Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Batman View Post
    The firing could come after Kelly.
    That would mean that he was a serving officer during the Ripper murders, so we need not concern ourselves with the question of whether an ex-policeman might keep some or all of his uniform as a disguise, which is where that line of enquiry seemed to be leading.
    Kind regards, Sam Flynn

    "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Monty View Post
      There’s a book which covers all this.

      Full kit was issued just prior to attestation, and should be handed back upon leaving the force. Boots used to be handed out however this was replaced by a boot allowance. Boots would be purchased from selected stores.

      As stated, kit would be returned upon the Constable leaving, however it was common for a blind eye to be turned at the retention of the odd piece of kit such as helmet, tunic or commonly truncheon, as a keepsake.

      Monty
      I was wondering because there are so many items in the private domain. I will get that book. I have "Scotland Yard Investigates", but probably need that.

      All the best.
      Bona fide canonical and then some.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by John G View Post
        Thanks for this, Monty, very informative.

        Would this have also applied to officers, i.e. inspector rank and above? The reason I ask is that my grandfather was a warrant officer second class at the end of World War 2 in the British Army and was then offered a commission. However, he turned it down for largely financial reasons, one of those being that, as an officer, he would have been required to buy his own uniform.
        The only member of the force who had to purchase their own uniform was the commissioner, because technically he wasn’t a Constable. This changed in the 1970s.

        Therefore each commissioner up until then had a slightly different uniform from their predecessor. The basic design stayed the same, but a symbolic flourish of a laurel leaf would make it their own.

        This makes identification of singular commissioner uniforms quite easy.

        Monty
        Monty

        https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

        Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

        http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Monty View Post
          The only member of the force who had to purchase their own uniform was the commissioner, because technically he wasn’t a Constable. This changed in the 1970s.

          Therefore each commissioner up until then had a slightly different uniform from their predecessor. The basic design stayed the same, but a symbolic flourish of a laurel leaf would make it their own.

          This makes identification of singular commissioner uniforms quite easy.

          Monty
          Thanks for the detailed reply, Monty. Much appreciated.

          Comment


          • If he had equipment (baton for Smith and Tabram), and then it seems absent later (Nichols onwards), then this could indicate the possibility of being fired between Tabram and Nichols.

            I would be interested in all LE fired or reprimanded around the time of the Whitechapel murders.

            Edit: Another explanation could be he went from clothed to plainclothes at some point. As in, still working.
            Last edited by Batman; 11-03-2018, 09:17 AM.
            Bona fide canonical and then some.

            Comment


            • Mrs. Mortimer thought she heard a policeman around the time of Stride's death.



              THE SILENCE OF THE MURDERER.
              When the alarm of murder was raised a young girl had been standing in a bisecting thoroughfare not fifty yards from the spot where the body was found. She had, she said, been standing there for about twenty-minutes, talking with her sweetheart, but neither of them heard any unusual noises. A woman who lives two doors from the club has made an important statement. It appears that shortly before a

              Page 3
              quarter to one o'clock she heard the measured, heavy tramp of a policeman passing the house on his beat. Immediately afterwards she went to the street-door, with the intention of shooting the bolts, though she remained standing there ten minutes before she did so. During the ten minutes she saw no one enter or leave the neighbouring yard, and she feels sure that had any one done so she could not have overlooked the fact. The quiet and deserted character of the street appears even to have struck her at the time. Locking the door, she prepared to retire to bed, in the front room on the ground floor, and it so happened that in about four minutes' time she heard Diemschitz's pony cart pass the house, and remarked upon the circumstance to her husband.

              DISTURBING THE MURDERER.
              Presuming that the body did not lie in the yard when the policeman passed - and it could hardly, it is thought, have escaped his notice - and presuming also that the assassin and his victim did not enter the yard while the woman stood at the door, it follows that they must have entered it within a minute or two before the arrival of the pony trap. If this be a correct surmise, it is easy to understand that the criminal may have been interrupted at his work. Diemschitz says he thinks it quite possible that after he had entered the yard the assassin may have fled out of it, having lurked in the gloom until a favourable moment arrived.
              Bona fide canonical and then some.

              Comment


              • Well, policemen did walk their beats after all. Can't see we can read anything into Mrs Mortimer's observation.
                Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                  Well, policemen did walk their beats after all. Can't see we can read anything into Mrs Mortimer's observation.
                  Well, if we believe that Mrs M went to the door 'immediately' after hearing a cop plodding past, why did she not mention seeing him when she got to the door and looked up and down the street?

                  Her husband may well have been seriously, possibly terminally, ill at the time, though. She may have had a lot on her mind.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                    Well, policemen did walk their beats after all. Can't see we can read anything into Mrs Mortimer's observation.
                    Well, the inference in the press is that the officer would have seen something, so Stride was still alive. Yet where is the officer responding to the distress heard by Swartz? Today the inference is made she heard the ripper walking away and not an officer. Just like Cox.
                    Bona fide canonical and then some.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Batman View Post
                      Well, the inference in the press is that the officer would have seen something, so Stride was still alive. Yet where is the officer responding to the distress heard by Swartz? Today the inference is made she heard the ripper walking away and not an officer. Just like Cox.
                      Mortimers account is all over the place. If she heard what she thought was a policemen then it must have been PC Smith, who passed up the street at 12:30.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
                        Well, policemen did walk their beats after all. Can't see we can read anything into Mrs Mortimer's observation.
                        I a nutshell we can't. I fail to see why it was mentioned

                        Comment


                        • Why would she be all over the place?

                          https://youtu.be/OsO7n_rrxSA?t=2592##

                          Her story is corroborated.

                          Why didn't the PC respond to what Schwartz witnessed?
                          Bona fide canonical and then some.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Batman View Post
                            Why would she be all over the place?

                            https://youtu.be/OsO7n_rrxSA?t=2592##

                            Her story is corroborated.

                            Why didn't the PC respond to what Schwartz witnessed?
                            Which policeman? Smith? Schwartz witnessed the assault upon Stride at approximately 12:45 Smith would not have been in the vicinity at the time.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Observer View Post
                              Which policeman? Smith? Schwartz witnessed the assault upon Stride at approximately 12:45 Smith would not have been in the vicinity at the time.


                              This suggests differently.
                              Bona fide canonical and then some.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Batman View Post
                                Peer reviewed by yourself?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X