Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by harry 40 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by Abby Normal 45 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by Abby Normal 49 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by harry 57 minutes ago.
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by Observer 2 hours ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - by AuroraSarintacos 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - (23 posts)
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - (18 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (13 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - (7 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (6 posts)
Witnesses: Mizen's inquest statement reconstructed - (6 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Letters and Communications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-15-2015, 09:16 AM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
*
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Even though this letter is not part of my theory.
I understand that you now want to say that the letter is not part your theory, you don't need to keep repeating it. But a letter to the press from the killer is the only form of 'data' that you have mentioned on this forum so it's really all I can ask you about. I'm just trying to work out what this letter is supposed to say because your posts are less than clear on the subject.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-16-2015, 08:05 AM
MysterySinger MysterySinger is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 422
Default

With regard to the thought that Elizabeth Prater was supposed to be another victim on the same night as MJK I just have a few comments. In order to arrive at that there have to be a number of assumptions (versus evidence). It has to be more than the co-incidence of names of Queens (Mary and Elizabeth).

Mrs Prater did indeed live at number 20 and it was on the first floor - presumably covering a larger area than simply above Kelly's room because she could make out whether or not there was a light on in the Lodging House (across the road at the front?).

She said that she had been waiting for some time outside for a man who lived with her (but didn't show up). If a man lived with her, how could JTR know that he wouldn't have been there on that night?

Mrs Prater went to bed having put 2 tables behind the door. We do not know which door. The entrance to the stairs to her room was first on the right down the court as I understand it. Did she put 2 tables there or was it possible to lock that door once entered?

Would there then have been another door to her room at the top of the stairs - and that one had the two table placed against it? I've assumed that that was the scenario. So JTR would have had to try 2 points of entry to get to Mrs Prater.

How did JTR know the names of either MJK or EP? Is there evidence that he did - and was he actually known to all the victims?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-16-2015, 01:42 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MysterySinger View Post
With regard to the thought that Elizabeth Prater was supposed to be another victim on the same night as MJK I just have a few comments. In order to arrive at that there have to be a number of assumptions (versus evidence). It has to be more than the co-incidence of names of Queens (Mary and Elizabeth).

Mrs Prater did indeed live at number 20 and it was on the first floor - presumably covering a larger area than simply above Kelly's room because she could make out whether or not there was a light on in the Lodging House (across the road at the front?).

She said that she had been waiting for some time outside for a man who lived with her (but didn't show up). If a man lived with her, how could JTR know that he wouldn't have been there on that night?

Mrs Prater went to bed having put 2 tables behind the door. We do not know which door. The entrance to the stairs to her room was first on the right down the court as I understand it. Did she put 2 tables there or was it possible to lock that door once entered?

Would there then have been another door to her room at the top of the stairs - and that one had the two table placed against it? I've assumed that that was the scenario. So JTR would have had to try 2 points of entry to get to Mrs Prater.

How did JTR know the names of either MJK or EP? Is there evidence that he did - and was he actually known to all the victims?
Hi,

and thanks for good questions.

When I answer historical questions I try to put away my own knowledge and try different hypotheses. Letīs try this on your first question:

She (Prater) said that she had been waiting for some time outside for a man who lived with her (but didn't show up). If a man lived with her, how could JTR know that he wouldn't have been there on that night?

Hypotheses for this:

1. Prater was scared after the murder of Kelly and wanted everybody to believe she had a man there to protect her if the murder would aim at her or come back.

2. Prater was actually waiting for a client but didnīt want to say that.

3. The man didnīt show up so he wasnīt interested in her (anymore).

4. The source isnīt reliable.

Perhaps you can come to think of more hypotheses.

About the barricading of the door: if there had been any other serious obstacles on the way to her room she wouldnīt have needed to barricade the door.

Regards Pierre

Last edited by Pierre : 11-16-2015 at 01:50 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-16-2015, 02:53 PM
Bridewell Bridewell is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bottesford, Leicestershire
Posts: 3,714
Default

Quote:
As you already know I believe that Jack the Ripper planned the murder of Mary Kelly to spoil Lord Mayor's Day.
Pierre, we know a great deal about what you believe but very little about why you believe it - which makes sensible discussion all but impossible. The Kelly murder did not disrupt the Lord Mayor's Show, nor was it likely to. There are many much more effective ways of ruining a parade without resorting to the dismembering of a prostitute. Do you actually have any evidence in support of the suspect you refuse to name, or is it just speculation about purported oblique references in written correspondence? If the latter can I suggest you read all the rubbish posted about Vincent Van Gogh and Toulouse Lautrec, both of whose names were punted on this forum as suspects only to disappear without trace?
__________________
Regards, Bridewell.

