Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by caz 40 minutes ago.
Motive, Method and Madness: Was the ripper and also the torsomans crimes totally non sexual in nature? - by Abby Normal 44 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: torso maps - by Abby Normal 50 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: torso maps - by Abby Normal 1 hour and 4 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Abby Normal 1 hour and 7 minutes ago.
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - by Alfie 1 hour and 16 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (17 posts)
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: Lechmere was Jack the Ripper - (14 posts)
Motive, Method and Madness: Was the ripper and also the torsomans crimes totally non sexual in nature? - (13 posts)
Torso Killings: torso maps - (10 posts)
General Suspect Discussion: Sergeant Thick's Sketchy Connections? - (6 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Sickert, Walter

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-15-2008, 08:26 PM
Jeff Leahy Jeff Leahy is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East end-kent
Posts: 3,737
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by perrymason View Post
Hi Jeff,

Well by my count she has so far only provided insufficient proof that a Ripper letter or two may have been penned by Sickert.
Am I the only person that finds this rather significant...acording to Professor Bowers findings Sickert was possibly the authour of some of the Hoax letters...let me remind you that the sender of the Hoax Yorkshire ripper calls is still in jail..

Quote:
Originally Posted by perrymason View Post
The fact she invested her money into the study since publishing is a result of the addictive aspects of researching these cases, not her altruistic desire to see real progress made in the field.

I give her credit for her apparent commitment to actually researching further, but "Case Closed" it isnt.

Best regards.
What do you know of Patricia Cornwalls altruistic desires...this comment is twaddle...

'Case Closed' it is not..

as I stated ..it is unfortunate that this phraze was put on her book cover...she has publically stated she wish it was NOT...

I completely understand the pressures authors and Directors are put apon by publishers and broadcasters....Thats the realities of the business..get over it..grow up..

I understand that this phraze will not appear on the updated book..lets hope so...

Now can we all stop this nasty unjustified Bullying..and leave Patricia Cornwall to get on with her work in peace.

Yo Patricia some of casebook loves you..
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:28 PM
Stewart P Evans Stewart P Evans is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,994
Default Patricia Cornwell and Jack the Ripper

Patricia Cornwell (2002) - " I became interested in Jack the Ripper very accidentally. I was asked if I wanted to go to Scotland Yard, and I'd never been to Scotland Yard and one of my methods in my books is I always try to cover a branch of law enforcement that I have never exposed myself to. And Scotland Yard was one of those so went over and I met John Grieve and I was told that by the way he's a Ripper expert. And so he offered to take me on a retrospective visit of the crime scenes."

John Grieve (2002) - "People have talked about Walter Sickert since almost the time of the murders to such an extent that the catalogue of a recent exhibition about him saw it necessary to dismiss the suggestion that he was Jack the Ripper. But in considerable detail which is not something you normally find in an exhibition catalogue."
__________________
SPE

Treat me gently I'm a newbie.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:53 PM
Jeff Leahy Jeff Leahy is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East end-kent
Posts: 3,737
Default

Hello Stewart

I hope your speech goes well on Saturday, unfortunately I'm doing a motion Graphics course and will be unable to attend.

While what Machael says about you, AP and Martin is correct, there are also brilliant JtR minds that avoid casebook because of petty infighting and unjustified name calling (like: CornBall) that sometimes goes on..

If you will excuse the name dropping..I finally met your freind Don Rumblow on Tuesday (one of my all time Bally hero's) I was saddened by his comments at being unwilling to post on casebook because of precisely such things. That is a loss to us all...a bit less attack, more humility and generosity would do us all good..

Dan Norders comments seemed to me directed at Keith Skinner who we all know is one of the Greatest JtR researchers and currently working for Patricia.

Perhaps Dan Norder would like to make a public appology for his yes man statement?

Yours Jeff Leahy
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 05-16-2008, 12:19 AM
BillyE BillyE is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 171
Default

I believe the post I'm writing could be put up under any category on the Casebook forum. There is indeed to many posts that are more along the lines of undercutting someone's sensibilities, rather than curtiously debating the various aspects of the case. This seems to be particularly true when it comes to the suspects, but it permiates the entire message board.

