Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by rjpalmer 46 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Ben 2 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Wickerman 5 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Bridewell 7 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Bridewell 7 hours ago.
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - by c.d. 8 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (13 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (4 posts)
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - (3 posts)
General Discussion: Do you think it will be solved? - (2 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Scene of the Crimes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-11-2018, 12:23 PM
Debra A Debra A is offline
Assistant Commissioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Yorkshire England
Posts: 3,120
Default

Nice to see all the work here too, Jerry.
__________________
,,`,, Debs ,,`,,

I am not DJA. He's called Dave.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-11-2018, 08:07 PM
jerryd jerryd is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
Good show!
Even though I find it hard to believe anyone could be engaged in a deadly vendetta against a moribund organisation like the Metropolitan Board of Works (which technically no longer even existed by the time of the '89 murders) it's still fascinating, and I certainly appreciate the work that's gone into pulling it together.
Great stuff Jerry.
Hi Joshua and thanks!

Actually, the Whitechapel Board of Works was still in existence and operating under the same name even after the formation of the London County Council on March 21st, 1889 (the first official meeting as the LCC).

Whitechapel District (Wkipedia)

Until 1889 the district was in the county of Middlesex, but included in the area of the Metropolitan Board of Works. In 1889 the area of the MBW was constituted the County of London, and the district board became a local authority under the London County Council.

Here are some reports referring to them as such in 1889 during the murders and also in February 1891 near the Coles murder.

The Eastern Post & City Chronicle
Saturday, 20 July 1889.


THE Whitechapel District Board of Works must consider at its meeting on Monday the advisability of passing a vote of condolence with the "imaginative" young man of the Daily Telegraph, who has had the audacity to state that the lighting in Castle Alley is somewhat faulty. The probability is, the writer has never seen Whitechapel, and if he has, it was with the eyes of a pessimist. "Go to a nunnery, go," thou irresponsible scribbler, for thou art as surely mad as young Hamlet himself.

East London Advertiser
Saturday, 21 February 1891.


WHITECHAPEL DISTRICT BOARD OF WORKS.

THE NEW MORTUARY BEGUN.

"MURDER" MYSTERIES ONCE MORE.

This Board met on Monday, at the offices, Great Alie-street, Mr. George Ilsley in the chair, and the following members present:- Messrs. Catmur, Boswell, Rycroft, Van Thal, Hensley, W. C. Johnson, Sparks, Hall, Chillingworth, Bamberger, Karamelli, Harris, Snell, Barham, Legg, Tarling, L.C.C., Barber, Hamilton, Peters, Tate, Wines, Lashmar, and the Rev. J. H. Scott.


Some of the same members of the Board were present in 1891 as were in 1888.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-11-2018, 08:19 PM
jerryd jerryd is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,131
Default

The Metropolitan BoW held a lot of weight and were quite the bullies from reports I have read. Shortly before they were to relinquish power to the LCC they pushed through certain construction projects that the LCC was opposed to. They were also the recipient of a lot of criticism as well as the dishers out of some. The BoW was very critical, for example, of the way the police were handling the whole ripper series even writing a letter to Sir Charles Warren. On the other hand, a common theme is they were criticized for poor lighting in the district of the East End, especially.

During the inquest of Alice McKenzie a rider was added at the end of the inquest demanding Castle Alley be opened up to Whitechapel Road.

The jury, after a short deliberation, returned a verdict of "Wilful murder against some person or persons unknown," and added a rider endorsing the remarks of the Coroner, and requesting him to forward a recommendation to the County Council, and the Whitechapel District Board of Works to open up Castle-alley to the Whitechapel High-street as a thoroughfare.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-11-2018, 08:20 PM
jerryd jerryd is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Debra A View Post
Nice to see all the work here too, Jerry.
Thanks, Debs, Abby and Gareth!
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-11-2018, 08:48 PM
jerryd jerryd is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,131
Default

School Board purchase, rescinded. So, the BoW owned the artisan dwellings and other property on Goulston Street? I wonder if the government owned properties in Mitre Square were actually BOW owned?

REGARDING GOULSTON STREET and CASTLE ALLEY

25th February, 1886
Minutes of Proceedings, Volume 24
By London (England). School Board



Last edited by jerryd : 04-11-2018 at 09:04 PM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-13-2018, 06:37 AM
Robert St Devil Robert St Devil is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Kilttown, Scotland
Posts: 834
Default

these are from the East London Observer, 13 February 1886, jerryd.
Attached Images
  
__________________
there,s nothing new, only the unexplored
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-13-2018, 06:46 AM
Robert St Devil Robert St Devil is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: North Kilttown, Scotland
Posts: 834
Default

This is Dr Loane's report, as reported in the East London Observer two weeks later on 26 February 1886.
Attached Images
  
__________________
there,s nothing new, only the unexplored
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-13-2018, 05:21 PM
jerryd jerryd is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,131
Default

Thanks RSD,

That's interesting stuff! Thanks for posting it.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-13-2018, 06:35 PM
MrBarnett MrBarnett is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Romford
Posts: 1,577
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jerryd View Post
Thanks RSD,

That's interesting stuff! Thanks for posting it.
Yes, Robert, that is indeed very interesting. The Rev. Sam Barnett himself (among others) targetting 26/7 Dorset Street and Millers Court exclusively is very telling.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-15-2018, 10:10 AM
jerryd jerryd is offline
Inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,131
Default Minutes of the Board

This archive does not have the records for 1888 for some reason. The newspaper reports carried some of the proceedings for 1888, however. The Whitechapel District seemed to meet on Mondays. I will post some of those reports at a later time.

https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/100233047
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.