Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - by Wickerman 31 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - by Sam Flynn 47 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - by Wickerman 1 hour and 13 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Did Mary Kelly meet the Bethnal Green Botherer? - by Wickerman 2 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: So if you live in Bethnal Green, you won´t kill in Whitechapel? - by caz 3 hours ago.
Non-Fiction: Jack and the Thames Torso Murders: A New Ripper? - by Abby Normal 3 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Witnesses: Kennedy and Lewis - (9 posts)
Witnesses: 36 Berner Street............... - (3 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Did Mary Kelly meet the Bethnal Green Botherer? - (2 posts)
Non-Fiction: Jack and the Thames Torso Murders: A New Ripper? - (1 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: So if you live in Bethnal Green, you won´t kill in Whitechapel? - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Lechmere/Cross, Charles

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-05-2016, 01:46 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default Lechmere was Jack the Ripper

Hi Fisherman,

I have read all your posts on this forum and I now understand that you are right. Charles Lechmere was Jack the Ripper.

It is easy to see that you are right.

1. Lechmere was found with a victim.
2. Lechmere lied about his name.
3. Lechmere lied about having seen at policeman at the murder site.

Simple: Lechmere was Jack the Ripper.

And the motive was that his mother was domineering, since she married more than once.

And therefore Lechmere was a psychopath.

And the trigger was Lechmere moving away from his mother.

And he killed on his way to work.

And Mary Kelly was killed by Lechmere on his way to work and also, all the torso killings was done by Lechmere.

Thank you.

Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2016, 11:23 AM
MysterySinger MysterySinger is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 422
Default

And it's been on telly so that proves it.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2016, 12:04 PM
Geddy2112 Geddy2112 is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 187
Default

Was the sarcasm font on the OP or not I could not tell...
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2016, 12:13 PM
Fisherman Fisherman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 18,551
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MysterySinger View Post
And it's been on telly so that proves it.
Bless you, yes indeed!
The one snag is that Kos, Dru, Tumblety et al have ALSO been on telly, so there an awfully large bunch of Rippers proven...
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2016, 12:17 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherman View Post
Bless you, yes indeed!
The one snag is that Kos, Dru, Tumblety et al have ALSO been on telly, so there an awfully large bunch of Rippers proven...
Aha! But they were not found WITH the body!!!
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2016, 12:18 PM
Henry Flower Henry Flower is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hackney Wick
Posts: 1,132
Default

What a shame; I was really enjoying seeing the zero replies there, but somebody had to go and spoil it.

Pierre, given that you are a famous historian who has solved this case, given that you know who did it, and how it was covered up, why are you so obsessed with Fisherman and his Lechmere work? It should be absolutely irrelevant to you, and yet you seem strangely, bitterly obsessed. Wouldn't your time be better spent hunting down that final smidgeon of evidence for which you've spent over a year unsuccessfully scouring "the archives"?

At least Fisherman has the integrity to put his cards on the table, unlike you, you hypocrite.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-06-2016, 12:22 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Flower View Post
What a shame; I was really enjoying seeing the zero replies there, but somebody had to go and spoil it.

Pierre, given that you are a famous historian who has solved this case, given that you know who did it, and how it was covered up, why are you so obsessed with Fisherman and his Lechmere work? It should be absolutely irrelevant to you, and yet you seem strangely, bitterly obsessed. Wouldn't your time be better spent hunting down that final smidgeon of evidence for which you've spent over a year unsuccessfully scouring "the archives"?

At least Fisherman has the integrity to put his cards on the table, unlike you, you hypocrite.
Dear Henry,

You very often use an unpolite and belittling language. It blurrs the contents of your texts if there are any such.

In this post we see words like "obsessed", "bitterly" and "hypocrite". The meaning of the post is lost due to this type of language.

Regards, Pierre
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-06-2016, 12:44 PM
Henry Flower Henry Flower is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hackney Wick
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Dear Henry,

You very often use an unpolite and belittling language. It blurrs the contents of your texts if there are any such.

In this post we see words like "obsessed", "bitterly" and "hypocrite". The meaning of the post is lost due to this type of language.

Regards, Pierre
Pierre, no it isn't, you are a liar as usual.

Maybe if I typed the whole post in bold font you'd get the point.

Any excuse to avoid a question, as usual. You are pathetic.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-06-2016, 01:09 PM
Pierre Pierre is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 4,407
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Flower View Post
Pierre, no it isn't, you are a liar as usual.

Maybe if I typed the whole post in bold font you'd get the point.

Any excuse to avoid a question, as usual. You are pathetic.
Who do you think was Jack the Ripper?
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-06-2016, 02:46 PM
Henry Flower Henry Flower is offline
Inactive
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Hackney Wick
Posts: 1,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre View Post
Who do you think was Jack the Ripper?
I do not think that there is now or ever will be sufficient data to answer that question. But the question is not of vital importance to me, and anyway what I "think" is of no importance; I come to this site partly to study the history of the area in which I spend a lot of my time, I come here to learn, but I also do enjoy engaging with some of the more fantastical and deluded theorists. The people who decide on a suspect and then begin retro-fitting their "research" and their "data" - an approach that would doubtless lead to someone announcing their interest in the case by claiming to have "found him".

Human vanity and delusions always fascinate me. I find you amusing because of your clumsily immature expressions of vanity, your declarations of ethical and methodological purity, and your transparent hypocrisy: talking down to others for a year, telling them they won't understand your exalted methods, and downright mocking them with sarcasm as you have done with Fisherman here, are all OK in your book, but for me to call you a hypocritical coward and an ass, well, that is just different isn't it? That's unacceptable!

No Pierre, it isn't. You are equally nasty but in a passive-aggressive way. You veil your nastiness just as you veil your suspect.

I do not believe the Whitechapel murderer will ever be definitively identified, and it matters not a jot to me whether he is or not, whether he was one man or a set of coincidences. I come here to learn about a place and an era I love, to satisfy a craving to study the most outlying extremities of human depravity, and to engage with some who are thoughtful, educated and insightful, and others who are conceited, deluded, hypocritical and dishonest.

I find it all tremendously rewarding, and I can't wait to amuse myself with your theory when you have notified all the relatives and finally set your terrified suspect before the hungry pack.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.