Patricia Cornwell has sold enough books to demonstrate she has talent in writing crime fiction, and isn't the first writer of fiction to turn attention to true crime. While although I totally disagree with her conclusions, and her assertion that the case is closed, and indeed even her bruised ego, and lashing out when her conclusions are questioned, she is entitled to her conclusions. This isn't because she has the money to back-up her claims, but because her beliefs are just as valid as anyone elses, no more valid, but no less valid. My personal feelings are Ms. Cornwell may well have slandered the name of the good artist, but given his propensity to relish anything Ripper related he may have appriciated being listed as a suspect. So, who knows?!

Anytime you name a suspect, and list how and why you think said suspect did it you open yourself up to criticism. Stan Russo has named Sickert, and J. K. Stephen. He won't go into any further detail pending an upcoming book, but he should prepare himself for the barage of criticism that will come. Ripperologist great Martin Fido has backed off his "Nathan Kaminski" suspect name for the seemingly more palitable "David Cohen" because of pressure, I'm thinking, from his publisher. It just goes to show if you name a suspect you make yourself pretty vulnerable to the Ripper masses. I have absolutly no doubt if I were to make my opinions on the Ripper known I'd have to build an underground bunker to escape the backlash of the posters of this forum alone.

All this is just to say the following: sure, feel free to disagree. Debate vigerously, but with courtesy. Viciously attacking someone with a different opinion will only fuel the fire that so often threatens to burn this forum down. It only causes the person you've attacked to attack you in kind. Nothing good ever comes of this. But then again, what do I know?! :-D
__________________
"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Winston Churchill
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:35 AM
jmenges jmenges is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyE View Post
Ripperologist great Martin Fido has backed off his "Nathan Kaminski" suspect name for the seemingly more palitable "David Cohen" because of pressure, I'm thinking, from his publisher.
Incorrect. Fido cites Adam Wood as the one who told him that Kaminsky was a "bridge too many". It was Martin Fido's publisher who in fact encouraged him to research the asylum records for Kosminski himself rather than just suggest that the records be searched, as was his intention in the original book pitch. (see rippercast's show @ 5min). It was then that he found Kaminsky, prior to finding Kominski, and almost too late to get the later into the book. I believe Fido still believes Kaminsky a good candidate for 'Leather Apron'.

What has been included or excluded in the new A-Z on this topic I do not know, but I might be able to ask him, since we're (spoiler) trying for the Begg/Fido show this weekend.

JM
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-16-2008, 05:12 AM
BillyE BillyE is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 171
Default

I had listened to the Martin Fido episode of the Rippercast, as I never miss one. I had interpreted Dr. Fido's answer on the Kaminski issue as that he had to back away from Nathan Kaminski and back to the more accepted "David Cohen" name. Thank you for the correction. The core of my point remains the same. How unfortunate it is a person names a suspect only to be bombarded with negative hateful responses, rather than respectful discussion and debate on merit. I'm sure you'll agree with me on that. :-)
__________________
"Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning." Winston Churchill
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-16-2008, 07:24 AM
Stewart P Evans Stewart P Evans is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,994
Default Martin Fido and Kosminski

Martin Fido has been credited with historically identifying Aaron Kosminski as being Macnaghten's 'Kosminski' (and Anderson's Polish Jew) and finding the said Aaron in the asylum records in 1987 during his pioneering research.

Martin had just about 'put his manuscript to bed' when his publishing people gave him the opportunity to add extra material. Martin decided to use the documentation on Cohen and Kaminsky. Returning to the records Martin accessed the admissions and discharge book which went into 1891, and there he found Aaron Kosminski, together with an address, his brother's name, and his occupation. Which just goes to show that you can never take your research too far.
__________________
SPE

Treat me gently I'm a newbie.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-16-2008, 07:40 AM
Stewart P Evans Stewart P Evans is offline
Superintendent
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,994
Default Ripper Authors

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pirate Jack View Post
Hello Stewart
I hope your speech goes well on Saturday, unfortunately I'm doing a motion Graphics course and will be unable to attend.
While what Machael says about you, AP and Martin is correct, there are also brilliant JtR minds that avoid casebook because of petty infighting and unjustified name calling (like: CornBall) that sometimes goes on..
If you will excuse the name dropping..I finally met your freind Don Rumblow on Tuesday (one of my all time Bally hero's) I was saddened by his comments at being unwilling to post on casebook because of precisely such things. That is a loss to us all...a bit less attack, more humility and generosity would do us all good..

