Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Wickerman 6 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Joshua Rogan 16 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: torso maps - by FrankO 31 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by packers stem 37 minutes ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by packers stem 42 minutes ago.
Torso Killings: torso maps - by FrankO 1 hour and 5 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (42 posts)
Torso Killings: torso maps - (20 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: If Mrs. Maxwell Didn't See Mary Who Did She See? - (2 posts)
Non-Fiction: Walter Dew's account...... - (1 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (1 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Motive, Method and Madness

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #441  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:50 PM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 10,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherman View Post
Are you trying to make some point here, or just describing the site?
The point is that, whilst it could be fairly described as common land, it wasn't exactly Hampstead Heath or Wimbledon Common. It was a strip of waste land to the other side of his garden fence, where people periodically dumped broken furniture and other junk.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message
  #442  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:51 PM
Elamarna Elamarna is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: South london
Posts: 4,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherman View Post
To me, the most important insight of the whole thread is the idea that the killer may have dumped the parts from the western part of London for the reason that he wanted them to pass by central London and to maximize the odds for them being found.

I had never thought of that possibility before, and it has me very interested.
Yes that is an interesting fact, not new but highlighted again,
Your suggestion is perfectly plausible; but so is the one that he was possibly living, killing and certainly disposing of the body parts there in West London with no other motive other than using near by locations for this.

Would be so easy to start debating this at length, but we need more evidence of some kind or we will just go round in circles.

Reading it all, in batches while I write up other thing
It's an interesting thread with some good ideas from all angles, if something new does come up then I may join in more.


Steve
Quick reply to this message
  #443  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:56 PM
Fisherman Fisherman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 17,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
You mean he went West past Battersea to drop the body parts, hoping that the river would take the on a grand tour to central London, so that they could be more easily found?!! If he'd wanted them easily found, he'd have left them in full view in public places, just like someone else I could mention.
I reserve the word "silly" for more appropriate occasions. Like if somebody should call the torso man discreet or something like that. Now THAT´S what I call really silly.

If somebody had suggested that Henry Lee Lucas made a point by dumping a victim outside the gates of a prison,would you call that silly too? If somebody told you that Albert di Salvo after having strangled one woman, filled a bathtub with water and dumped her body there, posed so that the buttocks reaached over the surface but the rest stayed underneath, would you thiink that silly to? And if you were told that di Salvos reply to the question why, was "I dunno, I just did it", would you regard that as silly too?

You see, in my world, serialists may have a meaning built into what they do. They may dump bodies and/or body parts to make a point. Was it silly of the Hillside stranglers to dispose of their bodies where they did, when they could easily have made them disappear instead?

You worded it eminently in a former post of yours. The killer produced something eerily reminiscent of a sushi conveyor belt, through the parts of central London.
Plus he DID leave parts in parks and cellar vaults and under railway arches.

I cannot think of a much more safe way to have your work acknowledged. Silly me.
Quick reply to this message
  #444  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:57 PM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 10,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elamarna View Post
Your suggestion is perfectly plausible
I don't see Fisherman's suggestion that the torso killers dumped bits of people in the Thames "to maximise the odds of their being found" or "wanted them to pass by central London" as being in the least bit plausible. They're utterly wacky.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message
  #445  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:58 PM
Fisherman Fisherman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 17,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
The point is that, whilst it could be fairly described as common land, it wasn't exactly Hampstead Heath or Wimbledon Common. It was a strip of waste land to the other side of his garden fence, where people periodically dumped broken furniture and other junk.
I fail to see where I implicated that the ground he used was like Hampsted Heath or Wimbledon. But sure enough, there were three kids standing by the bonfire as the bodies turned to ash, so if you think it was a very private part, you may need to rethink that particular point.
Quick reply to this message
  #446  
Old 10-11-2017, 01:03 PM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherman View Post
No, Gareth, there is no "almost certainly" involved in your suggestion. I think you will find that most people believe that it is a near certainty that the killer was looking for recognition of his work in some way, and that the dumping processes he used had that aim. Like, for instance, Mei Trow, who likely voices the common opinion on this score.

You are beginning to sound like Ben used to do.
hey-lay off Ben!
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message
  #447  
Old 10-11-2017, 01:04 PM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 10,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherman View Post
I reserve the word "silly" for more appropriate occasions. Like if somebody should call the torso man discreet or something like that. Now THAT´S what I call really silly.
I said that dumping bodies in a river is comparatively discreet compared to ripping bodies open and removing organs on a public street with the police breathing down your neck... a perfectly reasonable, and justifiable statement to make. Not "silly" in the least.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message
  #448  
Old 10-11-2017, 01:05 PM
Abby Normal Abby Normal is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherman View Post
Abby Normal: Fiiiiiishy??
you havnt responded to this yet. Am I getting warmer?

Winter´s coming, Abby...

did he want to use the parts he disjointed for something?

In 1873? No.

do we have a Frankenstein like thing going on here?

You know-Shelley estate thigh and all that???

No.
Ixnay on the Ottenray!
__________________
"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"

-Edgar Allan Poe


"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

-Frederick G. Abberline
Quick reply to this message
  #449  
Old 10-11-2017, 01:07 PM
Sam Flynn Sam Flynn is offline
Casebook Supporter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 10,059
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fisherman View Post
I fail to see where I implicated that the ground he used was like Hampsted Heath or Wimbledon.
You didn't. I just didn't want people getting the impression that, by your describing it as "common ground", you meant that it was a busy public area, which it wasn't.
Quote:
But sure enough, there were three kids standing by the bonfire as the bodies turned to ash
They were attracted by the bonfire. Kids often are.
Quote:
so if you think it was a very private part, you may need to rethink that particular point.
I don't, but if you believe it was "very public", it's you who needs to re-think.
__________________
Kind regards, Sam Flynn

"Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)
Quick reply to this message
  #450  
Old 10-11-2017, 01:08 PM
Fisherman Fisherman is offline
Commisioner
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 17,176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Flynn View Post
I don't see Fisherman's suggestion that the torso killers dumped bits of people in the Thames "to maximise the odds of their being found" or "wanted them to pass by central London" as being in the least bit plausible. They're utterly wacky.
You may wish to allow people like Steve to make his own calls, Gareth. There comes a time when we are wrong every now and then, all of us. That insight is valuable to ponder every now and then, even if we feel frustrated and think that there is no way that we can be wrong.

We can, you know.
Quick reply to this message
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.