Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by Sam Flynn 10 minutes ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by Simon Wood 13 minutes ago.
Witnesses: Sarah and Maurice Lewis - by Scott Nelson 2 hours ago.
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - by Scott Nelson 2 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Varqm 2 hours ago.
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - by Darryl Kenyon 2 hours ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (11 posts)
Maybrick, James: One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary - (11 posts)
Torso Killings: torso maps - (5 posts)
Maybrick, James: And This Is Factual! - (4 posts)
Witnesses: Sarah and Maurice Lewis - (3 posts)
Maybrick, James: New Thoughts On The “diary” - (2 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Witnesses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2015, 05:14 AM
packers stem packers stem is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 841
Cool Who was the most 'unreliable' witness?

The reliability of witnesses has cropped up in a number of threads lately.For me the reliability should be based on a number of criteria and NOT A PARTICULAR THEORY
Many witnesses being described as unreliable purely because their evidence throws a spanner in the works isn't the way surely?
For me certain aspects should carry significant weight to their believability
1.Daytime or night time
2.Possibility of being intoxicated or sober
3.Sighted person being known to witness
4.Verbal communication
5.Eagerness to testify
6.Conviction in belief

For me the above if worked out in to some sort of points chart would put Caroline Maxwell so far out in front there's just no contest
As for most unreliable at the moment I'd have to go for Hutchinson mainly down to his convenient timing following the close of the inquest. Although he has 3 and 4, his lack of 5 destroys it...
__________________
You can lead a horse to water.....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2015, 07:43 PM
Premium Member
SirJohnFalstaff SirJohnFalstaff is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Abzurdistan or Canada, depends
Posts: 565
Default

The man who pretended to sell the grapes to Stride is, in my opinion, unreliable. Pearly Poll also, as she probably even lied on purpose.
If we go for "honest but unreliable", I'd go for Maxwell.

Schwartz is the most reliable witness, in my opinion. Simply because he saw something exceptional, easier to remember. But 1- I'm not convinced the assaillant said "Lipski" (Schwartz spoke no English and imo, could easily confuse a word for another) 2- the man he saw attacking Stride was probably not Jack.
__________________
Is it progress when a cannibal uses a fork?
- Stanislaw Jerzy Lee
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2015, 07:49 PM
Damaso Marte Damaso Marte is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 454
Default

Lawende fares very poorly under your factors.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-17-2015, 08:00 PM
Premium Member
SirJohnFalstaff SirJohnFalstaff is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Abzurdistan or Canada, depends
Posts: 565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damaso Marte View Post
Lawende fares very poorly under your factors.
I think Lawende said so himself.
__________________
Is it progress when a cannibal uses a fork?
- Stanislaw Jerzy Lee
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-17-2015, 11:57 PM
packers stem packers stem is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 841
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damaso Marte View Post
Lawende fares very poorly under your factors.
Quite
Yet 99 out of 100 will state his sighting as known fact merely because it causes few issues.He claimed to recognise her clothing if memory serves...
PC Long in Goulston Street has to be right up there also
__________________
You can lead a horse to water.....
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.