Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - by OneRound 2 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Sam Flynn 2 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Sam Flynn 3 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by Trevor Marriott 3 hours ago.
General Discussion: Do you think it will be solved? - by Kattrup 3 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Abby Normal 6 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (31 posts)
Motive, Method and Madness: JtR was Law Enforcement Hypothesis - (6 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (4 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - (4 posts)
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - (3 posts)
Non-Fiction: The Whitechapel Murders of 1888: Another Dead End? - (3 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Suspects > Deeming, Frederick

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2015, 06:03 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,354
Default So it was him! Just not the C5

An interesting article on Deeming from March '92 just after hs arrest in WA.


Bathurst Free Press and Mining Journal 26 March 1892

Quote:



Latest Intelligence.

THE CONFESSION CONFIRMED.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
THE PRISONER OPENS HIS HEART TO HIS ATTORNEY.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ADMITS THAT HE COMMITTED THE RAINHAM MURDERS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
AND IS 'JACK THE RIPPER.'
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
STARTS FOR MELBOURNE IN IRONS.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[By Telegraph]

[From our own Correspondent.]

SYDNEY, Saturday. Deeming left Perth yesterday for Albany where the steamer for Melbourne will be boarded. He will be manacled and confined in a cabin during the voyage. The Herald's Perth correspondent has con firmed the alleged confession of Swanston, that he was implicated in both the Kainhill and Whitechapel murders.

The confession was made by Deeming to his legal adviser, Mr. Haynes. When the case was first placed in his hands Mr. Haynes demanded to know tho whole strength of his defence. Deeming replied that he would make a clean breast of it, and then said he was guilty of the Rainhill murders.

On the subject of the Windsor murder, how ever, a careful reticence was observed on both sides.

Mr. Haynes then asked his client whether he was 'Jack the Ripper' and Deeming replied that he had committed the last two murders in 1890, but that be knew nothing of the previous ones. It is understood that Deeming relies for his defence upon the fact that the murder was alleged to have been committed on the 24th December, and he can produce witnesses that his wife was seen in Melbourne five days later.
Make of it what you will, but another report to follow that ads interest.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2015, 06:26 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,354
Default

Could the ex-officer mean Deeming?


Kerang Times and Swan Hill Gazette 5 March 1889
Quote:

"Jack the Ripper' in Sydney.


An ex-member of the New South Wales detective force has an investigation in hand for the presumed identification of " Jack the Ripper." The ex-officer in question says The Telegraph, has a photograph in his possession which almost exactly answers to the description of the man being searched for, and he identifies him from various circumstances. Some years ago, it is said, the supposed murderer was an employee in a large wholesale importing house near Wynyard Square. Whilst in Sydney he contracted an illness which caused him to be dismissed from his situation. He began to drink heavily, became a monomaniac, and got somewhat deeply into debt. Whilst under the influence of liquor he was frequently heard to swear that if ever he left this country he would "have the lives of a hundred of them." He departed by a sailing vessel either for Plymouth or for London, and prior to leaving had for weeks carried with him a small surgeon's knife, with which on one occasion, when aggravated by a demand for money lent, he made a deliberate attempt to stab the ex-officer in question, who had bailed him up late at night in Hyde Park.
Deeming was almost certainly in Australia at around this time, he is said in the police files to have left Sydney about Dec 1887 to avoid arrest and we know that at various times he worked in companies engaged in providing goods to the building industry [mainly plumbing].

Or is it all more BS with an ex-copper looking for him moment in the spot-light?
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2015, 06:57 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,354
Default

Deeming worked at one stage for Keating and Co in Sydney who had offices not for from Wynyard. He also worked for Danks & Sons who were importers but I can't locate their office address in Sydney.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2015, 03:39 AM
Ausgirl Ausgirl is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 556
Default

This them?


