Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Tumblety, Francis: Patterns of behavior and Tumblety - by Varqm 31 minutes ago.
Tumblety, Francis: Patterns of behavior and Tumblety - by Varqm 39 minutes ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: So if you live in Bethnal Green, you won´t kill in Whitechapel? - by Batman 4 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: So if you live in Bethnal Green, you won´t kill in Whitechapel? - by harry 4 hours ago.
Tumblety, Francis: Patterns of behavior and Tumblety - by Hercule Poirot 4 hours ago.
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: So if you live in Bethnal Green, you won´t kill in Whitechapel? - by MrBarnett 4 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Lechmere/Cross, Charles: So if you live in Bethnal Green, you won´t kill in Whitechapel? - (95 posts)
Non-Fiction: Jack and the Thames Torso Murders: A New Ripper? - (22 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - (12 posts)
Scene of the Crimes: The Bucks Row Project Summary Report. - (6 posts)
Tumblety, Francis: Patterns of behavior and Tumblety - (4 posts)
Letters and Communications: I'm not a butcher, I'm not a Yid...... - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Letters and Communications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #121  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:05 AM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Guy View Post
But in this scenario, Eddowes left ear would be next to be clipped and the killer would have to use his non knife hand to hold, steady or manoeuvre her head. So the left ear could have being placed on her chest or thereabouts and subsequently lost in the madness of the moment.
Perhaps it was in the madness of the moment that he forgot that he had pockets Plus of course it would have taken him no time at all to remove the other ear. But he didn't.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:52 AM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
Perhaps it was in the madness of the moment that he forgot that he had pockets Plus of course it would have taken him no time at all to remove the other ear. But he didn't.
Top o the morning Guvna!

I think in the craziness of that night and the heat of the moment, the ripper might have forgot about his clipping ear statement. and as an afterthought tried to do it with eddowes but perhaps because of the the circs-trying to hurry, dark, blood covering his hands making it slippery-dropped the ear.

then referenced it in the saucy jack post card-had not time.
__________________
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 02-08-2018, 07:59 AM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,142
Default

Hello Abby

As I've said, the "had not time to get ears for police" seems to refer to the "first one" (Stride), the reason for his not having time being because she "squealed a bit". As I've also said, he had plenty of time to "get" Eddowes' ears. Instead, he "got" her uterus and kidney, sending the latter not to the police, but to George Lusk. Not that I believe that the real Ripper sent it, of course.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 02-08-2018, 08:00 AM
DJA DJA is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Some Australian Mountain Range.
Posts: 1,647
Default

Ripperologists splitting ears.
__________________
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 02-08-2018, 09:20 AM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
Hello Abby

As I've said, the "had not time to get ears for police" seems to refer to the "first one" (Stride), the reason for his not having time being because she "squealed a bit". As I've also said, he had plenty of time to "get" Eddowes' ears. Instead, he "got" her uterus and kidney, sending the latter not to the police, but to George Lusk. Not that I believe that the real Ripper sent it, of course.
Hi Sam
Thanks! I think it refers in general that night.

I was not codding dear old Boss when I gave you the tip, you'll hear about Saucy Jacky's work tomorrow double event this time number one squealed a bit couldn't finish straight off. ha not the time to get ears for police. thanks for keeping last letter back till I got to work again.

its written on a postcard, very brief, and hes talking about the double event as whole it seems to me.

Quote:
As I've also said, he had plenty of time to "get" Eddowes' ears.
He didn't have plenty of time with eddowes-not at all. a few minutes.

And as ive said, perhaps in the heat of the moment-he only remembered about the letter after and with wanting to get away, it being dark and his hands slippery with blood, he dropped it and not being able to find it immediately, and with his main objective accomplished any way, he bolted.

You said your surprised how people can still believe that the letter might be authentic?! really? I know your a minimalist, but this is surprising even for you.

That its a known hoax is the biggest myth in ripperology I would say.

