Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

As it turns out, the Ripper Cabal is real...it's just not who you thought it was

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View Post
    The new members may not get it, Ally, so for their benefit I looked up the first use of Cabal here on the Casebook Message Board.

    It was way back in March of 2008, in a thread called The New Vogue featuring:

    the Suspended Gideon Fell
    the Banned Cap'n Jack
    the Inactive Aspallek
    along with Smiling Dan Norder
    and a few survivors like Robert, Mike & Howie.

    But yes the poster who first spoke of the Cabal was .............drumroll...................

    ... the Suspended Mr Poster. Here is the post that launched a thousand tickets to nowhere when in reply to Dan he said:


    http://forum.casebook.org/showthread...=4806#post4806
    wasnt Gideon Fell --Stewart Evans in disguise?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
      Hello Mr. Begg. Delighted so to do.

      Reason, itself, is objective. It admits of certain deductive inferences (Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Disjunctive Syllogism, etc); ways of calculating inductive inferences, and so on. Moreover, this canon of rationality is open to all, and able to be applied uniformly. In a word, it is "objective."

      Unfortunately, we, as human beings, ofttimes misapply reason. When forging a chain of, say, inductive reasoning, we allow weak links, redundant ones, and so on, to make up that chain. With this human element, the way that "reason" is applied is now tweaked to fit an individual in a specific set of circumstances. Hence, "subjective."

      Cheers.
      LC
      Hi Lynn
      That's what I thought you meant, but isn't that why we test those links as best we can with the materials at our disposal?

      Comment


      • wasnt Gideon Fell --Stewart Evans in disguise?
        Yes, he was.

        Wolf.

        Comment


        • ought

          Hello Mr. Begg. Thanks.

          Well, we certainly ought to in order to be responsible members of the epistemic community.

          Cheers.
          LC

          Comment


          • At this time we are making the decision to close the thread. We believe that everything that could be said has been said, and there is nothing further that needs to be added. Thank you.

            Comment

            Working...
            X