Casebook: Jack the Ripper - Main
   

Introduction
Victims
Suspects
Witnesses
Ripper Letters
Police Officials
Official Documents
Press Reports
Victorian London
Message Boards
Ripper Media
Authors
Dissertations
Timelines
Games & Diversions
Photo Archive
Ripper Wiki
Casebook Examiner
Ripper Podcast
About the Casebook

Most Recent Posts:
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - by harry 6 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - by Harry D 7 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - by Sam Flynn 20 minutes ago.
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - by Harry D 53 minutes ago.
General Discussion: Do you think it will be solved? - by Karl 56 minutes ago.
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - by Robert 1 hour and 4 minutes ago.

Most Popular Threads:
Elizabeth Stride: For what reason do we include Stride? - (23 posts)
Non-Fiction: the victims werent prostitutes - (19 posts)
Hutchinson, George: Any updates, or opinions on this witness. - (13 posts)
Mary Jane Kelly: Was Mary Kelly a Ripper victim? - (11 posts)
A6 Murders: A6 Rebooted - (6 posts)
Witnesses: Mizen's inquest statement reconstructed - (5 posts)

Wiki Updates:
Robert Sagar
Edit: Chris
May 9, 2015, 12:32 am
Online newspaper archives
Edit: Chris
Nov 26, 2014, 10:25 am
Joseph Lawende
Edit: Chris
Mar 9, 2014, 10:12 am
Miscellaneous research resources
Edit: Chris
Feb 13, 2014, 9:28 am
Charles Cross
Edit: John Bennett
Sep 4, 2013, 8:20 pm

Most Recent Blogs:
Mike Covell: A DECADE IN THE MAKING.
February 19, 2016, 11:12 am.
Chris George: RipperCon in Baltimore, April 8-10, 2016
February 10, 2016, 2:55 pm.
Mike Covell: Hull Prison Visit
October 10, 2015, 8:04 am.
Mike Covell: NEW ADVENTURES IN RESEARCH
August 9, 2015, 3:10 am.
Mike Covell: UPDDATES FOR THE PAST 11 MONTHS
November 14, 2014, 10:02 am.
Mike Covell: Mike’s Book Releases
March 17, 2014, 3:18 am.

Go Back   Casebook Forums > Ripper Discussions > Victims > Non-Canonical Victims > Emma Smith

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-08-2016, 08:38 AM
sepiae sepiae is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 145
Default The Tell-Tale Blade - Thoughts on the Knives Used on Martha Tabram

Hello everybody,

I've reached a careful conclusion (o-oh) about what happened to Martha Tabram, meaning how it happened.
The write-down of this resulted in 4 pages, so I'm rather attaching it.

In a nutshell, I'm arguing, that while the use of 2 blades is frequently seen as one argument against the murderer of Tabram as having been the same perpetrator who later murdered Nichols, Chapman, Eddowes and Kelly, it is in fact the very presence of the larger of the blades, which was used to stab her in the heart, that, because it was brought along with the smaller one, may very well imply not only clear premeditation but also that we might be dealing with the same man.

I'd be very grateful for thoughts and/or rebuttals.

Have a great weekend
Attached Images
File Type: pdf The Tell-Tale Blade.pdf (52.7 KB, 165 views)
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-08-2016, 08:59 AM
Kattrup Kattrup is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Denmark
Posts: 192
Default

Thank you, Sepiae, very interesting.

According to your theory, the killer changed from stabbing the heart to strangulation/cut throat.

I would suggest he might have done this because of the difficulty in stabbing a standing, conscious individual directly in the heart.

The later victims were not likely to lie down, so I think he would have realized this difficulty.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-08-2016, 09:17 AM
sepiae sepiae is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kattrup View Post
Thank you, Sepiae, very interesting.

According to your theory, the killer changed from stabbing the heart to strangulation/cut throat.

I would suggest he might have done this because of the difficulty in stabbing a standing, conscious individual directly in the heart.

The later victims were not likely to lie down, so I think he would have realized this difficulty.

Hi Kattrup,

wow, you're quick. Thank you

Yes, that's indeed a thought I also had. Him bringing the large blade for the specific purpose of stabbing the heart, the need to drive it through bone still presenting a challenge, and effort.
I have no troubles at all imagining him seeing another knife later that, perhaps first on the more instinctive level, actually incites the idea of throat-cutting in him.

