Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Abby Normal 13 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Trevor Marriott 21 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Abby Normal 33 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Abby Normal 37 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Trevor Marriott 50 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Paddy 59 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - (26 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - (22 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (22 posts)
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - (14 posts)
Witnesses: Mizen's inquest statement reconstructed - (3 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (2 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Police Officials and Procedures > Swanson, Chief Inspector Donald

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:19 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,184
Default

Hello Adam,

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamNeilWood View Post
Phil,

Many thanks for your considered response to the article and kind words.
You are most welcome and thank you for your kind description of my posting. . Again, well done to you both.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamNeilWood View Post
In answer to your question as to why the 'new' handwriting samples weren't posted here when the finger pointing was at it's worse, they simply hadn't been discovered by Nevill Swanson at that time, only after I'd made my announcement that the article was going to published and work was well under way.
Forgive me Adam, but I may be totally at sea here. I am of the impression that other handwriting examples of Swanson were known of, and seen by certain Ripperologists, in both other books and other examples in the same, main book, a long time ago. That is the impression I have been given earlier on this website. Without quoting directly, some examples of books with Swanson marginalia and annotatiions are already in private Ripperological hands are they not? My aplogies if this impression is incorrect.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamNeilWood View Post
Also, the point of the article was to collate all the known information and evidence and to add to it with new research. If I'd have posted a photo of a page of the address book or a letter, or the News of the World memo, debate would have continued here and the evidence would have become fragmented .
This I appreciate totally.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamNeilWood View Post
Now, there's a 55-page article in which all the information you could want on the Swanson Marginalia is preserved in one place for posterity and easy access.
Yes, and with the "fading" of the pencilled notes, it is most important too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamNeilWood View Post
The Swanson family were incredibly open and helpful during our researches, at a time when accusations thrown their way could have resulted in them pulling down the shutters, and who would have blamed them.
Well, as much as I TOTALLY respect a private person's posessions, and the right to keep/show/hide away/ destroy etc whatever he or she wants, if one goes back through the physical history of where the book itself was at any one point, limiting access to the book by presenting it to a museum with extremely limited access, cutting out many interested parties, was in my opinion a wrong move. This has now been rectified and the current decision made by Mr. N. Swanson that the book would be in better hands of a historian/collector after this excellent presentation through Ripperologist rather than a museum is entirely logical and correct, imho.

Thank you for your considered and fair respeonse.

best wishes

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:28 PM
AdamNeilWood AdamNeilWood is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
Forgive me Adam, but I may be totally at sea here. I am of the impression that other handwriting examples of Swanson were known of, and seen by certain Ripperologists, in both other books and other examples in the same, main book, a long time ago. That is the impression I have been given earlier on this website. Without quoting directly, some examples of books with Swanson marginalia and annotatiions are already in private Ripperological hands are they not? My aplogies if this impression is incorrect.

Well, as much as I TOTALLY respect a private person's posessions, and the right to keep/show/hide away/ destroy etc whatever he or she wants, if one goes back through the physical history of where the book itself was at any one point, limiting access to the book by presenting it to a museum with extremely limited access, cutting out many interested parties, was in my opinion a wrong move. This has now been rectified and the current decision made by Mr. N. Swanson that the book would be in better hands of a historian/collector after this excellent presentation through Ripperologist rather than a museum is entirely logical and correct, imho.
Hi Phil,

The handwriting samples which were already known were Swanson's annotations in other books in his library and his police notebooks. The new discoveries by Nevill were the address book and letters from DSS his grandson, including one in which he writes of his hand shaking 'paralytically'. Apologies for any confusion.

Regarding access to private materials, I wasn't referring so much to the the Marginalia itself but other family documents such as the address book, letters, Jim Swanson correspondence file etc. Without sight of these we wouldn't have been able to conduct a fraction of the research we did.

Best wishes
Adam
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:29 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty View Post
Nor should you.

Blame the individual who made scurrilous remarks and those who were so quick to support them.

Monty
I will not cast blame upon anyone. You do it if you feel it necessesary.

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:30 PM
Monty Monty is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 5,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
I will not cast blame upon anyone. You do it if you feel it necessesary.

Phil
Heh, I bet you wont.

Tad too late to take that stance Phil.

Monty
__________________




Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:38 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamNeilWood View Post
Hi Phil,

The handwriting samples which were already known were Swanson's annotations in other books in his library and his police notebooks. The new discoveries by Nevill were the address book and letters from DSS his grandson, including one in which he writes of his hand shaking 'paralytically'. Apologies for any confusion.

