Tweet
Hello all ,
Here is a slightly different take on my last thread . In both threads i start with the murder and work my way back . i am still very much of the opinion that whoever mutilated these poor women did so with some degree of anatomical knowledge as well as some basic knowledge of Freemasonry , in particular the ( four stages of cruelty , paintings by William Hogarth ) which depict a ritualistic Freemason killing ! The similarity is too great to be coincidence in my mind . Especially as the final victim (Mary Kelly in Millers court) bares a striking resemblance to the fourth painting in the series ( William Hogarth the reward of cruelty ) .. Mary Kelly may well have also been the fourth in a series ! ( i am going on the assumption that Tabram was a warm up and Stride was killed by someone else ) However this does not mean the killer or killers were Freemasons , or even a Doctor for that matter ... i am just playing around with a few ideas , and hopefully i'll get a few questions answered along the way .
Ok , so Non Freemason James Monroe is forced out of his job by Leading Freemason Charles Warren , And within 24 hours of his replacement ( Robert Anderson ) taking over , Polly Nichols is found butchered in Bucks Row .. And for nine weeks a dark shadow falls over the East End of London .. Until Charles Warren resigns his position , coincidentally on the 9th Nov , the very morning that the last Victim ( Mary Kelly ) is discovered butchered in her room at 13 Millers court .. All of a sudden the murders stop !
Is it possible that someone was not too happy that a good man was forced out of his job in order to accommodate Anderson ? ( maybe even assuming that Anderson was a Freemason also ) Further more is it then also plausible that such a disgruntled individual or group of individuals would want to point an accusatory finger at the very people they feel the are beyond repercussion .. maybe this kind of thing has been occurring far to often in the life of certain individuals who feel they are being overlooked or outranked for a well deserved promotion in order to accommodate the ( good pal's ) act. Monro was very popular with all he worked with , And there were many unhappy at his forced resignation, Maybe this was the straw that broke the camel's back ...
So what better way for Monro supporters to seek revenge on those who muscle and elbow their way to the top of the pecking order ( albeit helped up on the orders of others ) than giving them a string of gruesome murders they will never be able to solve ... And even better than that , What if certain false Clues were deliberately left laying about pertaining to the Freemasons , the very Brotherhood that Warren was involved with , Clues that Warren would fully understand but be bound and gagged and unable to mention due to his own Freemason status .. How frustrating would that be for the Commissioner and his new Assistant ?
Enough already moonbegger
Here is a slightly different take on my last thread . In both threads i start with the murder and work my way back . i am still very much of the opinion that whoever mutilated these poor women did so with some degree of anatomical knowledge as well as some basic knowledge of Freemasonry , in particular the ( four stages of cruelty , paintings by William Hogarth ) which depict a ritualistic Freemason killing ! The similarity is too great to be coincidence in my mind . Especially as the final victim (Mary Kelly in Millers court) bares a striking resemblance to the fourth painting in the series ( William Hogarth the reward of cruelty ) .. Mary Kelly may well have also been the fourth in a series ! ( i am going on the assumption that Tabram was a warm up and Stride was killed by someone else ) However this does not mean the killer or killers were Freemasons , or even a Doctor for that matter ... i am just playing around with a few ideas , and hopefully i'll get a few questions answered along the way .
Ok , so Non Freemason James Monroe is forced out of his job by Leading Freemason Charles Warren , And within 24 hours of his replacement ( Robert Anderson ) taking over , Polly Nichols is found butchered in Bucks Row .. And for nine weeks a dark shadow falls over the East End of London .. Until Charles Warren resigns his position , coincidentally on the 9th Nov , the very morning that the last Victim ( Mary Kelly ) is discovered butchered in her room at 13 Millers court .. All of a sudden the murders stop !
Is it possible that someone was not too happy that a good man was forced out of his job in order to accommodate Anderson ? ( maybe even assuming that Anderson was a Freemason also ) Further more is it then also plausible that such a disgruntled individual or group of individuals would want to point an accusatory finger at the very people they feel the are beyond repercussion .. maybe this kind of thing has been occurring far to often in the life of certain individuals who feel they are being overlooked or outranked for a well deserved promotion in order to accommodate the ( good pal's ) act. Monro was very popular with all he worked with , And there were many unhappy at his forced resignation, Maybe this was the straw that broke the camel's back ...
So what better way for Monro supporters to seek revenge on those who muscle and elbow their way to the top of the pecking order ( albeit helped up on the orders of others ) than giving them a string of gruesome murders they will never be able to solve ... And even better than that , What if certain false Clues were deliberately left laying about pertaining to the Freemasons , the very Brotherhood that Warren was involved with , Clues that Warren would fully understand but be bound and gagged and unable to mention due to his own Freemason status .. How frustrating would that be for the Commissioner and his new Assistant ?
Enough already moonbegger
Comment