Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: So if you live in Bethnal Green, you won´t kill in Whitechapel? - by Fisherman 23 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - by Simon Wood 3 hours ago.
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - by Wickerman 6 hours ago.
Witnesses: 36 Berner Street............... - by MrBarnett 6 hours ago.
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - by packers stem 7 hours ago.
Non-Fiction: "Ripperland" by Andrew Firth - by Herlock Sholmes 9 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Witnesses: 36 Berner Street............... - (21 posts)
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - (5 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Why Didn't the Police Have Schwartz and/or Lawende Take a Look at Hutchinson? - (4 posts)
Non-Fiction: "Ripperland" by Andrew Firth - (4 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (2 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Did Mary Kelly meet the Bethnal Green Botherer? - (2 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Motive, Method and Madness

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-11-2015, 04:42 PM
Wickerman Wickerman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
... How often did Mary solicit, with almost 3 weeks in rent arrears and a fear of the streets that Fall?

Its easy to speculate those three were soliciting, far harder to provide any proof of that.
Hi Michael.

Barnett told Abberline directly in his police statement when they sat together sometime on the 9th, that Mary had already resorted to prostitution before he left on the 30th.

"...in consequence of not earning sufficient money to give her, and her resorting to prostitution, I resolved on leaving her..."
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-11-2015, 04:59 PM
DJA DJA is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Some Australian Mountain Range.
Posts: 1,720
Default

Yet three days later,Barnett testified there was only one reason for leaving.
__________________
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-11-2015, 05:48 PM
Wickerman Wickerman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,886
Default

Inquest records are not to be taken as all inclusive.
__________________
Regards, Jon S.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-11-2015, 07:52 PM
DJA DJA is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Some Australian Mountain Range.
Posts: 1,720
Default

Do you think Barnett was telling the truth?
__________________
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-11-2015, 08:46 PM
c.d. c.d. is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,680
Default

There is an old joke that goes like this -- A man is talking to a woman in a bar and asks her if she would sleep with a man for a million dollars. She replies for a million of course. He then asks her if she would sleep with him for ten dollars. She is offended and says of course not what do you take me for? He replies we have already established that now we are just arguing about the price.

The point being that if it can be established with reasonable certainty that the victims all engaged in prostitution at one time or another it is not unreasonable to believe that even though they were not actively soliciting or had no intention of soliciting before they ventured out on the night they were killed that they might be tempted by an offer that came their way particularly if it was a generous offer or at least more than the going rate. Such an offer would be easy to make for a killer who knew he could get his money back.

c.d.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-11-2015, 09:57 PM
Barnaby Barnaby is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 677
Default

With respect to Eddowes, I doubt very much that she had knowledge of the murderer and arranged a meeting with him. How would she have acquired this knowledge? She had just returned to London afterall.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-11-2015, 10:14 PM
DJA DJA is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Some Australian Mountain Range.
Posts: 1,720
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnaby View Post
With respect to Eddowes, I doubt very much that she had knowledge of the murderer and arranged a meeting with him. How would she have acquired this knowledge? She had just returned to London afterall.
She returned to London to collect a reward.

Has it dawned on you that the CV5 knew each other?
__________________
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 11-12-2015, 01:47 AM
curious4 curious4 is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,748
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
I have no problem with the above thinking curious. Although, I would say that for me, its likely she did get hammered, that the objective of her drinking partners was to get her into that state so she wouldn't be hesitant about talking to them about her supposed claim on the reward, and I think that what they learned from her had something to do with her being murdered. I also think its possible that the hand on sailor mans chest might have been her being thankful that sailor man waited for her, perhaps a meeting may have been set for 1am.

If you think the above is possible, then you might also agree with me that because of the very short time elapsed between the sighting and her discovery, sailor man might have led her to someone already waiting in the square.

Cheers
Hello Michael

Yes I think that is a distinct possibility. She obviously trusted him completely. Not sure she would have got drunk and talked about it, there was the risk that someone would beat her to the reward.

Best wishes
C4
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 11-12-2015, 03:13 AM
packers stem packers stem is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJA View Post
Do you think Barnett was telling the truth?
No
Not even with the ID...
__________________
You can lead a horse to water.....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 11-12-2015, 03:21 AM
packers stem packers stem is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,056
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael W Richards View Post
Hi Curious,

We are told that Kate and John slept together almost every night, yet when she exits the police station, she goes in the opposite direction of where he would likely be. I believe John did in fact secure a bed for that night, so, had Kate gone looking for him she wouldn't have to walk the streets. The City's policy of holding D & D's until they were sober, unlike the Met who held them all night, did contribute to street traffic...but with Kate there are stories about her that make us question why she went to Mitre Square, and what happened those last 24 hours.
Some questions are;

1.The pawn ticket was for Friday, not Saturday as John said. They had money Friday night...so why did Kate supposedly go to a casual ward? And why, by the storyline, was she released without having to do any labor for her bed...as was the rule at casual wards.
2. Kate told a friend she intended to collect reward money for giving police the name of the killer at large...if so, was she blackmailing that party for an even greater reward?
3. She had no money that we are aware of on Saturday afternoon, yet she gets stupid drunk on someones money by 8pm. Who paid, and why?
4. Early on the police themselves speculated she had an "arranged meeting'? What prompted them to make that statement"?

Its far to easy, and without any evidence, saying that Kate was probably soliciting. Since she had been hopping for weeks, and since we have evidence that she and John were together every night by the landlord...just how often was she soliciting at that place in time? If at all.

How often was Liz Stride soliciting, when she said herself that she had been working for a few months "among the Jews"? How often did Mary solicit, with almost 3 weeks in rent arrears and a fear of the streets that Fall?

Its easy to speculate those three were soliciting, far harder to provide any proof of that.
Excellent post
And it should never be forgotten that Kate was going by the name 'mary kelly' that day...
So whoever got her drunk believed her to be Mary Kelly
And whoever got her drunk almost certainly met her and killed her believing she was in fact...Mary Kelly
__________________
You can lead a horse to water.....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.