Regarding access to private materials, I wasn't referring so much to the the Marginalia itself but other family documents such as the address book, letters, Jim Swanson correspondence file etc. Without sight of these we wouldn't have been able to conduct a fraction of the research we did.

Best wishes
Adam
Hello Adam,

Thank you again for the kind and swift response.

No apology needed. My reference was indeed to the library kept books, amongst others. I would have thought that if there were a greater known examples of the man's handwriting that could have been presented long ago, then the furore may well have been avoided. As regards the examples already in Ripperolological posession, if my poor memory recalls correctly, these too could have added to and settled the problem, no?

The revealing of the shaking problem helps this an awful lot. May I ask a slightly cheeky question? As Mr N Swanson has only recently discovered the letters etc, are we now certain that the Swanson family has gone through all of the Donald Swanson material? Mr. N. Swanson's recent discovery indicates to me at least that his father my not have made such an exhaustive look through the family posessions as he himself has done. No suggestion of rudeness intended, but can we expect more finds?

The research and article was indeed heavily reliant on the material you quote.
So when asking my respectfully innocent but slightly cheeky question above, I have in mind any follow-up research and article you may present.

best wishes

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....

Last edited by Phil Carter : 10-12-2012 at 12:45 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:39 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monty View Post
Heh, I bet you wont.

Tad too late to take that stance Phil.

Monty
Would you kindly expand and explain this comment, which I find personally suggestive and pointed. Kindly explain in full. Thank you.

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:51 PM
AdamNeilWood AdamNeilWood is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
May I ask a slightly cheeky question? As Mr N Swanson has only recently discovered the letters etc, are we now certain that the Swanson family has gone through all of the Donald Swanson material? Mr. N. Swanson's recent discovery indicates to me at least that his father my not have made such an exhaustive look through the family posessions as he himself has done. No suggestion of rudeness intended, but can we expect more finds?
Hi Phil,

The reason these letters were only recently discovered by Nevill is that they were sent to DSS's grandson Donald Nevill, brother of Jim, and as such were in the possession of that side of the family.

They only arrived with Nevill when he recently began collating materials from all sides of the family to add to the Swanson Collection which will be offered for sale.

There is, therefore, a chance that further letters from DSS or materials belonging to him will be discovered by Nevill as he continues to build the Collection. But equally there might not be!

Best wishes
Adam
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-12-2012, 12:54 PM
Phil Carter Phil Carter is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,184
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamNeilWood View Post
Hi Phil,

The reason these letters were only recently discovered by Nevill is that they were sent to DSS's grandson Donald Nevill, brother of Jim, and as such were in the possession of that side of the family.

They only arrived with Nevill when he recently began collating materials from all sides of the family to add to the Swanson Collection which will be offered for sale.

There is, therefore, a chance that further letters from DSS or materials belonging to him will be discovered by Nevill as he continues to build the Collection. But equally there might not be!

Best wishes
Adam
Hello Adam,

Thank you once again for the swift and fine response.

In that case, may I ask you to pass on, and take the opportunity to wish Mr. Nevill Swanson well with what he manages to accrue, in the hope that perhaps, just perhaps, a tiny golden Ripperological nugget appears.

Many thanks

Phil
__________________
Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


Justice for the 96 = achieved
Accountability? ....

Last edited by Phil Carter : 10-12-2012 at 12:56 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-12-2012, 01:06 PM
Monty Monty is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 5,191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil Carter View Post
Would you kindly expand and explain this comment, which I find personally suggestive and pointed. Kindly explain in full. Thank you.

Phil
It really doesnt need expanding Phil.

You know what happened, you know you accusations and you know your part.

I shall expect an PM from Admin in due course.

Monty
__________________




Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-12-2012, 02:00 PM
Tom_Wescott Tom_Wescott is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,676
Default

The past is the past, but I'll say again that from this point forward, all room for debate about the provenance and legitimacy of the marginalia has been removed, because of this article. Anyone suggesting from this point forward that Swanson did not write every word of it, assuming they have read this article, can only be seen as working from a personal agenda, but I would assume this won't be an issue again.

Of course, there's still plenty of room for debate as to whether Swanson personally suspected Kosminski. It seems to me he was more of a type b personality, falling in line with Anderson, who was unquestionably a type a personality.

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.