Last edited by Bridewell : 11-16-2015 at 02:56 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-17-2015, 03:17 AM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bridewell View Post
Do you actually have any evidence in support of the suspect you refuse to name, or is it just speculation about purported oblique references in written correspondence?
Hi Bridewell,

and thanks for your question. I will try to answer your question as clearly as possible.

The evidence in support of the suspect consist of 3 data sources which I define as weak, 6 data sources defined as medium strong, and 6 data sources defined as strong. 4 of these strong ones 6 contains his name, 1 of the weak ones does so too.

I have also found a handwriting match lately but this one I consider weak at the moment since we are not sure about the provenience of the source which I compare his handwriting with.

I understand that this probably means nothing to you. So I will try to describe the contents a bit.

They contain:

A confession
A strong motive for the murders
A strong motive for taunting the police
A strong motive for spoiling Lord Mayorīs Day*
A personal motive for the choice of the 9th November*

*(these assumptions are not drawn from the metaphorical source I have discussed with you.)

An explanation to the mutilations
An explanation to the Goulston Street Graffito
An explanation to Monroīs thinking
An explanation to why he stopped after McKenzie

Indications that he was also the Torso killer

I donīt think we should over estimate the case. He was just a serial killer. And since he was interested in getting his message through to the police, he left clues.

Regards Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-17-2015, 03:28 AM
DJA DJA is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Some Australian Mountain Range.
Posts: 1,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
provenience of the source which I compare his handwriting with.

I understand that this probably means nothing to you.
Canadian who crossed into USA the other month.

Quite FRANKly,if he posted under his original handle Ally would have a match on his ISP.
__________________
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-17-2015, 10:55 AM
David Orsam David Orsam is offline
*
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
A confession
Right, so you have a confession from your (long dead) suspect yet you don't want to name him in case he is innocent.

How does that make any sense?

Or do you harbour doubts as to the authenticity of the confession?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-17-2015, 11:35 AM
MysterySinger MysterySinger is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 422
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Hi Bridewell,

and thanks for your question. I will try to answer your question as clearly as possible.

The evidence in support of the suspect consist of 3 data sources which I define as weak, 6 data sources defined as medium strong, and 6 data sources defined as strong. 4 of these strong ones 6 contains his name, 1 of the weak ones does so too.

I have also found a handwriting match lately but this one I consider weak at the moment since we are not sure about the provenience of the source which I compare his handwriting with.

I understand that this probably means nothing to you. So I will try to describe the contents a bit.

They contain:

A confession
A strong motive for the murders
A strong motive for taunting the police
A strong motive for spoiling Lord Mayorīs Day*
A personal motive for the choice of the 9th November*

*(these assumptions are not drawn from the metaphorical source I have discussed with you.)

An explanation to the mutilations
An explanation to the Goulston Street Graffito
An explanation to Monroīs thinking
An explanation to why he stopped after McKenzie

Indications that he was also the Torso killer

I donīt think we should over estimate the case. He was just a serial killer. And since he was interested in getting his message through to the police, he left clues.

Regards Pierre
So the confession, motive for the murders and motive for taunting the Police are metaphorical.

What I don't fully understand is "he was just a serial killer" because you have intimated that the revelation of his name would be kind of sensational and if that's all he was why would you rather it not be the person you think?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-17-2015, 01:13 PM
Premium Member
SirJohnFalstaff SirJohnFalstaff is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Abzurdistan or Canada, depends
Posts: 565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
David - you are missing the important information here.

And please reconsider your own hypothesis of a killer writing the actual adress of his next crime to the police.

Iīll get back to you when you have given that some thought.

Regards Pierre
a little bit condescending, isn't it?
__________________
Is it progress when a cannibal uses a fork?
- Stanislaw Jerzy Lee
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-17-2015, 01:50 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MysterySinger View Post
So the confession, motive for the murders and motive for taunting the Police are metaphorical.

No. There are plain simple realistic sources for these assumptions.

What I don't fully understand is "he was just a serial killer" because you have intimated that the revelation of his name would be kind of sensational and if that's all he was why would you rather it not be the person you think?

I mean that the reason people havenīt found him is that he hides behind a lot of mythological tales. But if we get rid of that, he is just a serial killer.
Regards Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.