I have a similar idea like yours also in regards of the perp having not strangled Catherine Eddowes:
strangling costs more effort and time than the movies will have us believe;
it also involves the victim fighting back, e.g. kicking you in the groin.
it's energy- and time-consuming, it's an inconvenience on the way to what is the real priority.
hence he might be trying without the strangling (alternatively something just went wrong)
- and it is a sufficient explanation for the difference in the cuts to Kate's throat, compared with Polly and Annie.

With Tabram it's the very presence of that large blade in the 1st place that intrigues.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-08-2016, 09:21 AM
sepiae sepiae is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 145
Default p.s.

... although I believe that the victim out on the ground is the most convenient with either method.
It's been theorized that he might have tripped his victims. And with Nichols and Chapman it was strangulation.
Which is in the end my point:
- incapacitating the victim (strangulation & throat-cutting / stab to the heart)
- followed by what he wanted to do to the body, i.e. multiple stabs evolving into mutilation and organ extraction
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-08-2016, 09:43 AM
John Wheat John Wheat is offline
Chief Inspector
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,780
Default

I agree sepiae. It all points to the same man. Plus I wouldn't have thought it that unusual for a serial killer to carry more than one knife.

Cheers John
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2016, 10:18 AM
sepiae sepiae is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wheat View Post
I agree sepiae. It all points to the same man. Plus I wouldn't have thought it that unusual for a serial killer to carry more than one knife.

Cheers John
Hi John,

well, I wouldn't know about how unusual it'd be, especially for this perpetrator - in the end it's that large one that I initially did find unusual. Or rather the result:

39 stabs
38 of them delivered all over the body
only 1 delivered to the heart, and with quite some precision

does really not look like randomness

but that doesn't contradict you, of course
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old Yesterday, 02:01 AM
Karl Karl is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 215
Default

Shouldn't this thread be in the Martha Tabram section? Emma Smith isn't even one of the canonicals, so I fail to see even the faintest connection.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old Yesterday, 02:54 AM
Ginger Ginger is offline
Sergeant
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 519
Default

It's pure speculation on my part, with no evidence to back it up, but I've always wondered if the murderer (assuming it was only one) didn't stab Tabram first in the chest with the big knife, expecting her to gasp and fall down dead, like a murder victim in the penny dreadfuls. In my scenario she fainted, and probably struck her head when she fell. The murderer believed that she was dead. Then, when he'd pushed up her dress and begun to 'play' with the small, sharp knife he'd brought along for that purpose, she gave some sign of life, perhaps seemed to be recovering consciousness. The killer panicked, and began stabbing frantically with the small knife which he had in his hand. As I said, complete speculation, but this has always seemed plausible to me.
__________________
- Ginger
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old Yesterday, 04:39 AM
Karl Karl is offline
Detective
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 215
Default

That's as good an explanation as any, Ginger. Perfectly plausible. Two knives does not necessarily mean two people. It could mean one person, with premeditation not only to kill but to get creative.

Last edited by Karl : Yesterday at 04:46 AM.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old Yesterday, 06:48 AM
Rob1n Rob1n is offline
Constable
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Edgware.
Posts: 65
Default Knives used on Tabram

Wasn't the stab to the heart by a triangular blade? I might be mistaken.
Didn't she go off with a soldier, if so, the knife sounds like the type of bayonet used for the Martini Henry.

If he had tripped Tabram it would be a lot easier to stab her in the heart whilst she was on the floor as the bayonet had no handle, only a curved mounting point for the barrel, much easier to use both hands and thrust downwards, it would be extremely hard to stab forward into a standing person.

Once on the ground dead, he could pull a smaller knife and mutilate at will, which is what he normally does , perhaps the bayonet thing was an early experiment in initial first contact only to be developed later to the strangulation, then/or, the slice across the throat?

As to why two knives, perhaps, as a soldier, he carried a bayonet in his webbing/frog (I don't know if they were allowed to carry it when they were on 24 hr leave)?

Again, as a soldier, he may also carry a personal knife for close in self defence or for whittling? Look at most soldiers in the 20th century, they have a bayonet and often a fighting knife (Kabar bowie, commando knife etc).

I really don't know.
Quick reply to this message Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.