherwise he would have been shopped by those people.

It seems to me that the house to house search did not uncover any particular individual.

The identification

1) Anderson does not state why this man was taken in for identification.
2) The identification proved their conclusions to be correct as the man identified was a Polish Jew.
3) Anderson does not think of this man as a mere suspect. In the eyes of Anderson, he is Jack the Ripper. Given the powers of the French police, he would have been brought to justice.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.