1889
John Danks & Son Limited was formed

1859
Danks Holdings Limited is one of the oldest family businesses in Australia's top 500 companies, and the largest independent hardware wholesale distribution operation in the country.
John Danks & Son Pty Ltd began as a plumbing business in 1859, established by brothers John and Samuel. It occupied a prominent site in Bourke Street, Melbourne, for 100 years.
The business quickly grew to include factories in Melbourne and Sydney which manufactured and supplied a variety of plumbing and engineering products such as brassware, pumps, windmills and bells.


https://www.danks.com.au/public/comp...e/timeline.htm

There's some resources listed at the end of this which might prove useful:

http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/danks-john-3363

Last edited by Ausgirl : 01-29-2015 at 03:44 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2015, 03:53 AM
Ausgirl Ausgirl is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 556
Default

324 Pitt St, in 1911

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/page...earchLimits =

Though this article says he was contracted by Dank to work in Melbourne:

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/arti...earch Limits=


A noteworthy feature in connection with the Windsor tragedy is the flood of light that is being thrown upon the movements, during the past few years, of the man Deeming, suspected to be the murderer. We know of his career in such widely distant places as England ; Sydney, Bathurst, Melbourne, Rockhampton, Perth, and Adelaide, in Australia ; South Africa, Monte Video, and Aden. In this issue we publish some interesting particulars from Brisbane relating to Deeming's visit to Hull, and his marriage, at Beverley, under the name of Mr. Harry Lawson, with a young Scotch girl. This was in February, 1890. In May, 1890, Miss Steel, of Strathfield, received a letter from a girl friend in Beverley giving a detailed account of the marriage of "Mr. and Mrs. Lawson." This letter has been forwarded to us. Some of the touches in the letter curiously fit descriptions of Deeming sent from other sources. The writer, after some personal matter, goes on to say, " I have no news concerning ourselves to relate, so will give you an account of an event which has caused a great amount of excitement in Beverley. Some time at the latter part of last year, I think in November, a gentleman named Lawson came to Beverley and took lodgings with a Mrs. Matheson, a widow with two daughters. She had a large house on the New Walk, opposite to us. He was a very large sheep-farmer from Aus- tralia on business to this country appointing agents to sell his wool. He was in Hull doing this, and thought that he would like to stop a little while in Bever- ley, so someone recommended Mrs. M.'s lodgings. He took them, and very soon fell in love with the eldest daughter. She was a showy, harum-scarum sort of a girl, had been brought up in Scotland, and educated for a public school mistress, and had spent two years at college in Edinburgh. Owing to changes in the home, she had to give up college and return to Beverley. This gentleman was not very prepossessing in appearance, below the middle height, very round-shouldered, and plain in the face, and certainly looked well turned 40 ; but he looked a great swell when he wore his fur-lined great coat, and had the fronts thrown wide to show the fur.

=o

Last edited by Ausgirl : 01-29-2015 at 04:18 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2015, 04:39 AM
Ausgirl Ausgirl is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 556
Default

I hadn't seen this before....


. The same year this gentleman forwarded a communication to his friend in Bris- bane, informing him that Deeming was supposed to have sailed for Australia in the Jumna under the name of George, and asking him to have him ar- rested should he correspond with the photograph enclosed with the letter. The captain of the Jumna was communicated with on his arrival at Thursday Island, and he replied that there was no such pas- senger. The captain, however, stated that there were two brothers named Joyce on board, one of whom corresponded with the description sent. A Bris- bane detective went down to Moreton Bay to meet the Jumna and arrest the man Joyce, who was supposed to be identical with George. The captain stated that the Joyces had gone ashore at Rockhampton, but on seeing the photo of Deeming he said it did not correspond with Joyce. But he immediately recognised it as that of a passenger named Levy, who had voyaged by the Jumna from Aden to London on the previous trip There could scarcely be any doubt as to the correctness of this, as Deeming had forwarded to the diamond-fields a letter from Capetown to the effect that a friend of his having died he was to accompany the body as far as Aden, and then re-

turn to South Africa. The captain described Levy as a man who disposed of money freely during the voyage, who wore lots of jewellery, always wore a dress suit at dinner, and made himself very abnoxious to one of the lady passengers, and had to be severely reprimanded by the captain. At this time Deeming, alias Levy, had a wife and family living at Birkenhead.

http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/19007687
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-29-2015, 10:13 AM
Ausgirl Ausgirl is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 556
Default

GUT, sorry if you already have all this..