I would also say that it is an amazing coincidence that the writer says hes going to clip the ears, and lo and behold, the next time-- he does. I believe it was this fact that what was even prompted the CNA to send it over to the police.

add to that amazing coincidence that the writer gets wanting to get to work soon, and first one squealed abit right too.
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 02-08-2018, 01:06 PM
Kattrup Kattrup is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 198
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
I find it unbelievable that, in 2018, well-read students of the case are still prepared to argue that Jack the Ripper wrote Dear Boss and Saucy Jack.
.
I personally believe the Ripper sent Saucy Jack, and therefore also Dear Boss.

But it's possible I don't qualify as a well-read student
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 02-08-2018, 01:11 PM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kattrup View Post
But it's possible I don't qualify as a well-read student
Keep reading, Kat. You'll get there
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 02-08-2018, 01:59 PM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abby Normal View Post
I would also say that it is an amazing coincidence that the writer says hes going to clip the ears, and lo and behold, the next time-- he does.
No he doesn't. He says he's going to clip the EARS and send them to the police. In the event, he only cut one EAR - despite the fact that he had ample time to cut off both. Furthermore, he didn't even take it from the scene, still less send it to the police.
Quote:
add to that amazing coincidence that the writer gets wanting to get to work soon
Well, if you were pretending to be a notorious villain and wanted to grab the attention of police, press and public, isn't that just the sort of thing that you would write?
Quote:
and first one squealed abit right too
Assuming Stride squealed at all, of course. If she did, it would have been easy enough for someone with their ear to the ground (a journalist, perhaps, but not necessarily) to have picked up the info about the struggle with BS man and worked it into the narrative. Assuming she squealed at all, of course; it's easy to make this stuff up without fear of contradiction, as murder victims are very likely to squeal, aren't they?


If Saucy Jack had said this...

"First one squealed a bit. Had not time to get ears for police. Got the second one, though!"

... I might be more interested. As it is, the postcard's complete silence on the Eddowes murder, which was by far and away the Ripper's most extreme to date, is a dead give-away: the writer clearly knew little or nothing of the details of Eddowes' death; if he did, he'd have told us about it, make no mistake. Instead, he only alludes to the relatively "boring" murder of Liz Stride. And, despite the spectacular nature of Eddowes' demise, we don't get so much as a morsel of info; we're not even told whether the "second one" squealed or not. Indeed, the "second one" is not mentioned at all.

Whoever wrote that postcard was not responsible for Catherine Eddowes' death.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

Last edited by Sam Flynn : 02-08-2018 at 02:03 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 02-08-2018, 02:38 PM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,777
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
No he doesn't. He says he's going to clip the EARS and send them to the police. In the event, he only cut one EAR - despite the fact that he had ample time to cut off both. Furthermore, he didn't even take it from the scene, still less send it to the police.
Well, if you were pretending to be a notorious villain and wanted to grab the attention of police, press and public, isn't that just the sort of thing that you would write?
Assuming Stride squealed at all, of course. If she did, it would have been easy enough for someone with their ear to the ground (a journalist, perhaps, but not necessarily) to have picked up the info about the struggle with BS man and worked it into the narrative. Assuming she squealed at all, of course; it's easy to make this stuff up without fear of contradiction, as murder victims are very likely to squeal, aren't they?


If Saucy Jack had said this...

Whoever wrote that postcard was not responsible for Catherine Eddowes' death.
Hi Sam
Quote:
No he doesn't. He says he's going to clip the EARS and send them to the police. In the event, he only cut one EAR - despite the fact that he had ample time to cut off both.
You have no idea if he had ample time Sam. As a matter of fact-The Eddowes murder was under extremely tight time frame. and you completely continue to ignore the major obvious reason he didn't cut both ears and send to the police-that is after cutting the first one and losing it he decided to scat.

Let me ask you this-have you ever said that you were going to do something and then when the time came didn't, or didn't finish because of the circs at the time? of course you have. why you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge this could have happened is beyond me!

Finally- don't you find it an amazing coincidence (at the very least?) that the writer mentioned cutting ears off, and next time he strikes-he does? I mean come on.

Quote:
Well, if you were pretending to be a notorious villain and wanted to grab the attention of police, press and public, isn't that just the sort of thing that you would write?
well sure- but getting it right? another coincidence?