Yours Jeff Leahy
Thank you for that Jeff, yes I am well aware of Don's feelings regarding all things Ripper.

Unfortunately the in-fighting goes way, way back and pre dates the modern era. It is probably to be found in just about every area of historical research and writing where personal theories and opinions are so much to the fore. In fact it is very much a part of human nature. It reached an unprecedented level of acrimony when the 'diary' entered the public debate forum and the bitterness is still very much around today. In the Farson/Cullen days we had Farson accusing Cullen of stealing his Druitt material, an accusation that Cullen always strenuously denied.

All this would certainly make for a very revealing, and entertaining book on 'A History of Ripper Writers and Research' and you wouldn't believe some of the material that I hold in my files. But it is not, and perhaps shouldn't be, for publication.
__________________
SPE

Treat me gently I'm a newbie.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-16-2008, 10:02 AM
Monty Monty is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Leicestershire
Posts: 5,183
Default

Stewart,

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart P Evans View Post
Patricia Cornwell (2002) - " I became interested in Jack the Ripper very accidentally. I was asked if I wanted to go to Scotland Yard, and I'd never been to Scotland Yard and one of my methods in my books is I always try to cover a branch of law enforcement that I have never exposed myself to. And Scotland Yard was one of those so went over and I met John Grieve and I was told that by the way he's a Ripper expert. And so he offered to take me on a retrospective visit of the crime scenes."

John Grieve (2002) - "People have talked about Walter Sickert since almost the time of the murders to such an extent that the catalogue of a recent exhibition about him saw it necessary to dismiss the suggestion that he was Jack the Ripper. But in considerable detail which is not something you normally find in an exhibition catalogue."


You are killing me here !

Quote:
All this would certainly make for a very revealing, and entertaining book on 'A History of Ripper Writers and Research' and you wouldn't believe some of the material that I hold in my files. But it is not, and perhaps shouldn't be, for publication.
So, if I was to throw down an 'indecent proposal' type offer, you would still decline it?

Monty
__________________




Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-16-2008, 10:22 AM
Jeff Leahy Jeff Leahy is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: East end-kent
Posts: 3,737
Default

Yourself, Martin Fido, Paul Begg, I gather Rob House and Neal Shelden.....sounds like a day out with fantasy league Ripperology...I will try and gate crash the pub next door later.

The 'Diary' the thing of all ills! I think Don said that speculation at the time on its value went 4 million and upwards.

Actually while your correct that the infighting has always been there, its not actually as bad as it sounds..Ripperologists can be pretty cool more than that (and I include you in this) generous...

The history of information being shared and opened to each other is pretty good in the Ripper world and I've always found Ripperologists more than helpful sharing information and theories.

Money however does always rear its ugly head, there does seem to be some collective thought that someone somewhere is making money out of Jack The Ripper...I've just never come across them.

Perhaps that is why Patricia has really come in for such stick..I dont know.

What i do know is that any serious research (and I'm not talking about what TV people call research) takes patience, hardwork and lots of time. And that persons time takes money (because he has to pay the mortgage and feed himself.

So if someone like Patricia Cornwall comes along and puts her money into paying for serious research then she should be applauded and thanked..not put down with personal insults. God knows there are few enough people willing to do so..

Perhaps if she was made a little more welcome she might make the odd appearance...and I'd like to hear what she has to say...as I like to listen to anybody with something interesting to say on Jack the Ripper. Perhaps fund a little more research..

The Cohen debate forinstance...I gather from martins pod-cast that no-one has ever checked the records of the Jewish rest home he used as an address..as this address was a temporary home for newly arrived immigrants it might very well tell us if Cohen was in the country at the time of the murders?

There is tons of research that could be done....and everybody has the right to argue and debate there favored suspects because those suspects are all part of Stewart's (unwritten) history of Ripperology...as Stan Rosso pointed out in his pod-cast..thats what ripperology is about, arguing the toss on a very intricate piece of history...

However that is not the same as condoning personal attacks and we should be very careful not to do so..

Anyway I'd better fly...will hopefully see some of you late saturday...may I urge everybody to try and make these speeches...one off opportunity

have fun

Jeff
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.