Mr. J. Prior, of 1 Kerferd-road, Albert park, has an extensive knowledge of Frederick Bayley Deeming, and in an inter- view with a representative of The Argus last night he furnished some details which are of interest. He said that in 1884 Deeming was employed as a plumber in Melbourne by Messrs. John Danks and Sons, of Bourke-street. He was then a married man, with one child, and about 28 years of age. After a twelvemonths' connection, with the firm, Deeming left and went to Sydney, where he entered the service of Messrs. Keating Co. About the end of 1886 he went into business as a plumber and gasfitter on his own account in one of the suburbs, and soon afterwards removed to the city, establishing himself first of all in Lee's-court, off King-street, and then in Phillips-street. There he became much indebted to Mr. Prior, who was carrying on the business as J. Prior and Co. of an importer of plumbers' brassware, and Mr. Prior, failing to collect from him any of the moneys he owed, upbraided him with his extravagance, and his in- dulgence in the luxury of a pony carriage. Deeming cared very little for the dunning of his creditors, and when overtaken by a fire, which burned down his premises, he filed his schedule. This was in December of 1887, and while he was being examined in the Insolvency Court he prevaricated so much respecting a bogus advertisement, which he had caused to be inserted in the press calling upon Frederick Bayley Deeming to present himself and claim an inheritance in Liverpool, that he was sentenced to fourteen days' imprisonment, and spent Christmas of that year in gaol. He was accompanied in his confinement by one of his witnesses, who also failed to give his evidence straightforwardly, and another only narrowly escaped a similar fate. When Deeming had served his term of imprisonment and his examination was proceeded with it was found that he "cooked" his books and accounts in his own favour. Mr. Prior and other creditors were considering the advisability of issuing a warrant for his arrest for fraudulent insolvency when he disappeared, and thenceforward was a stranger to Sydney. He left his wife behind, also his children, but it was understood they followed him to South Africa a little while later.

http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article8406840

In 1883 he entered the service of Messrs. John Danks and Son, plumbers, of Melbourne, and the same year found him in Rock- hampton (Q.), with Messrs. Williams Bros. He then decided upon striking out on his own account, and he opened a shop in opposition to his late employers ; as it turned out, at Messrs. Danks and Son's ex- pense, for when he gave up business and re- turned to Sydney, his account with that firm stood in debit to the tune of 200. During the whole of 1885 he appeared to have been working with several firms of plumbers in. this city, having taken the precaution to drop the latter portion of his name, in case of accidents. Growing bolder, he again opened business for himself in one of the suburbs, under his proper name, and he subsequently removed to the heart of the town. His business did not prosper, however, and he found his way into the Insolvency Court.

http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article13860833

Last edited by Ausgirl : 01-29-2015 at 10:37 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-29-2015, 12:42 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,354
Default

Thanks Ausgirl an interesting character.

It would have been early in his career but I wonder of FBD had come across Henry Lawson as he seems to have had a habit of taking the names of places he'd lived [Swanston and Drounin spring to mind] or people he'd worked with [Williams for one] as aliases.

And then his defence Counsel went on to bigger and better?? office.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-29-2015, 02:02 PM
AlanG AlanG is offline
Constable
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 77
Default

I thought I read he was in jail in the UK at the time of one of the 5 murders.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-29-2015, 02:21 PM
GUT GUT is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: I come from a land Down Under
Posts: 7,354
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanG View Post
I thought I read he was in jail in the UK at the time of one of the 5 murders.
Ummmmm the article says [though I doubt the truth] that he confessed to two of the Whitechapel murders in 1890, so not the c5.
__________________
G U T

There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.