Quote:
Assuming Stride squealed at all, of course. If she did, it would have been easy enough for someone with their ear to the ground (a journalist, perhaps, but not necessarily) to have picked up the info about the struggle with BS man and worked it into the narrative. Assuming she squealed at all, of course; it's easy to make this stuff up without fear of contradiction, as murder victims are very likely to squeal, aren't they?
wrong.The witness Schwartz said she yelled out, but not that loudly. sounds a lot like squealed a bit to me. Not screamed like a stuck pig, not yelled bloddy murder--squealed abit. The writer pegged it again.

Quote:
Assuming she squealed at all, of course; it's easy to make this stuff up without fear of contradiction, as murder victims are very likely to squeal, aren't they?
apparently not (most of) the ripper victims, but you've conveniently forgot about that.

Quote:
"First one squealed a bit. Had not time to get ears for police. Got the second one, though!"

... I might be more interested. As it is, the postcard's complete silence on the Eddowes murder, which was by far and away the Ripper's most extreme to date, is a dead give-away: the writer clearly knew little or nothing of the details of Eddowes' death; if he did, he'd have told us about it, make no mistake. Instead, he only alludes to the relatively "boring" murder of Liz Stride. And, despite the spectacular nature of Eddowes' demise, we don't get so much as a morsel of info; we're not even told whether the "second one" squealed or not. Indeed, the "second one" is not mentioned at all.
ahh. so hear we are again with what someone thinks the writer should have written. LOL. please tell me you see the problem with this Sam?
were you in his head? are omnipotent?

And hes writing a quick post card-not a screen play.

and of course the second one is mentioned-the one that had her ear cut off, that he dropped and didn't have time to look for it!


Quote:
Whoever wrote that postcard was not responsible for Catherine Eddowes' death
In your opinion Sam.

Also, you said previously you didn't think stride was a ripper victim.

The writer obviously thinks so-killer or not. Why is that?
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 02-08-2018, 03:08 PM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 11,142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Abby Normal View Post
You have no idea if he had ample time Sam.
I have plenty of ideas on that score, don't worry. Re the severing of an ear, just imagine yourself doing it; perhaps you have already done so... to a rabbit or whatever, not a person! Hell, never mind a thin, floppy appendage like an ear - imagine cutting through a thick steak with a really sharp knife. Even cutting a steak takes no time at all. The killer had plenty of time to cut off both ears, no doubt about it. If he could afford the time to cut off the one ear (and the nose), he could afford the time to cut off the other ear, too.
Quote:
As a matter of fact-The Eddowes murder was under extremely tight time frame. and you completely continue to ignore the major obvious reason he didn't cut both ears and send to the police-that is after cutting the first one and losing it he decided to scat.
I won't answer that here, if you don't mind, because it'll turn into an Eddowes-only thread. Suffice to say I'm not ignoring anything, obvious or otherwise.
Quote:
Let me ask you this-have you ever said that you were going to do something and then when the time came didn't, or didn't finish because of the circs at the time? of course you have. why you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge this could have happened is beyond me!
I am not being stubborn. I have stated that it would have taken no time at all to cut off both ears and that the killer had plenty of time to do so, and I see no sensible reason to believe otherwise. None whatsoever. Two ears off... seconds, mate; mere seconds.
Quote:
Finally- don't you find it an amazing coincidence (at the very least?) that the writer mentioned cutting ears off, and next time he strikes-he does?
What was written in Dear Boss was NOT enacted in Mitre Square. What WAS enacted in Mitre Square was far, far worse than anything contained in Dear Boss, and none of this - NONE of it - was even hinted at in Saucy Jacky. Instead, the latter only mentions Stride's somewhat boring murder, almost certainly because the details of Eddowes' murder were not yet known. If they had been, any boastful killer - or hoaxer - worth his salt would have bragged about her murder, not Stride's. Instead, he says bugger all about her.
Quote:
Also, you said previously you didn't think stride was a ripper victim. The writer obviously thinks so-killer or not. Why is that?
People have a tendency to jump to conclusions, and are too easily impressed by "amazing coincidences" when they may well be nothing of the kind. Same thing goes for the contents of certain Ripper letters.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

Last edited by Sam Flynn : 02-08-2018 at 03:15 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.